In this is why it's pointless to argue with you idiots. If you can't realize the difference between providing services for 30 million and 300 million then what's the point?why wouldnt healthcare work when scaled up from 30 million people to 300 million?
Healthcare was better before Obamacare. Currently looks like there will be more uninsured Jan 1, 2014 than before.Please show us where this hyper-capitalistic utopian society that you conservatives espouse actually exists. A land free of governmental regulation and social safety nets.
Are you arguing that health care before Obummercare was passed was working out great and in the best interests of our country? Please tell us how you keep premiums affordable when 50 million people go uninsured and pass their healthcare costs onto the ER's which are then passed on to paying consumers.
You're arguing with every point I've made against Obamacare. That's termed "defending it" you total fuckwad.You are a retard, I haven't been defending Obamacare. I think it's a pile of shit. I also think the previous system was a pile of shit. But keep slaying those imaginary dragons in your head.
The shortfall in the number of physicians will affect everyone, but the impact will be most severe on
vulnerable and underserved populations. These groups include the approximately 20 percent of Americans who
live in rural or inner-city locations designated as health professional shortage areas.
Jesus Christ you guys are psychopaths. You guys are pissed because MORE people will have insurance? You will only be happy as long as you are comforted in the fact that 32 million Americans remain uninsured? Is that the point of linking the article? Because what you linked makes no mention of a doctor shortage because they aren't getting paid enough, but because baby boomers are getting old and the previously uninsured will now have coverage.well the american association of medical doctors says there is going to be a shortage. they list adding 30 million new people into the system as part of the main reason (+ baby boomers retiring )
https://www.aamc.org/download/286592/data/
he Census Bureau projects a 36 percent growth in the number of Americans over age 65, the very segment of
the population with the greatest health care needs.
In fact, your article actually argues for MORE assistance from the Federal Government in shoring up our health care. Do you even fucking read what you link garglechimp?The passage of health care reform, while setting in motion long-overdue efforts to insure an additional 32 million Americans, will increase the need for doctors and exacerbate a physician shortage driven by the rapid expansion of the number of Americans over age 65
Congress must lift the freeze on Medicare-supported residency positions.
Medicare must continue paying for its share of training costs by supporting at least a 15 percent increase in GME positions
Bear in mind the majority of these people are the ones that DON'T WANT IT TO BEGIN WITH, and are having it forced on them.You guys are pissed because MORE people will have insurance?
Examiner Editorial: Obamacare will end up forcing doctors to take patients | WashingtonExaminer.comAn estimated seven out of every 10 physicians in deep-blue California are rebelling against the state's Obamacare health insurance exchange and won't participate, the head of the state's largest medical association said.
~
California's doctor rebellion isn't unique. Pollock previously reported comparable situations at 15 other locations around the country. Not only are thousands of doctors saying no to Obamacare, so are major health insurance providers, including United Healthcare, Aetna and Cigna, as well as some of the nation's most famous hospitals. Among the latter group are Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles, Memorial Sloan-Kettering and NewYork-Presbyterian in New York, and the Physicians Regional Hospital in Naples, Florida, which was formerly associated with the Cleveland Clinic.
These developments herald an approaching crisis for Obamacare that will dwarf the present confusion and political damage caused by disastrous launch of healthcare.gov. The coming crisis will force the hands of President Obama and the program's main congressional advocates, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. If just half - to say nothing of 70 percent - of America's doctors refuse to treat Obamacare patients, Obama, Reid and Pelosi will have to decide whether to throw in the towel or to ramrod through Congress legislation to force doctors to do their bidding.
Just as cars can't go anywhere without drivers and employees can't work without bosses, health care doesn't happen when there are no doctors around. And when an estimated 70 percent of the doctors in the nation's deepest-blue state are rebelling against Obamacare, the Affordable Care Act is forcing a critical decision: America will have to junk Obamacare and go back to square one on health insurance reform, or trash the last vestige of private health care in this country by forcing doctors to do the government's bidding.
WALLACE: Wait. No. He asked a question. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Did he not say that, sir?
EMANUEL: He didn't say you could have unlimited choice.
WALLACE: It's a simple yes or no question. Didn't he say if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor?
EMANUEL: Yes. But look, if you want to pay more for an insurance company that covers your doctor, you can do that. This is a matter of choice. We know in all sorts of places you pay more for certain -- for a wider range of choices or wider range of benefits. The issue isn't the selective networks. People keep saying, 'Oh, the problem is you're going to have a selective network.'
WALLACE: Well, if you lose your doctor or lose your hospital --
EMANUEL: Let me just say something.People are going to have a choice as to whether they want to pay a certain amount for a selective network or pay more for a broader network.
WALLACE: Which means your premiums will probably go up.
EMANUEL: They get that choice. That's a choice you've always made.
WALLACE: Which means your premium may go up over what you were paying so that, in other words --
EMANUEL: No one guaranteed you that your premium wouldn't increase. Premiums have been going up.
If a man doesn't want insurance, and then he goes in for treatment, who pays for his care?Bear in mind the majority of these people are the ones that DON'T WANT IT TO BEGIN WITH, and are having it forced on them.
You realize the way you align your positions you're actually arguing it's better to hurt large groups of minorities so pampered white kids who where never for the most part in danger can pay for their elderly parents who have nothing better to do than watch politics and vote?