Butthurt white guys, an Asian virgin and an angry lesbian walk into a bar...

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Patterns like rape being at a 40 year low? You mean patterns like that, cocksucker?

You analyze "patterns" like a two-bit fortune teller analyzes the palm of a hand. You invent these sweeping cultural narratives out of thin air, based solely on your feelings, and then you try and push it and arbitrarily apply it to every situation. You can't cite a study or any statistics because you don't have any that support your position. The arrogance is just mind boggling.
I didn't "invent sweeping cultural narratives out of thin air based solely on my feelings", you dolt. What makes one culture different from another? How did they get that way? Sure, in a global sense access to resources and rate of socioeconomic development play their roles, but on an individual basis the way you think is formed and shaped by what you see and hear (and, to a lesser extent, smell, taste and feel) every day. This isn't fucking rocket science. Yes, chemicals can have an effect on how you think, but they just "tweak" what's already there. The development of thought processes and the formation and reinforcement of neural pathways don't occur by having LSD sprayed in your face. They occur through constant exposure to stimuli. Where does that stimuli come from? From our surroundings, up to and including people we speak to, movies, literature, video games, commercials, music, and any other product of our culture. Sure, individually we each develop differently due both to differing inherent genetic traits and the uniqueness of what we are exposed to, but this "cultural pool" of stimuli we draw from often has observable and definable traits across the board that we will be exposed to whether or not we choose to be. Why is it so difficult to understand that this has an effect on how we think? How could it possibly not? Why do you think in English? Because that was the default language wired into your brain at birth? Because you had "English-flavored" LSD sprayed in you face as a baby? Where else could it come from? Spiritual intervention? Come on, man, go ahead and call me arrogant, but that's far better than being ignorant, you obtuse little twat.
 

Sebudai

Ssraeszha Raider
12,022
22,504
I didn't "invent sweeping cultural narratives out of thin air based solely on my feelings", you dolt. What makes one culture different from another? How did they get that way? Sure, in a global sense access to resources and rate of socioeconomic development play their roles, but on an individual basis the way you think is formed and shaped by what you see and hear (and, to a lesser extent, smell, taste and feel) every day. This isn't fucking rocket science. Yes, chemicals can have an effect on how you think, but they just "tweak" what's already there. The development of thought processes and the formation and reinforcement of neural pathways don't occur by having LSD sprayed in your face. They occur through constant exposure to stimuli. Where does that stimuli come from? From our surroundings, up to and including people we speak to, movies, literature, video games, commercials, music, and any other product of our culture. Sure, individually we each develop differently due both to differing inherent genetic traits and the uniqueness of what we are exposed to, but this "cultural pool" of stimuli we draw from often has observable and definable traits across the board that we will be exposed to whether or not we choose to be. Why is it so difficult to understand that this has an effect on how we think? How could it possibly not? Why do you think in English? Because that was the default language wired into your brain at birth? Because you had "English-flavored" LSD sprayed in you face as a baby? Where else could it come from? Spiritual intervention? Come on, man, go ahead and call me arrogant, but that's far better than being ignorant, you obtuse little twat.
Hey fuckshit, the arrogance comes into play when you start making claims about theexactway these stimuli affect each of us. Claims supported by nothing more than yourfeelings. Claims that literally contradict all evidence. Acknowledging that there is such a thing as culture and that we are all shaped by our surroundings in one way or another is one thing. It's entirely another to start making assertions as to theexact wayeach of us is affected by our surroundings. The latter is what you're doing, and you're literally making shit up as you go along based only on your feelings. It's not even pseudo-science. It's something worse.

You've decided that our culture teaches men that we are owed sex. How did you decide this? You pulled it right out of your ass, that's how. And you couldn't even bother to present this assertion as an opinion. You presented it as though it was a fact. You're full of shit. You're an embarrassment to the Left. Get the fuck off this forum.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,388
I just want to reiterate that Mist, who is being a champion against male privilege, basically was as sexist as could be saying nurses can only be females....
I did not say that at all. It was an example. But a female nurses is more likely to be a single parent than a male nurse, and therefore need childcare.
 

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,763
I did not say that at all. It was an example. But a female nurses is more likely to be a single parent than a male nurse, and therefore need childcare.
Every male nurse my wife works with is a single parent oddly enough.

You even went so far as to make nurses predominately female but also single mothers .....

Keep tossing out bullshit generalities and painting other women into a exist corner. It is true that women hold down other women more than any man could!
 

Lejina

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
<Bronze Donator>
4,674
12,183
... and somehow those single parent female nurses don't use the roads to get to the daycare then to the hospital. Road usage is a male thing.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,388
Every male nurse my wife works with is a single parent oddly enough.

You even went so far as to make nurses predominately female but also single mothers .....

Keep tossing out bullshit generalities and painting other women into a exist corner. It is true that women hold down other women more than any man could!
I did not say any of those things. I'm just saying an example of someone who would need access to drop off their kids even earlier than other people need to go to work. The article says they weren't plowing out the childcare centers.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,388
I didn't say that. You guys have the worst fucking reading comprehension in the world.
 

Leadsalad

Cis-XYite-Nationalist
6,148
12,613
I did not say that at all. It was an example. But a female nurses is more likely to be a single parent than a male nurse, and therefore need childcare.
I didn't say that. You guys have the worst fucking reading comprehension in the world.
Really?

Now I really want an answer. Before it was just a joke rhetorical comment.

But since you've chosen to fly the cunt flag high with Manboobsah, answer why you put that piece of shit line in there about women being hypergamerous trash and not having a stable family before deciding to spawn state funded minions of hell out of their 15 minute waiting period parking spot vaginas?
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,388
All I did was make 1 simple example of where a vital support worker might need access to a specific service that the article lists as not being plowed, and you turned a specific example into me making a gross generalization.

I'm done with this thread.
 

Siddar

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
6,457
6,003
I think Mist was saying is females are more likely to be custodial single parents then men and that they would be ones taking children to daycare more often.

The article though juxtaposes roads as male and daycare parking as female. That is bullshit because females had to use the same supposedly male roads to get to those the supposedly female parking lots in the first place. Now if the local strip clubs parking lot was being plowed at government expense and daycare centers were not then there would be a argument to be made. But as its made in the article its a clear example of female privilege if we classify day care parking lots as a female area.
 

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition
<Prior Amod>
19,525
72,214
All I did was make 1 simple example of where a vital support worker might need access to a specific service that the article lists as not being plowed, and you turned a specific example into me making a gross generalization.

I'm done with this thread.
The article did not say that.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,388
I think Mist was saying is females are more likely to be custodial single parents then men and that they would be ones taking children to daycare more often.

The article though juxtaposes roads as male and daycare parking as female. That is bullshit because females had to use the same roads to get to the parking lot in the first place. Now if the local strip clubs parking lot was being plowed at government expense and daycare centers were not then there would be a argument to be made. But as its made in the article its a clear example of female privilege if we classify day care parking lots as a female area.
A lot of people just walk in European cities. This isn't America we're talking about.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,388
The article did not say that.
"Inspired by authorities in the municipality of Karlskoga, Helld?n explained that snowploughs in Stockholm typically target areas frequented by men, such as the roads, rather than entries to day cares, footpaths, and cycle paths, which are more often used by women.

In Karlskoga, central Sweden, the local government last year shifted the priorities of its snow removal practices to put more emphasis on areas often frequented by women. The move didn't incur any extra cost and has produced promising results."
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
I was going to post a whole thing attacking mist, but then I realized that if the roads are plowed but the entries are not, all that Mist's fictitious nurse has to do was walk the kid from the street to the daycare. I know silly male logic.
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
"Inspired by authorities in the municipality of Karlskoga, Helld?n explained that snowploughs in Stockholm typically target areas frequented by men, such as the roads, rather than entries to day cares, footpaths, and cycle paths, which are more often used by women.

In Karlskoga, central Sweden, the local government last year shifted the priorities of its snow removal practices to put more emphasis on areas often frequented by women. The move didn't incur any extra cost and has produced promising results."
Does the article says anything about nurses not making to work? Or was that a creation of your imagination?
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,202
23,388
Jesus fucking christ. It was just one fucking example of how a woman might need these services before she could get to work.

The article even says that it costs nothing and proved positive.

Are you just going to rip even the simplest sentence apart over your own terrible reading comprehension?
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,943
138,368
Jesus fucking christ. It was just one fucking example of how a woman might need these services before she could get to work.

The article even says that it costs nothing and proved positive.

Are you just going to rip even the simplest sentence apart over your own terrible reading comprehension?
ROADS.........................