- 25,757
- 50,453
Reading his posts, it seems like he backed down on talking about sex frequency at least, hah. Those are things I'd probably talk about with people right off. I talk to people about retirement, spending on things, what we think it's okay to spend on vs. not... you could tell a lot about a person by how they answer or don't answer those questions.Of course guys who have been married a long time have an idea of how to sustain a relationship.
But that's not what the conversation was about. He posted a checklist of inquiries to ask on first or early dates. It's a very rigid approach that is more robotic than romantic. He was confusing trying to determine if a woman is a good match and shares ideals with, as others have said, interviewing them expecting real answers.
And if that wasn't his intent he did a poor job conveying his advice. And that's what he was being called out on. If you sincerely expect that you can suss out what the woman sitting across from you is all about with that series of questions you'll be in for a very disappointing dating life.
And of course he couldn't help but launch straight into a hypocritical ad hominem.
You ever talk to one of those people who is just on your wavelength and you feel like you've known them forever even though you just met? Acting like yourself is how that happens. If you put on a front and wait until the 4th date to let it down, you will go on a lot of fake ass 4th dates that fizzle out whenever you drop the mask.
I think generally I'm with Oblio... just be you, even if that means running down a checklist on the 1st date. If thats how you feel, do it. You'll meet checklist babe and she will be your soulmate. Hiding your personality will get you more dates but I'd rather have more "real" dates.
- 2