Civilization 7

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Denamian

Night Janitor
<Nazi Janitors>
7,532
20,884
Funny how yang screams just like everyone else when it's his turn to go into the torture chamber.

So much for controlling the output.

Yang is usually my bro if I'm not playing him.. All the drones become cogs in my unholy machine of death.
 

yerm

Golden Baronet of the Realm
6,534
16,746
I basically always run green so police state is covered for nicely. Getting police effect doubled can be huge. Also yangs free defense kinda makes him annoying to rush or bully. So, yeah, yang is a bro.
 

Kuro

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
9,071
23,958

TL;DW
-Great People are now eligible to be Leaders of civilization, not just people who actually lead nations. So you can have cultural leaders, scientific thought leaders, whatnot.
-Game is broken up into Ancient, Exploration, and Modern ages that you can either play sequentially or separately.
-Civilizations are era-specific, and when the era ends in campaign mode you have to pick a new Civ for the new era, from a list of options based on flags you triggered in the previous era. Goal is to make your civ feel good whatever era you're playing, which was previously difficult to do with different tech/special units coming at different stages of the game. You get to pick some of your policies/traits you acquired in the previous era to carry forward with your new civ. Your leader stays the same through the campaign.
-Still looked to have tech tree as usual, same hexes as Civ 6 for world map. Policy page they showed looked real stripped back, but might have been early turns.
-Districts gone, buildings function like Districts did. Basically skipping the middle-man.
-Doomstacks are back, lead by military characters.
-You can sail up (some) rivers.
-New system of founding Villages that grow into Cities later? I assume it means Settlers are cheaper so you can grab early resources/locations easier.
-Tin back composing the main theme
-Locking cosmetics behind using their separate log-in portal.
-Battle passes and preorder bonus races.
-February 2025 release
-Pretty sure one of the speakers is a gargoyle shooting the interview during the night.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users

Pharazon2

Trakanon Raider
706
1,152
I wish doomstacks are back but my understanding is they are not. The commanders will allow you to pack up a limited number of units to move around, then unpack them when you're ready to fight - but they are unpacked into separate tiles still. Definitely an improvement because half of the downside of 1UPT is the tedium of moving units around... but it is not the return of stacks, unfortunately. I'll wait to hear more on how this plays out.

The changing civs thing after each era... not sure i've heard anybody excited about it. I don't get the point.

Gwendolin Christie as narrator is lame. At the start of the vid they were like "Who would your dream narrator for Civ VII be?" and i got excited for a half second to see if it was somebody awesome before they revealed it to be... her.
 

...

Goonsquad Officer
6,193
14,526
I have no faith they can improve the series at this point. They peaked with beyond the sword
 
  • 1Picard
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

Bubbles

2022 Asshat Award Winner
<Bronze Donator>
45,876
-59,551
I'm cautiously optimistic about this one. Already looks better than 6.

 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

faille

Molten Core Raider
1,859
458
I'll still get this because I'm a sucker for the series and the genre as a whole but can't say I'm overly excited after this reveal. IT feels like like they are copying a bunch of stuff from other games in the genre, which would be fine if they were amazing, except none of them set the world on fire.

civ4lyfe!
 

turbo

Molten Core Raider
1,259
115
I used to rent civ at the local movie store for a week at a crack on SNES (or was it NES?) trying to make sure i had the highest leader scope since it was cartridge based saves back in the day! Loved that game so much...each iteration I play abunch but slowly have derived less joy.

Switching Civ's between era's sounds fucking horrible, sure there is plus's to balancing but conceptually that by itself makes me not want to play. It erodes the whole concept of the game...start as fucking cave men with fire and build my people into nuclear war capable assholes pretending to send people to space while I stockpile and start world war III. Swapping civ's sounds just meh

I hope they do a better job on the ingame custom map editor. I love jumping to the highest difficultly and giving myself parameters like i can change 15 tiles to whatever I want with whatever resources and pick 2 early techs so I build a super city. Civ 6 its way more complex then it needs to be with all sorts of bugs and then you spend 30 mins making a map but cant get it to play in your actual game etc.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

Falstaff

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
8,435
3,380
Civ 1 on our Macintosh computer is some of the best video game memories I have as a kid. Definitely gave me an appreciation for world history that most other kids my age never had.
I really want to get back into these games but haven't played since Civ 3... I own 4 and all the expansions on Steam and 6 seems to only be $5 so maybe I'll pick it up.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
81,086
162,261
I got thousands of hours in Civ 5-6 and probably couple more hundred in previous iterations. Some of features sound interesting but there just isnt enough to bring me back.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

TheBeagle

JunkiesNetwork Donor
8,864
30,699
Ya my introduction to the series was 3, loved it and then sunk hundreds of hours into both 4 and 5. Could never really get into 6 like the other ones, even with going back and trying the all the expansions.

I'm sure I'll pick it up and give it a shot but not feeling stoked about it, seems like it will be more of the same.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
81,086
162,261
I think my turn off for recent Civ series is just because it has become too much like a board game on a PC. It's over simplified, overtly-cartoonish.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 2 users

velk

Trakanon Raider
2,662
1,248
Switching Civ's between era's sounds fucking horrible, sure there is plus's to balancing but conceptually that by itself makes me not want to play. It erodes the whole concept of the game...start as fucking cave men with fire and build my people into nuclear war capable assholes pretending to send people to space while I stockpile and start world war III. Swapping civ's sounds just me

That's just something you can do if you want to isn't it ? You don't have to do it.

It's got historical accuracy to it ( see: saxons -> english -> americans ), but I agree with you in not seeing the appeal gameplay wise. If it's optional though and other people like it, whatever.

That kind of flows through to their other changes they announced though, at best my response is lukewarm. Eliminating workers and builders, I can see how their thinking makes sense but it gives me too much in the way of WoW vibes where 'streamlining' everything ended up sucking the fun out of everything as well.

We'll see I guess - probably a few years after release when it's on sale for $10 ;p
 

Kirun

Buzzfeed Editor
19,407
15,755
I think my turn off for recent Civ series is just because it has become too much like a board game on a PC. It's over simplified, overtly-cartoonish.
I think Stellaris is the only "modern/recent" 4X game I've been able to sink long hours into for the exact same reasons. Even starting with 5 (4 to a small extent too, I guess), Civ became very cartoonish.
 

sleevedraw

Revolver Ocelot
<Bronze Donator>
2,016
5,728


This seemed like a pretty even-handed take. I largely agree with him regarding hating the UI.

TL;DR first impression seems to be that it'll be a good game, but people are questioning whether it will be a good Civ game if it cops the Humankind elements too much.
 

Kiroy

Marine Biologist
<Bronze Donator>
35,439
102,553
Civ games are always ass until at least the first dlc, usually the second
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
81,086
162,261
I think Stellaris is the only "modern/recent" 4X game I've been able to sink long hours into for the exact same reasons. Even starting with 5 (4 to a small extent too, I guess), Civ became very cartoonish.
Thats how I felt after I sunk in a couple hundred hours into EU4 (same company, same engine). It was a "big boy", historically accurate, civ building game that is incredibly detailed. After that every other civ-type game on PC felt like a kiddie Settlers of Catan port.

But I could play a whole game of Civ in a day and a single EU 4 campaign would take me months. Once I got the world conquest achievement, I barely played it again.
 
Last edited:

...

Goonsquad Officer
6,193
14,526
Judge a civ by how much they put into cgi leaders , and how much they reach to half invent fat chickes to put in
 
  • 1Double Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Furry

🌭🍔🇺🇦✌️SLAVA UKRAINI!✌️🇺🇦🍔🌭
<Gold Donor>
22,242
29,249
I just can't get into civ games any more. They were fun back in the day, but they're just too simple for me to enjoy. I'll wait for EU5.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user