Dr. Cliff Huxtable was a mega rapist

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Arcaus_sl

shitlord
1,290
3
Oh my god, someone lied to the media who was butting in on something that isn't their business? Call the fucking moral authorities, shit us getting out of hand.
 

drtyrm

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,991
155
Remember guys, it's the media's job to cover Cosby's tv show and comedy career. It's not the media's job to cover rape accusations.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
Oh my god, someone lied to the media who was butting in on something that isn't their business? Call the fucking moral authorities, shit us getting out of hand.
35 women coming out and saying Cosby raped them is none of the medias business.

You need to come up with a better Troll then that son.
 

Arcaus_sl

shitlord
1,290
3
It's not a troll. I would rather the media cover something worth while. My number of fucks given about random speculation of something we have very little facts on and no where near enough facts to make an educated decision is really low.

The problem is this will end up just like Tyson. That chick had no proof. They tried Tyson for being an ignorant and angry dude. Of course the dude is ignorant, he had an iq of like 15. That doesn't make him a rapist. They will find something similar to try Cosby on if it ever goes that far. When you have no facts you just convince the jury that it's true because he's a bad person.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
It's not a troll. I would rather the media cover something worth while.
Because obviously rape is not worthwhile, sorry to interrupt your daily viewing of the Bachelor for such trivial events.

My number of fucks given about random speculation of something we have very little facts on and no where near enough facts to make an educated decision is really low.
We have facts.

1) Bill Cosby lied for years about giving women drugs even up to last year even tho he knew that deposition was out there where he clearly said he had.
2) The women that accused Bill of rape didn't know about that deposition till this year

The problem is this will end up just like Tyson. That chick had no proof.
Which chick when it comes to Cosby? there are over 35 of them , one of them that the statute of limitations will never run out, and the same woman the LAPD are investigating him on till this day.

They tried Tyson for being an ignorant and angry dude.
They tried Tyson for rape idiot, as well as 2 more counts of criminal conduct. He went to jail for it. In what world does being ignorant, and angry get you a free get out of jail card in the USA....

Even his all star Lawyer team couldn't protect him.

rrr_img_106573.jpg
 

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
27,599
16,019
You acting like Cosby didn't have status or a reputation before this is astounding. As in, astoundingly ignorant. He was highly revered, had huge sets of fans and many comedians loved him. His legacy was incredible.

Bill Burr for example, before all this shit, has a segment where he talks about how awesome it was to meet Bill Cosby. Dude was in awe. "Like meeting the pope, but way more entertaining". "Richard Prior live in concert and Bill Cosby, run the full gammut, two perfect games (of comedy)". "I can't believe I was talking to Bill Cosby".
Bill Burr - Meeting Bill Cosby - YouTube


I have no idea what you mean by a quagmire. I think it is pretty clear what he is, a person that would drug women and rape them as they were unconscious. Sucks man, I loved the guy before all this. If a bunch of previous women that worked for him had come forward and defended him. If women had said he was really nice to them, etc. If if if, none of it happened. Instead, more and more women that met him in the past lay out the same scenario.
How am I acting like he doesn't have status? I'm acting exactly the opposite and saying in the long run it will be completely unaffected. The only thing different is that he's not getting coverage when he talks about social issues right now. Bill burr was still in awe when he met cosby, nothing has changed that. I guess it proves my point that you apparently didn't recognize those other comedians I listed. Here's a hint, they were some of the greatest comedians of the 50's and 60's. I used them because the coz was in his prime in the 70's and 80's.

I'm not sure if you realized I was talking about Glen Quagmire (giggity giggity), not boggy swamplands.

Bro his shows were on like 4 different cable networks and his comedy played all over the place. The dude is too toxic for cable networks to play reruns of his shows, some of the most iconic tv ever made. He was in the middle of a comedy tour when this thing broke out. Maybe you're right, maybe nobody cares and the media is driving the whole thing. I doubt that.
I didn't think about syndication. I'm not aware of any of his shows that were on when this broke, and I certainly don't know if any are still on the air. If they did get pulled, I expect a slight bump in sales of the DVDs.

I think the type of people who will suddenly find him not funny because he's been accused of rape are probably the types of people who didn't think he was funny to begin with.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,922
52,666
Exchanging sex for ludes does not mean you were raped. Cosby was denying being involved in the ludes fad of the late 70s. If he had instead been big into the coke craze of the 80s and been giving women coke for sex, that wouldn't be evidence of him being a rapist either.

Andrea Constand's accusation was something entirely different, what she accused him of was definitely rape. What Cosby admitted to in that deposition is still very much a scummy shade of grey, which is why I'm inclined to believe that he raped her. Which makes it likely that he raped other women, but I still have my doubts that most of those women who are accusing him were actually raped and are just jumping on the bandwagon because they are embarrassed about the fact that they used to be whores, or because they can sniff fame or money.

There was no proof Michael Jackson ever sexually abused any children, didn't stop the media and public from crucifying him. Hell, one of the people who accused him after he died actually testified in a previous case that he hadn't ever been abused by Jackson. I don't know how the hell he can even bring those accusations before a judge now without being found guilty of perjury.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
I'm acting exactly the opposite and saying in the long run it will be completely unaffected. The only thing different is that he's not getting coverage when he talks about social issues right now. Bill burr was still in awe when he met cosby, nothing has changed that. I guess it proves my point that you apparently didn't recognize those other comedians I listed. Here's a hint, they were some of the greatest comedians of the 50's and 60's. I used them because the coz was in his prime in the 70's and 80's.
You are wrong. As the Bill Burr example attests, he had plenty of stuff going on and was popular. Now no one, including Bill Burr, wants anything to do with him. His legacy is absolutely getting killed and acting like "no one knows" those other comedians is amazingly ignorant. Bill Cosby on the other hand, yeah, you are an idiot if you think this won't affect his legacy. Every story about him from now on is going to, at the very minimum, have a huge portion of it taken up by this. Yes, plenty of people don't know about great comedians from the past. To say they don't have legacies though, is dumb as shit. Cosby managed to shit all over his.

It is pretty laughable though, you try to make me sound ignorant by saying I didn't know comedians I obviously knew, yet didn't know of all of Cosby's properties or how popular he was before all this. Sad.

I'm not sure if you realized I was talking about Glen Quagmire (giggity giggity), not boggy swamplands.
This is what I didn't know you were talking about. I guess this was an attempt to be funny or something.

[
I didn't think about syndication. I'm not aware of any of his shows that were on when this broke, and I certainly don't know if any are still on the air. If they did get pulled, I expect a slight bump in sales of the DVDs.

I think the type of people who will suddenly find him not funny because he's been accused of rape are probably the types of people who didn't think he was funny to begin with.
Yes, total ignorance on your part about anything going on with the Cosby properties, yet you confidently said that his legacy wouldn't be affected. Then when your ignorance is shown, you double down. How like you.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,806
50,628
If giving women drugs and then having sex with them was rape, every nightclub and college would be full of rapists.

Oh wait.. thats what they're saying, actually.

LOL
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
Exchanging sex for ludes does not mean you were raped. Cosby was denying being involved in the ludes fad of the late 70s. If he had instead been big into the coke craze of the 80s and been giving women coke for sex, that wouldn't be evidence of him being a rapist either.
What it does prove is that Cosby lied when he said all those women that accused him were full of shit when they said he gave them drugs in any sense. So it makes their stories much more legitimate now since we don't know what else Cosby was lying about.

Before those stories could be discounted, now since that deposition is out there not so much.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,922
52,666
He denied being involved with quaaludes because he was a big anti-drug activist. You know, kinda like how queer Republicans deny sucking dick.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
... but I still have my doubts that most of those women who are accusing him were actually raped and are just jumping on the bandwagon because they are embarrassed about the fact that they used to be whores, or because they can sniff fame or money.
Now THIS is jumping to conclusions. Is there a single shred of evidence any of these women are lying? Anything at all?

35 women accuse Cosby of rape under similar circumstances which are at least partially supported by his own testimony:
"Let's not jump to conclusions, guys! We don't know the facts! Where's the evidence?"
Meanwhile, it's totally OK to assume these women are ashamed of being whores and are lying for attention and "fame", despite there being exactly ZERO facts or evidence that support that.

You can't make this stuff up.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,806
50,628
Now THIS is jumping to conclusions. Is there a single shred of evidence any of these women are lying? Anything at all?
No, but thats not how this works. We don't have to prove they are lying. They have to prove they are telling the truth.

Which they haven't done.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
No, but thats not how this works. We don't have to prove they are lying. They have to prove they are telling the truth.

Which they haven't done.
That's exactly how this works. You can't claim to be unable to come to a conclusion based on lack of evidence only when it suits you.

It's perfectly reasonable to say "We don't know" or "We can't say with certainty" when we don't have conclusive evidence. But to then accuse people of making false rape accusations with ZERO evidence supporting that claim is super-hypocritical.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,806
50,628
That's exactly how this works. You can't claim to be unable to come to a conclusion based on lack of evidence only when it suits you.

It's perfectly reasonable to say "We don't know" or "We can't say with certainty" when we don't have conclusive evidence. But to then accuse people of making false rape accusations with ZERO evidence supporting that claim is super-hypocritical.
I wouldn't accuse them of making false rape accusations without proof of such. I would say there's no evidence of their rape accusations.
 

Bentern

Trakanon Raider
18
1
Was reading through the last few pages of this thread and got a feeling of deja vu. Then I dug up the old Lance Armstrong thread and of course there was Chuk defending the cheater. What is up with you and shady celebrities?
 

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
73,140
214,416
Was reading through the last few pages of this thread and got a feeling of deja vu. Then I dug up the old Lance Armstrong thread and of course there was Chuk defending the cheater. What is up with you and shady celebrities?
i defend people who i think are being treated unfairly, these people are famous so thats why we have threads talking about them. i am against social justice lynch mobs who dont have all the facts. guilt by suspicion is bad, hmmkay?

if you had checked far back enough you probably would have seen me try to "defend" Casey Anthony.
 

Badabidi_sl

shitlord
878
0
That's exactly how this works. You can't claim to be unable to come to a conclusion based on lack of evidence only when it suits you.

It's perfectly reasonable to say "We don't know" or "We can't say with certainty" when we don't have conclusive evidence. But to then accuse people of making false rape accusations with ZERO evidence supporting that claim is super-hypocritical.
Were you in Sharpton and Jackson's corner during the Duke Lacrosse scandal also?
 

zombiewizardhawk

Potato del Grande
9,982
12,932
BREAKING NEWS GUYS. PEOPLE DON'T COME OUT AND TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT THEIR INVOLVEMENT WITH ILLEGAL SUBSTANCES.

I sure as shit don't go into my job interviews and tell the managers I used to sell coke for a couple months or that I was smoking an eighth every 2 days for about 5 years straight. Even if they ask me.