Is Aegon being filler a shut topic? Because it seems to me like he's making quite the mark in Westeros...To be fair its easy to forget a lot of the side shit in the books, especially in AFFC and ADWD. Some of the storylines were complete filler like the whole Aegon thing.
lol!Stannis is gunna rez up as a WW, claim to be the rightful heir to the Night Throne and lead an army of WW rebels against the Night King
Aurane was just another piece on Cersei's stack of failures. I didn't think too much of it. The show is doing a pretty good job at showing the audience how much of a fuckup Cersei is even without using all the additional pieces from the books. Or if you meant Aurane being a dumb character, meh.And Aurane Waters. What the fuck was that shit?
Yeah I never thought this was a filler?Is Aegon being filler a shut topic? Because it seems to me like he's making quite the mark in Westeros...
Given that he completely does not exist in the show, and the Golden Company really hasn't been mentioned at all? I guess they could introduce him at this point but it seems to be that he got hit with the plot line consolidation axe. Introducing more splinter bullshit at this point with 2 seasons to go and all the characters in far-flung places in the world seems crazy.Yeah I never thought this was a filler?
I understand cutting him from the show and I guess the implication of well if he's not in the show he must not truly matter in the end.Given that he completely does not exist in the show, and the Golden Company really hasn't been mentioned at all? I guess they could introduce him at this point but it seems to be that he got hit with the plot line consolidation axe. Introducing more splinter bullshit at this point with 2 seasons to go and all the characters in far-flung places in the world seems crazy.
We don't want it to be like a Rome hurry-up-and-finish warp speed consolidation either...
you mean you still clicked on those links which contradict each other and i said they were clickbait?Thanks for linking them dude.
Minor character =/= filler. I feel like you're conflating the two.It was pretty obvious he was filler. A major gamechanging character introduced in book 5, that would invalidate many characters that have been around since the very beginning? Come on.
I don't think you understand sarcasm.you mean you still clicked on those links which contradict each other and i said they were clickbait?
Its harder to detect with text. ��I don't think you understand sarcasm.
I think in this case it might be a distinction without a difference. Books 4 and 5 were padded to ridiculous levels. I think Aegon was to give all these characters some motivation, to pass the time. I don't think any of it was necessary, which is why I call it filler but I guess you can call it a minor character if you want.Minor character =/= filler. I feel like you're conflating the two.