I've heard that synthetic THC is has much less efficacy than natural marijuana due to the high volume and variation of chemicals in marijuana that can't be supplanted with just THC.
It's true. The good thing is upping the dosage is not as problematic as it would be with the psychedelically active thc. No ethical dilemmas to consider - which is the real problem with natural thc. Depending on usage, psychedelia not being a goal, it's not a problem that the efficacy of the drug is lower.
I think with that attitude, nothing would ever advance in medical science. You seem unwilling to consider anything beneficial that hasn't already gotten approved by the FDA which you hold as some holy, unbiased, completely objective body. How does anything make it from not medicine to medicine with your logic? You make it a black and white thing. It's in progress. I think history will prove that DMT is a very viable fix for mental health trauma. As an IT guy, I can appreciate anything that involves a reboot which DMT provides the closest thing in our brains to that. Our current drug plans for the mentally ill are the equivalent of loading more anti-virus programs, more bloated security suites, and garbage software that may fix one issue but cause 3 more and generally cause the system to run like shit. Fuckin' reboot fixes it 95% of the time. Our brains shut down and reboot every night. It fixes most issues. Some more serious ones need a bigger dose of that very same chemical. How is that not logical?
Haven't used in decades and I was never into psychedelics. Google MAPS MDMA or PTSD DMT.
Izo's claim is that anything that isn't FDA approved is 'alternative medicine" and thus is bullshit. I'm not surprised at all that you'd buy into something so retarded. In the mean time, I got a garlic enema to take so i can live until I am 150.
Nice try, Araysar. THC, MDMA and DMT are not new drugs. They have been refined and chemically altered to some extent - and we do use some of them. The goal is to reduce adverse effects such as psychedelia. While this might not be apparent to you, think of MS patients.
You're putting words into my mouth. I did not say any of this. You're misinterpreting my words. What you 'think' has no merit on what real science is. Your IT analogies to human physiology are laughable. You might not be a conspiracy nut, sure. You might just be seriously ill informed about the FDA and have a very poor understanding of biology - or you're making a bad attempt at trolling. In short, leave drug R&D and approval to those who do understand biology. Mkay? Mkay.
Have you tried asking Grumath? He seems to know an awful lot about it. Kinda like how a used car salesman knows what car is great for you.
What is a rape induced crime? Is that when a dad kills the bastard who raped his daughter? I don't think we should try to reduce those unless we do it by reducing the rapes themselves.
