Gun control

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
81,659
163,317
there is no point to modifying full auto, its less affective than semi-auto

how many shootings have been committed with full auto?
 

Palum

what Suineg set it to
27,540
43,873
Exactly exactly. Gun advocates like to pretend that the law is no deterrent when it serves them (criminals don't follow gun bans), but pretend it is an absolute deterrent when it doesn't (modifying guns illegally to fire full auto).
I think the point is the criminal will either A) obtain a weapon illegally or B) modify a weapon illegally, if they need to. How the hell does your sentence even make sense in your head?
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
there is no point to modifying full auto, its less affective than semi-auto

how many shootings have been committed with full auto?
That is the maddening thing about arguing with Duppin about this. He hasn't justified a single restriction at all.
 

Duppin_sl

shitlord
3,785
3
I think the point is the criminal will either A) obtain a weapon illegally or B) modify a weapon illegally, if they need to. How the hell does your sentence even make sense in your head?
Your assertion was that we didn't need to worry if weapons could be modified to fire full auto, because it's against the law.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
81,659
163,317
I think some restrictions on what they're able to produce is pretty sensible. Guns are an easy target, but there are probably some other things that they shouldn't be able to produce in relatively unlimited quantity on demand.
Like vests with pockets?

You're so far into the land of the absurd. I know you realize it too, but its too late to reverse course. At this point i guess all you got is to double down on the idiocy.


What about Load Bearing Pants, Duppin? And I dont mean the kind you wear where you shit yourself at the sight of someone holding a gun.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
81,659
163,317
No one had to push you, we're all feeling sorry enough for you as is and trying to throw you a lifeline.

Its ok, we will forget about the whole "lets ban vests with pockets" thing. Just come back to the land of sanity.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Yeah, you're the guy that thinks that the flawed language in the NFA enabling trusts was intentional. You're not so good at braining.
Again, burden is on YOU to justify additional restrictions. The NFA leaves a papertrail, is expensive and has never been used in a crime. Yet this is something else on your wishlist. It is like you are deliberately trying to prove to everyone that you don't know what you are talking about. Are you always this stupid? Or do guns just bring out the worst in you?
 

Duppin_sl

shitlord
3,785
3
Again, burden is on YOU to justify additional restrictions. The NFA leaves a papertrail, is expensive and has never been used in a crime. Yet this is something else on your wishlist. It is like you are deliberately trying to prove to everyone that you don't know what you are talking about. Are you always this stupid? Or do guns just bring out the worst in you?
Actually, the burden is on you to actually come out and say whether you think that the authors of the NFA meant for NFA trusts to be possible, rather than continuing to hide behind "lawl it's never been used in a crime", which I never even asserted to the contrary.

When some guy with an NFA trust stockpile flips out and goes on a killing spree, it's going to be absolutely epic, though.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
81,659
163,317
People like Duppin really make me ashamed to be a liberal sometimes.

Totally clueless and uninformed.