Frenzied Wombat
Potato del Grande
Dude it's common sense that applies to every industry.. People pay more for a higher skillset if they can afford it. Would you pay 3K a year to an internist fresh out of med school when you can pay that amount to a doctor with 20+ years experience and wins top 10 doc in your city year after year? It's the same with the "out of network docs". Do you think a doctor fresh out of med school, or a doctor with an average reputation, can afford to "fire" all insurance companies and go out of network for all treatment? What about a plastic surgeon that has a thriving "travel" practice where people fly into LA for surgery with a famous PS, and he has a dedicated "travel nurse" and a deal with a nearby hotel for his patients to stay at? Does your average PS just out of med school have this type of practice, or is it primarily famous plastic surgeons?If you can provide any factual evidence based on statistics, studies etc that concierge doctors are more technically competent than doctors with traditional practices I would be more than willing to change my opinion. Until then you are just making an assumption and using your own stepdad as evidence to back up your point. I can counter your one example with one example of my own. Dr James Andrews is one of, if not the #1, most famous orthopedic surgeon in the world. He built his reputation performing surgeries on superstar professional athletes. His sports medicine practice is in Birmingham, Alabama and his primary clientele are high school athletes from all walks of life with basic insurance.
Lastly, I don't doubt you when you say the Canadian system works. If you are happy with it then more power to you. The US system works too. Back to the original topic of this thread, the issue is does the US system work better now than it did before Obamacare. The evidence so far clearly indicates it does not work better and appears to be getting even worse.
Since the American health care system is capitalistic and profit driven in nature, obviously the same rules of demand/supply apply. Great doctors that are in high demand charge more, and can afford to do away with insurance dependency. The result is that the best quality medicine is reserved for those that can afford it. Your example (unless you can cite stats) is the philanthropic exception to the rule. My stepdad does do a few medicare and charity cases per month as well, but they are the exception not the rule..
As for whether Obamacare is good or not, I honestly don't know for sure. It hasn't effected me all that much, but it did cause my internist to enact his concierge service because he couldn't make as much as he used to, so imho that's a negative. On the whole, my opinion is that you can't marry socialist principles bolted onto a capitalist system. There are some fantastic rules like the elimination of pre-existing conditions as a barrier to getting insurance, but my opinion of Obamacare as a sum of its policies is so far negative. I can tell you my stepdad despises it, but that's because it generates less money for doctors, so his opinion is biased based on his pocketbook.