Regime
LOADING, PLEASE WAIT...
- 17,339
- 41,636
LOLI don't even know, that's going to be a tough call.
....but prob Sam 'da Man
Fallout 4
- Thread starter Regime
- Start date
- 17,781
- 25,897
Tuco
I got Tuco'd!
- 49,501
- 88,254
My thought scrolling down that, "Haha I love when they bring out all the crazy and sad personalities this forum has ha..... damn."
My dude will probably be like every other dude I make. Roughly shaved head with a big beard. I enjoyed character generators the first 5 times I used them, but they're a chore now.
My dude will probably be like every other dude I make. Roughly shaved head with a big beard. I enjoyed character generators the first 5 times I used them, but they're a chore now.
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
earthfell
Lord Nagafen Raider
- 730
- 145
What's the story about for FO4? I never played much of any of the fallout games, and got an hour or so into 3 before quitting. There was so much to do that I felt paralyzed and never finished. Are you like in a different part of the country? is this more in the future from FO3? What's the difference?
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
Its post Fallout 3. Instead of Washington DC area, its set in Boston. If you froze up after an hour in Fallout 3 with too much to do, you're not going to do any better in Fallout 4. Its bigger with more shit to do.
Tuco
I got Tuco'd!
- 49,501
- 88,254
I know people who also say the same thing about not wanting to play because there's too many directions you can go. For me that's the #1 thing I like about Bethesda games.
I kind of wish they had less level scaling and some obvious way to tell the player what the level ranges are because that adds more meaning to play choice and players could choose to sneak around conservatively in a high level area to maybe get their hands on a high level weapon. But it's okay that Bethesda games don't go that route. Though, Fallout 3 had more of that than than Elder Scrolls.
I kind of wish they had less level scaling and some obvious way to tell the player what the level ranges are because that adds more meaning to play choice and players could choose to sneak around conservatively in a high level area to maybe get their hands on a high level weapon. But it's okay that Bethesda games don't go that route. Though, Fallout 3 had more of that than than Elder Scrolls.
Running around conning tings with an unstable invisibility spell, without maps, wanting to reach that blue mob in the end of the cave for the loots, risking dying leaving corpse, exp and items behind which you would need help to get.
Old EQ best EQ. Games need to take note.
Souls games did in terms of no maps, rewarding exploration but with danger and an exp penalty and bringing back risk vs reward, and in turn ended up being the best series in gaming at the moment by a rather substantial margin.
I wouldn't mind at all a Fallout with a world that didn't constantly scale to your power level.