35 women coming out and saying Cosby raped them is none of the medias business.Oh my god, someone lied to the media who was butting in on something that isn't their business? Call the fucking moral authorities, shit us getting out of hand.
Because obviously rape is not worthwhile, sorry to interrupt your daily viewing of the Bachelor for such trivial events.It's not a troll. I would rather the media cover something worth while.
We have facts.My number of fucks given about random speculation of something we have very little facts on and no where near enough facts to make an educated decision is really low.
Which chick when it comes to Cosby? there are over 35 of them , one of them that the statute of limitations will never run out, and the same woman the LAPD are investigating him on till this day.The problem is this will end up just like Tyson. That chick had no proof.
They tried Tyson for rape idiot, as well as 2 more counts of criminal conduct. He went to jail for it. In what world does being ignorant, and angry get you a free get out of jail card in the USA....They tried Tyson for being an ignorant and angry dude.
How am I acting like he doesn't have status? I'm acting exactly the opposite and saying in the long run it will be completely unaffected. The only thing different is that he's not getting coverage when he talks about social issues right now. Bill burr was still in awe when he met cosby, nothing has changed that. I guess it proves my point that you apparently didn't recognize those other comedians I listed. Here's a hint, they were some of the greatest comedians of the 50's and 60's. I used them because the coz was in his prime in the 70's and 80's.You acting like Cosby didn't have status or a reputation before this is astounding. As in, astoundingly ignorant. He was highly revered, had huge sets of fans and many comedians loved him. His legacy was incredible.
Bill Burr for example, before all this shit, has a segment where he talks about how awesome it was to meet Bill Cosby. Dude was in awe. "Like meeting the pope, but way more entertaining". "Richard Prior live in concert and Bill Cosby, run the full gammut, two perfect games (of comedy)". "I can't believe I was talking to Bill Cosby".
Bill Burr - Meeting Bill Cosby - YouTube
I have no idea what you mean by a quagmire. I think it is pretty clear what he is, a person that would drug women and rape them as they were unconscious. Sucks man, I loved the guy before all this. If a bunch of previous women that worked for him had come forward and defended him. If women had said he was really nice to them, etc. If if if, none of it happened. Instead, more and more women that met him in the past lay out the same scenario.
I didn't think about syndication. I'm not aware of any of his shows that were on when this broke, and I certainly don't know if any are still on the air. If they did get pulled, I expect a slight bump in sales of the DVDs.Bro his shows were on like 4 different cable networks and his comedy played all over the place. The dude is too toxic for cable networks to play reruns of his shows, some of the most iconic tv ever made. He was in the middle of a comedy tour when this thing broke out. Maybe you're right, maybe nobody cares and the media is driving the whole thing. I doubt that.
You are wrong. As the Bill Burr example attests, he had plenty of stuff going on and was popular. Now no one, including Bill Burr, wants anything to do with him. His legacy is absolutely getting killed and acting like "no one knows" those other comedians is amazingly ignorant. Bill Cosby on the other hand, yeah, you are an idiot if you think this won't affect his legacy. Every story about him from now on is going to, at the very minimum, have a huge portion of it taken up by this. Yes, plenty of people don't know about great comedians from the past. To say they don't have legacies though, is dumb as shit. Cosby managed to shit all over his.I'm acting exactly the opposite and saying in the long run it will be completely unaffected. The only thing different is that he's not getting coverage when he talks about social issues right now. Bill burr was still in awe when he met cosby, nothing has changed that. I guess it proves my point that you apparently didn't recognize those other comedians I listed. Here's a hint, they were some of the greatest comedians of the 50's and 60's. I used them because the coz was in his prime in the 70's and 80's.
This is what I didn't know you were talking about. I guess this was an attempt to be funny or something.I'm not sure if you realized I was talking about Glen Quagmire (giggity giggity), not boggy swamplands.
Yes, total ignorance on your part about anything going on with the Cosby properties, yet you confidently said that his legacy wouldn't be affected. Then when your ignorance is shown, you double down. How like you.[
I didn't think about syndication. I'm not aware of any of his shows that were on when this broke, and I certainly don't know if any are still on the air. If they did get pulled, I expect a slight bump in sales of the DVDs.
I think the type of people who will suddenly find him not funny because he's been accused of rape are probably the types of people who didn't think he was funny to begin with.
What it does prove is that Cosby lied when he said all those women that accused him were full of shit when they said he gave them drugs in any sense. So it makes their stories much more legitimate now since we don't know what else Cosby was lying about.Exchanging sex for ludes does not mean you were raped. Cosby was denying being involved in the ludes fad of the late 70s. If he had instead been big into the coke craze of the 80s and been giving women coke for sex, that wouldn't be evidence of him being a rapist either.
Now THIS is jumping to conclusions. Is there a single shred of evidence any of these women are lying? Anything at all?... but I still have my doubts that most of those women who are accusing him were actually raped and are just jumping on the bandwagon because they are embarrassed about the fact that they used to be whores, or because they can sniff fame or money.
No, but thats not how this works. We don't have to prove they are lying. They have to prove they are telling the truth.Now THIS is jumping to conclusions. Is there a single shred of evidence any of these women are lying? Anything at all?
That's exactly how this works. You can't claim to be unable to come to a conclusion based on lack of evidence only when it suits you.No, but thats not how this works. We don't have to prove they are lying. They have to prove they are telling the truth.
Which they haven't done.
Actually part of one of the victims story has already been proven by Cosbys on words under oath.They have to prove they are telling the truth.
Which they haven't done.
I wouldn't accuse them of making false rape accusations without proof of such. I would say there's no evidence of their rape accusations.That's exactly how this works. You can't claim to be unable to come to a conclusion based on lack of evidence only when it suits you.
It's perfectly reasonable to say "We don't know" or "We can't say with certainty" when we don't have conclusive evidence. But to then accuse people of making false rape accusations with ZERO evidence supporting that claim is super-hypocritical.
i defend people who i think are being treated unfairly, these people are famous so thats why we have threads talking about them. i am against social justice lynch mobs who dont have all the facts. guilt by suspicion is bad, hmmkay?Was reading through the last few pages of this thread and got a feeling of deja vu. Then I dug up the old Lance Armstrong thread and of course there was Chuk defending the cheater. What is up with you and shady celebrities?
Were you in Sharpton and Jackson's corner during the Duke Lacrosse scandal also?That's exactly how this works. You can't claim to be unable to come to a conclusion based on lack of evidence only when it suits you.
It's perfectly reasonable to say "We don't know" or "We can't say with certainty" when we don't have conclusive evidence. But to then accuse people of making false rape accusations with ZERO evidence supporting that claim is super-hypocritical.