Ultimately, its irrelevant. MFP numbers depict a model of the real world. The model never truly depicts real life. You test your model with frequent weigh-ins. Adjust calorie input accordingly to reach your goals. If you're doing a tremendous amount of cardio, then you ought to be eating more than if you weren't. If you're running a 5k once a week then it probably doesn't matter.For those that log MFP, do you try to stick to your calories regardless of exercise or account for it in your daily? Using random #'s, if it says to lose X pounds a week eat 2000 calories, but you go run and burn 700. Do you still aim to eat only 2,000, or 2,700?
Same. In my opinion there's no point in doing cardio if you're going to eat more to compensate for the "extra" calories you burned...I never account for cardio.
You're stuck looking at this from the perspective of a fat man who desperately doesn't want to be fat. Once you're within the appropriate weight range, you ought to re-analyze this.Same. In my opinion there's no point in doing cardio if you're going to eat more to compensate for the "extra" calories you burned...
Thanks for the tip and I'm pleased with 3-4 lb a week. So the interesting thing is that for my weight my "fat %" read considerably lower than my dietician thought, and told me to get an official check from my doctor which I did, and it confirmed it. So I'm 6'3" 309.6lb (at the start of diet) with a fat percentage of ... 28%, and visceral fat rating of 12. They were expecting in the 30s, and upper teens. I'm not sure if that will affect anything but I will take your words to heart. I certainly don't want to lose any muscle doing this. My ultimate goal is 200lb, and stretch of 180lb but my main goal for myself for the time being is 250, and if I can do that I feel like I can do anything. However, if my fat % hits in the lower normal range, I'll probably stop.Nice, Noodle.
Aladain - As you said, much of that dramatic weight loss is from lowering your inflammation and not retaining as much water. Even with a dramatic caloric deficit, I wouldn't expect more than 3-4 lbs per week. Your body has a ceiling for how much stored fat it can convert to usable energy per day. If you're losing more weight than that, it's not just body fat that you're losing.
That seems unrealistically low for a guy sitting over 300 poundsThanks for the tip and I'm pleased with 3-4 lb a week. So the interesting thing is that for my weight my "fat %" read considerably lower than my dietician thought, and told me to get an official check from my doctor which I did, and it confirmed it. So I'm 6'3" 309.6lb (at the start of diet) with a fat percentage of ... 28%, and visceral fat rating of 12. They were expecting in the 30s, and upper teens. I'm not sure if that will affect anything but I will take your words to heart. I certainly don't want to lose any muscle doing this. My ultimate goal is 200lb, and stretch of 180lb but my main goal for myself for the time being is 250, and if I can do that I feel like I can do anything. However, if my fat % hits in the lower normal range, I'll probably stop.
I'm not exercising much due to the restrictiveness of the diet (I get worn out very quickly), but I am lifting a bit. I'm intaking around 1100-1300 calories per day.
I know, I can even scan the analysis and show you after I get back home (out of town atm). It was very unusual, but i have to assume its really higher and for some reason the two tests I had were wrong.That seems unrealistically low for a guy sitting over 300 pounds
Sorry I brainfarted when I typed that and I meant your calories. Are you only eating 1100-1300 per day? did I read that right? My wife weighs 100 pounds and eats more than thatI know, I can even scan the analysis and show you after I get back home (out of town atm). It was very unusual, but i have to assume its really higher and for some reason the two tests I had were wrong.
You could easily double that calorie intake and still lose a good amount of weight.I certainly don't want to lose any muscle doing this. ....... I'm intaking around 1100-1300 calories per day.
The first part of this statement is not true. You do not stunt weight loss by "not eating enough". That is not a thing. The second part of the statement is definitely true though. The best way to fail is to go too hard too fast. It's a marathon not a sprint.If you don't eat enough you can actually stunt the weight loss and make yourself pretty miserable.