Butthurt white guys, an Asian virgin and an angry lesbian walk into a bar...

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
J

Jais

Trakanon Raider
1,896
535
Mist_sl said:
If any evidence of the crime existed, you would still want to have it investigated, and if the perpetrator was identified, you would still want a judge or jury to rule on the case.

I'm not saying the accuser should be always found right or the accused always found guilty; that's what we have investigations and courts for, to determine guilt. But a reportable crime definitely happened. And you wouldn't worry about what would happen to the reputation of the guy who stole your car if you accused him, yet woman are constantly asked to think of the reputation of the men they accuse of crimes before filing a police report.
Click to expand...
A reportable crime definitely happened because I felt it did? And all we're asking of women is to be decent humans and not accuse men of rape because said women felt it was rape.

My definition of rape, physically forcing (like fucking holding down while she's resisting) or fucking a KOed broad.

Either way, you're either an actual woman or a troll, it's hard to tell.
 
Cad

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,426
49,042
Mist_sl said:
Access to a woman's body is clearly worth about 20 bucks. A BJ from a toothless mulatto tranny costs more than that.
Click to expand...
Implies mulattoes BJ's are worth less than other trannies, clear racism. Plz moderate
 
TrollfaceDeux

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
isn't black whore cheaper than a white whore. i am thinking a huge supply of black whores and smaller supply of white whores.
 
Mist

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,199
23,383
Trollface_sl said:
They are asked to think if the reputation of the man because of the shit they will go through once they start the process, you trolling faggot. It's like giving them an advice about what is about to happen and what you will be going through. Let's not fucking forget Duke Lacrosse case where he was falsely accused and his reputation completely fucking destroyed despite the fact that the accuser willfully admitted her lies. And all the free shit the cunt got for making false accusation. You make me sick, you cunt.
Click to expand...
rape_infographic.jpg


(There's a few minor statistical problems with the chart in question, both in favor and against the point, the number of unreported rates is slightly inflated, but the number of false accusations is also slightly inflated, but it's very close to accurate.)
 
TrollfaceDeux

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
Mist_sl said:
rape_infographic.jpg


(There's a few minor statistical problems with the chart in question, both in favor and against the point, the number of unreported rates is slightly inflated, but the number of false accusations is also slightly inflated, but it's very close to accurate.)
Click to expand...
look at all those rapist.

false accusation varies by stats. by most stats, it varies between 5-10%. the crucial retort to your suggestion was your belief that somehow, women face challenges when accusing someone of rape and get pushed aside for being a slut cunt.

Nope. Two sides. 1) White knights will rail behind her. 2) Other women will feel jealous of the attention she is getting. hence, the slut shaming.
 
Cad

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,426
49,042
Mist_sl said:
rape_infographic.jpg


(There's a few minor statistical problems with the chart in question, both in favor and against the point, the number of unreported rates is slightly inflated, but the number of false accusations is also slightly inflated, but it's very close to accurate.)
Click to expand...
lol
 
Mist

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,199
23,383
Trollface_sl said:
look at all those rapist.

false accusation varies by stats. by most stats, it varies between 5-10%.
Click to expand...
The chart should say rapes, not rapists. It would be accurate then, but still overestimate the number of false accusations. The 5-10% figure is of rapes that go to trial.
 
Cad

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,426
49,042
Gavinrad_sl said:
How exactly do you track unreported rapes.
Click to expand...
You pull some figures out of your ass and then extrapolate from the reported rapes, more than 2/3rds of which the police decline to bring charges against because of lack of evidence...

If you extrapolate enough, you pretty much have to figure I'm raping someone right now under my desk while typing this. Us men sure are busy raping.
 
TrollfaceDeux

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
Mist_sl said:
The chart should say rapes, not rapists. It would be accurate then, but still overestimate the number of false accusations. 5-10% is of REPORTED rapes.
Click to expand...
bro, we are going by your shitty chart. put up better one if you got one, faggot.

also

480px-Blackstones-ratio.jpg
 
Arbitrary

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
28,981
79,573
Let's see what the FBI says about false rape accusations.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/dnaevid.txt

Every year since 1989, in about 25 percent of the
sexual assault cases referred to the FBI where
results could be obtained (primarily by State and
local law enforcement), the primary suspect has
been excluded by forensic DNA testing.
Specifically, FBI officials report that out of
roughly 10,000 sexual assault cases since 1989,
about 2,000 tests have been inconclusive (usually
insufficient high molecular weight DNA to do
testing), about 2,000 tests have excluded the
primary suspect, and about 6,000 have "matched" or
included the primary suspect.1 The fact that these
percentages have remained constant for 7 years, and
that the National Institute of Justice's informal
survey of private laboratories reveals a strikingly
similar 26-percent exclusion rate, strongly
suggests that postarrest and postconviction DNA
exonerations are tied to some strong, underlying
systemic problems that generate erroneous
accusations and convictions.
Click to expand...
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Cad_sl said:
Actually they don't and you're fucking stupid. If the girl admits that she consented (albeit drunk), then thats NOT FUCKING RAPE. IN ANY COURT. The only time consent wouldn't be valid (or lack of objection, more to the point) would be when they are so drunk that they are practically unconscious.

I'll grant you that chicks scream rape at anything and everything, but if you can find me some case law saying "drunk = no consent" then I'm with you. Until then, shut the fuck up you fucking imbecilic twat.
Click to expand...
Quick Google search gave me this:

Wyoming Law_sl said:
Wyoming law states that ?if a victim is physically helpless, and the actor (perpetrator) knows or reasonably should know that the victim is physically helpless and that the victim has not consented,? it is sexual assault. Further, if ?the actor knows or should reasonably know that the victim through mental illness, mental deficiency or developmental disability,? then the actor is incapable of determining true consent to sexual behavior. Intoxication can render a person both mentally and physically helpless ? and therefore incapable of consenting to sexual assault.
Click to expand...
This, too:

Sexual Trauma Services_sl said:
When intoxicated, an individual cannot legally consent to sexual activity.
Click to expand...

Speaking about whether someone has to face the consequences of choices made while drunk, I found this interesting tidbit:

Findlaw_sl said:
If a person signs a contract while drunk or under the influence of drugs, can that contract be enforced? Courts are usually not very sympathetic to people who claim they were intoxicated when they signed a contract. Generally a court will only allow the contract to be avoidedif the other party to the contract knew about the intoxication and took advantage of the intoxicated person, or if the person was somehow involuntarily intoxicated (e.g. someone spiked the punch).
Click to expand...
So if someone takes advantage of your drunkenness to get you to sign a contract, youcanbe found not legally responsible for the contract. You know, because you weredrunk, for fuck's sake, anddrunk people are easy to take advantage of.
 
Mist

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,199
23,383
Arbitrary_sl said:
Let's see what the FBI says about false rape accusations.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/dnaevid.txt
Click to expand...
Report date 1996. We have both better statistics and I think DNA evidence is a bit better now.

Reading further, it's also a report about something completely irrelevant. It's some organizations using legal babel trying to call into question DNA evidence, back when DNA evidence was still controversial.

It's also of a sample CONVICTED rape cases, so look back at my chart. My chart is still accurate using your own report.
 
Arbitrary

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
28,981
79,573
If Cad feels like it he can fucking destroy your retarded Googling. He's done it before. On this exact topic.

Why are you even bothering.
 
Mist

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,199
23,383
Edited above post. You should read your own material before you link it. Your link supports my argument if you actually read it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.