No, I am arguing and the statistics back it up, that more kids are molested by public school teachers than have ever been molested by priests yet we ignore it.Is he really suggesting that more than 2 percent of teachers molest kids?
Number of teachers? No. The number of kids, yes it is in those articles and sourced. It breaks down the percentages of what faculty members molest though, teachers, principals, janitors, etc...Is there an article there that gives a percentage to the number of teachers that molest their students? Honest question. Because I can only find percentages for students that have experienced sexual abuse. It's hard to compare those statistics
I didn't give the Catholic church a pass ever. They are despicable. What I won't do is give them the raw end of the stick and let the teachers get a pass like the majority of people do.Hey man, I admitted to not reading the links at least. I kinda jumped in the conversation late, so I apologize. I'll read your links. It was more your reasoning that the size of the church and absolute number of priest gives them a pass that I was arguing against anyway... I still don't know what an SJW is though
Oh, I'm definitely not one of thoseSJW = Social Justice Warrior AKA Mist
I guess I'm just saying the different types of stats are hard to compare, so you can't definitively say one is worse than the other (but as Tanoomba and someone else said, it's kind of irrelevant in the long run). Honestly man, we probably agree more or lessNo, I am arguing and the statistics back it up, that more kids are molested by public school teachers than have ever been molested by priests yet we ignore it.
Number of teachers? No. The number of kids, yes it is in those articles and sourced. It breaks down the percentages of what faculty members molest though, teachers, principals, janitors, etc...
Scientists, engineers and techs in the oil field are basically problem solving all day long. How is that not a good environment to measure creativity?"Findings are based on an experiment involving male and female college students working together in groups, as well as data gathered in the field from 50 teams of scientists, engineers and technicians at a global oil and gas company."
Not exactly the samples I'd use to measure "creativity." I'd be interested in studying the external validity of their results. Also their working definition of creativity seems to just be "amount of contribution" without regard for quality of contribution.
Meh, it was in response to her list of things that would be so much better without men. I knew she had put zero research into the topic of children being molested and just automatically hates any church that doesn't accept her because she is a lesbian.Nobody comes to this thread to read you argue about who rapes more kids a_skeleton_03. We come here to read mist say retarded and hateful shit because she is a sad, lonely person.
So that isn't a valid reason to hate the church? The way they pushed legislation against homosexuals for fucking centuries and still haven't stopped?automatically hates any church that doesn't accept her because she is a lesbian.
Her foaming at the mouth about the catholic church is pretty much the straight rational position for anyone at all educated on them and doesn't even require the mention of child abuse.Her foaming at the mouth hatred for the Catholic church is comical.
Ahh so basically you just sit around and wait for something to lash out. You parachute out when facts are brought into the discussion and then jump right in when the conversation has wound down.So that isn't a valid reason to hate the church? The way they pushed legislation against homosexuals for fucking centuries and still haven't stopped?
Or lets step away from lesbians and talk about all women. Their push against birth control and condom use even in places like Africa, even when they are in the midst of an AIDS epidemic.
Or their constant teaching that women are inferior to men, that virgins are sacred and that the loss of virginity was a horrible shame. Maybe we could also touch on their suppressing of science and attempts to shut down research on stem cells.
Or we could talk about their history of teaching that unbaptized babies were going to hell. This resulted in catholic nursemaids or servants baptizing kids (all they had to do was splash some water on their faces) and then the church would come in and STEAL the kids if they were living in a non-catholic home.
Her foaming at the mouth about the catholic church is pretty much the straight rational position for anyone at all educated on them and doesn't even require the mention of child abuse.
You are literally doing it right fucking now dipshit. Jesus.Her foaming at the mouth hatred (and yours) is comical because there probably isn't even one poster on this forum that would defend them.
Unbridled hate? A religious fundamentalist like you saying that to anyone is a joke. I am not threatening to murder anyone for not being an atheist. I'm not stealing children to indoctrinate them in my particular brand of fairytales. I'm not constantly telling anyone that doesn't believe in my fairytales that they are going to spend an eternity in torture.When will you stop the unbridled hate while giving free passes to all your secular teacher friends?
Really? I am defending the Catholic church? I am pointing out realities.You are literally doing it right fucking now dipshit. Jesus.
Unbridled hate? A religious fundamentalist like you saying that to anyone is a joke. I am not threatening to murder anyone for not being an atheist. I'm not stealing children to indoctrinate them in my particular brand of fairytales. I'm not constantly telling anyone that doesn't believe in my fairytales that they are going to spend an eternity in torture.
You self-appointing yourself the authority on what the Bible says is pretty funny. As anyone with any education knows, it was thrown together from a variety of sources, with many sources left out arbitrarily. It has had constant additions and it is riddled with mistaken translations, many of which have been used to justify abuse for centuries.NOW debate on whether the Bible says this or that or accepts this or that lifestyle or action and I will tell you if it does or does not.
I care, because crazy nutjobs like you try and push your particular brand of fairytales onto other people. You and your mentioning of "souls" to justify opposition to cloning research. Other peoples (probably your opinion to) opposition to things like stem cell research or other methods of birth control. Your "doubts" about carbon dating and belief in flood geology.You don't believe in it through so why should you care?
Come on Iannis, you are smarter than this. How many people have been killed for arguing with the church? Reality please.I'll defend the Catholic Church on the issue of contraception and homosexuality.
If you don't like it then try to change it. It works. The church is changeable. It's not new or special or specific to any particular issue.
Yes, it says that in many parts of the world, they have lost their power. However, in parts where they have not, they are still legislating laws against homosexuals, against any form of birth control, against abortions.The fact that participation is voluntary for this generation should speak silent volumes.
I didn't self appoint myself the only authority. I have done a lot of studies though and nobody else is taking this stance on the forums. Find me another person on the forum that is pro-Bible and has spent any time in seminary or the like. I will wait.You self-appointing yourself the authority on what the Bible says is pretty funny. As anyone with any education knows, it was thrown together from a variety of sources, with many sources left out arbitrarily. It has had constant additions and it is riddled with mistaken translations, many of which have been used to justify abuse for centuries.
However, don't let me stop you. Random religious people deciding that they can divine truth from all the contradictions in the Bible is what causes so much fucking problems, so I'm not shocked you would jump to it. It seems never to occur to these people that if they were the word of God, they probably wouldn't be so easy to mistranslate.
I care, because crazy nutjobs like you try and push your particular brand of fairytales onto other people. You and your mentioning of "souls" to justify opposition to cloning research. Other peoples (probably your opinion to) opposition to things like stem cell research or other methods of birth control. Your "doubts" about carbon dating and flood geology.
If all religious people like you stuck to themselves, instead of constantly trying to enshrine it in law or culture and push it on other people, I wouldn't care so much. Well, other than you indoctrinating poor children to a life of bigotry and hatred under the guise of "loving one another".
Who is defending Saddam Hussein as a legitimate source of social mores?How many people were killed for arguing with Saddam Hussein? Reality please.