dont go pointing out the massive logical inconsistencies in the legal system.Woman becomes voluntarily intoxicated and then voluntarily has sex, but claims rape because she regrets it later. Woman is deemed faultless for her actions as she was not in a position to consent.
Woman becomes voluntarily intoxicated and then voluntarily gets behind the wheel of a car and then hits and kills a pedestrian. Woman is held accountable for her actions and then convicted.
Conclusion: Women shouldn't drive.
Thought rape is a thing. Stop being so misogynistic. Christ.If you think about a girl and she didn't consent you to think about her, did you rape her?
It's a grey area and grey areas are where rape happens.if you're fighting a Vagina monster off with your dick, and you stab the Vagina monster, that's rape right?
If I read 50 Shades of Grey, am I raping the author?It's a grey area and grey areas are where rape happens.
Alright, let's talk legal then. Believe it or not, consent can't legally be given when drunk. Fuck a drunk person, and it's entirely up to them to decide whether or not they've been raped. Yes, it's up to them to decide whether or not you've committed a crime and they've got the law on their side. You can't defend yourself in court by saying "But she said yes when she was drunk! According tome, that's not rape!" and walk out of the courtroom. You may not like it but yes, the examples I gave are pretty equivalent in that theybothfall into "grey zones".One of those is illegal and the other isn't. Taking advantage of drunk girls is practically an NCAA sport. Calling rape falsely is an actual crime.
Yes these things are equivalent. GOOD JOB YOU FUCKING IDIOT.
The vast majority of alcohol-fueled sexual encounters are pleasant for both parties involved, because in most cases both sides act like responsible adults who know what they're doing. If, like the majority of human beings, you've found ways to sleep with people that involve alcohol and DON'T end in rape charges (questionable or otherwise), congratulations! You're a regular fucking human being. If you can't handle this kind of responsibility or are terrified of what MIGHT happen, I refer you to the above rules that keep EVERYBODY happy.I called up a friend of mine and apologized for raping her when we had a couple drinks and hooked up several years ago. She was surprisingly understanding considering the horrible trauma I must have put her through.
According to you? lol.You do a disservice to all humans, you should probably stay out of the argument entirely. By the very act of participating in any discussion, you make your side look worse.
Actually they don't and you're fucking stupid. If the girl admits that she consented (albeit drunk), then thats NOT FUCKING RAPE. IN ANY COURT. The only time consent wouldn't be valid (or lack of objection, more to the point) would be when they are so drunk that they are practically unconscious.Alright, let's talk legal then. Believe it or not, consent can't legally be given when drunk. Fuck a drunk person, and it's entirely up to them to decide whether or not they've been raped. Yes, it's up to them to decide whether or not you've committed a crime and they've got the law on their side. You can't defend yourself in court by saying "But she said yes when she was drunk! According tome, that's not rape!" and walk out of the courtroom. You may not like it but yes, the examples I gave are pretty equivalent in that theybothfall into "grey zones".