Unless DICE has something awesome up their sleeve for the multiplayer, they, EA and this "sequel" can all go fuck themselves down the toilet.I don't think I can buy an military FPS just for the campaign though. Hopefully they've made enough changes to make the multiplayer a new and engaging experience over BC2/BF3.
You never evac from a HOT LZ without superior suppressing fire (ie orbiting gun platform/2nd bird) during extraction -- the bird was alone (against "normal" standards), so it's clear the avenue of egress for retrieval at the primary LZ or find another LZ/way out.Why didn't they get into the helicopter when it first arrived. Why do they have to fight for another 10 minutes with the help of said helicopter to reach a rooftop to enter the helicopter?
And Dead Space 1 and 2 were good until Dead Space 3.What are you specifically saying sucked? I would agree that their campaign missions were ass for bf3. But the multiplayer is pretty stellar compared to any other fps out there.
EA's track record seems to be pretty solid for the battlefield series of games. While their DLC and expansions are generally overpriced imo, they quickly become reasonable.
My friend was recently able to get BF3 and all DLC for 25 dollars.
IGN is stating its their Frostbite 3 engine, however they are also saying that there is no mention of the next gen consoles, only PC, Xbox360 and Ps3.Bad company 2 was the pinnacle of BF franchise IMO. Bf3, I think they missed the mark. I still played if for 200+ hours though. someone mentioned that this was a new engine? I dont think so. I think this is still frostbite 2 isnt it?