Ignatius
#thePewPewLife
- 4,802
- 6,464
Exactly.Since when do criminals follow laws?
HOW DO YOU LIKE IT?
Exactly.Since when do criminals follow laws?
HOW DO YOU LIKE IT?
I'm actually pretty concerned about this, but I don't know what an easy solution is.Apparently we are completely fucked when 3D printers are like microwaves in every home.
http://blog.ryjones.org/2009/03/31/w...with-the-goal/They aren't constructing guns in the US that can be converted this easily. You don't know what you are talking about.
Why not ban 3D printers?I'm actually pretty concerned about this, but I don't know what an easy solution is.
Exactly exactly. Gun advocates like to pretend that the law is no deterrent when it serves them (criminals don't follow gun bans), but pretend it is an absolute deterrent when it doesn't (modifying guns illegally to fire full auto).Exactly.
I think some restrictions on what they're able to produce is pretty sensible. Guns are an easy target, but there are probably some other things that they shouldn't be able to produce in relatively unlimited quantity on demand.Why not ban 3D printers?
Again, you don't know what you are talking about. It takes more than just drilling anything. It is like those idiots that show videos online about how to convert ar-15s to full auto, etc. The shit they are doing is essentially making the gun slamfire over and over again, which is very dangerous.
I think the point is the criminal will either A) obtain a weapon illegally or B) modify a weapon illegally, if they need to. How the hell does your sentence even make sense in your head?Exactly exactly. Gun advocates like to pretend that the law is no deterrent when it serves them (criminals don't follow gun bans), but pretend it is an absolute deterrent when it doesn't (modifying guns illegally to fire full auto).
That is the maddening thing about arguing with Duppin about this. He hasn't justified a single restriction at all.there is no point to modifying full auto, its less affective than semi-auto
how many shootings have been committed with full auto?
Your assertion was that we didn't need to worry if weapons could be modified to fire full auto, because it's against the law.I think the point is the criminal will either A) obtain a weapon illegally or B) modify a weapon illegally, if they need to. How the hell does your sentence even make sense in your head?
Like vests with pockets?I think some restrictions on what they're able to produce is pretty sensible. Guns are an easy target, but there are probably some other things that they shouldn't be able to produce in relatively unlimited quantity on demand.
When the gun blows up in their hand, they will probably care.How much does someone who would do that care about safety?
On the contrary, you keep trying to push me there but I won't go.You're so far into the land of the absurd.
Yeah, you're the guy that thinks that the flawed language in the NFA enabling trusts was intentional. You're not so good at braining.That is the maddening thing about arguing with Duppin about this. He hasn't justified a single restriction at all.
Again, burden is on YOU to justify additional restrictions. The NFA leaves a papertrail, is expensive and has never been used in a crime. Yet this is something else on your wishlist. It is like you are deliberately trying to prove to everyone that you don't know what you are talking about. Are you always this stupid? Or do guns just bring out the worst in you?Yeah, you're the guy that thinks that the flawed language in the NFA enabling trusts was intentional. You're not so good at braining.
Actually, the burden is on you to actually come out and say whether you think that the authors of the NFA meant for NFA trusts to be possible, rather than continuing to hide behind "lawl it's never been used in a crime", which I never even asserted to the contrary.Again, burden is on YOU to justify additional restrictions. The NFA leaves a papertrail, is expensive and has never been used in a crime. Yet this is something else on your wishlist. It is like you are deliberately trying to prove to everyone that you don't know what you are talking about. Are you always this stupid? Or do guns just bring out the worst in you?