Mist, your posts are so stupid they are literally raping me. Please stop before I have to carry my computer around on my shoulders all day as a protest.
And, that is the meat of the issue Mist. The whole concept of there being an imminent threat of physical coercion is cast in serious doubt when we have evidence showing someone consistently inviting the suspect over for more sex. And acting emotionally normal, and loving after an allegedly shocking encounter.Right, which is why at the start of this conversation I tried to move it off this young woman's clearly bullshit case onto a different and hypothetical case.
What this says to me is "I too would take advantage of a vulnerable person to get something that I want, therefore I think we should keep protecting the rights of abusers and blaming the victim."Mist, you are solving a problem that isn't a problem. Bad experiences aren't fun, but you learn from them.
For instance, if a woman does things she finds unpleasant for the sake of a partner and later finds out her partner was a d-bag that didn't really care about her, that is a learning opportunity. From this, she should learn to value herself more, know her boundaries and stick to them, seek partners that take her feelings into account and work to judge character better. Unless the guy was doing something she specifically said "no" to and used force or threats to do it anyway, it isn't rape, assault or really even abuse. It is what shechoseto tolerate pursuing what shewanted. Emphasis on it beingher choice.
Frankly, it seems to me you are taking away agency from these women. They have choices to make, they choose poorly, and you want to patronize them by unjustly punishing the person who hurt their feelings, but never took away their ability to choose. Hurt feelings teach important lessons. Taking away consequences encourages bad or stupid behavior.
Give us some facts so we know what you're even arguing. "Abusive" isn't specific enough. What type of conduct are you referring to?You guys are sticking to the bullshit case that I said was bullshit in the first place.
That is because you are jumping all over the place. Outline the scenario where you think the system is failing, then describe where and why so we can converse from a common point.You guys are sticking to the bullshit case that I said was bullshit in the first place.
Also known as sales"I too would take advantage of a vulnerable person to get something that I want"
I never once said that women don't lie, or that women aren't crazy and make shit up, or anything like that, because those are absurd arguments. What I proposed is a thought experiment for setting up a system that protects as many people as possible on either side of the equation, because I think the current system is deficient.There being a non-trivial amount of men out there abusing women is an easily accepted fact, but the notion that a non-trivial amount of women would lie out of spite or personal gain is fantasy land.
That about sum up what we're dealing with here?
No one here is arguing in relation to specifically this case. Also this case isnt unique once and a lifetime case either, this is common(id put money on the vast majority of college rape cases being nothing more than he said she said) in college and and the rest of the world.A clever sociopath knows how to get away with abusing people. How do you protect society from these people?
You guys keep talking specifically in terms of this case, which I already said was bullshit, rather than engaging in a general argument.
LOL this shit goes both ways, sister. How many women out there taking advantage of vulnerable good men to get what they want? How many women are mentally and even physically abusing men? I know two in my immediate family. Poor snowflakes, yeah right.What this says to me is "I too would take advantage of a vulnerable person to get something that I want, therefore I think we should keep protecting the rights of abusers and blaming the victim."
Again, works both ways. You can ruin your own life by accusing someone who's 100% beyond any doubt guilty of rape.No one here is arguing in relation to specifically this case. Also this case isnt unique once and a lifetime case either, this is common(id put money on the vast majority of college rape cases being nothing more than he said she said) in college and and the rest of the world.
When youre dealing with crimes that;
1) Can leave very little if any evidence
2) Have profound impact on just being a suspect, let alone even being charged
3) People lie about the crime happeningALL THE TIME
What exactly do you expect? Fact is you can very easily ruins someones life(as much as rape can ruin someones life...) by just even suspecting someone of rape.
Actually, it is counter to my nature. I've been on the wrong end of bad situations, and had to learn a lesson from them. But those lessons were valuable. If someone coddled me every time something bad happened to me, I would never learn to grow a thicker skin, stand up for myself, value my time, choose better friends and SOs, etc.What this says to me is "I too would take advantage of a vulnerable person to get something that I want, therefore I think we should keep protecting the rights of abusers and blaming the victim."
And the difference is, I wouldn't want a system set up to defend those women.LOL this shit goes both ways, sister. How many women out there taking advantage of vulnerable good men to get what they want? How many women are mentally and even physically abusing men? I know two in my immediate family. Poor snowflakes, yeah right.
Do you really think there is symmetry there? Really?Again, works both ways. You can ruin your own life by accusing someone who's 100% beyond any doubt guilty of rape.
Allowing for a legal recourse is not coddling. Do you think rape victims WANT to be on the stand having everything they've ever done in their life called into question?Actually, it is counter to my nature. I've been on the wrong end of bad situations, and had to learn a lesson from them. But those lessons were valuable. If someone coddled me every time something bad happened to me, I would never learn to grow a thicker skin, stand up for myself, value my time, choose better friends and SOs, etc.
Dealing with adversity is a valuable skill.
Stay on topic. That's not the situation I proposed at all.Allowing for a legal recourse is not coddling. Do you think rape victims WANT to be on the stand having everything they've ever done in their life called into question?