So I went to get my yearly physical today with a new doctor since I'm moving two towns over next month and wanted a new doc close by. When it comes to the diet portion she mentions that her digital records show that previously I had borderline high cholesterol and asks about my diet. I explain that I've pretty much always been right near that 200 total cholesterol mark and that diet really never had an effect, but that I had been alternating low carb and keto for the last three years after following the general consensus low fat, heart healthy diet for most of the rest of my adult life. She proceeds to tell me that I should watch out for that because most low carb and keto diets rely too much on animal fat and protein and those things are PROVEN to raise cholesterol levels. Instead of getting into the weeds with her about how much research I've done on these subjects and how diet science hasn't proven that at all, I decide to take a different route and say "Thanks, I'll take that into consideration. On that subject, all my research shows that total cholesterol may not show the whole picture for health so I was wondering if you could order the test for measuring my LDL particles to see if they are the fluffy good kind or the dense bad kind." Her answer was "Yes, I can do that, but no current medical guidelines take into account particle size in their diagnosis or prescription. We only look at total cholesterol."
It is my firm belief that GPs should be researching and recommending solutions to the most common issues we face these days, and diet and exercise should be at the top of that list. I really wish I could find a GP that gave enough of a fuck to stay current on those subjects. I was really tempted to ask her if she thought I should just follow the food pyramid for optimal health, but didn't want to blatantly antagonize her.
CHOLESTEROL | 223 mg/dL | <200 mg/dL |
TRIGLYCERIDE | 45 mg/dL | <150 mg/dL |
HDL | 62 mg/dL | 40 - 59 mg/dL |
LDL CALCULATED | 152 mg/dL | <100 mg/dL |
NON-HDL CHOLESTEROL | 161 mg/dL | <130 mg/dL |
According to that chart it is high. Not saying the "guidelines" are gospel or anything but you are over the "desired maximum" on everything except triglyceride.
So I went to get my yearly physical today with a new doctor since I'm moving two towns over next month and wanted a new doc close by. When it comes to the diet portion she mentions that her digital records show that previously I had borderline high cholesterol and asks about my diet. I explain that I've pretty much always been right near that 200 total cholesterol mark and that diet really never had an effect, but that I had been alternating low carb and keto for the last three years after following the general consensus low fat, heart healthy diet for most of the rest of my adult life. She proceeds to tell me that I should watch out for that because most low carb and keto diets rely too much on animal fat and protein and those things are PROVEN to raise cholesterol levels. Instead of getting into the weeds with her about how much research I've done on these subjects and how diet science hasn't proven that at all, I decide to take a different route and say "Thanks, I'll take that into consideration. On that subject, all my research shows that total cholesterol may not show the whole picture for health so I was wondering if you could order the test for measuring my LDL particles to see if they are the fluffy good kind or the dense bad kind." Her answer was "Yes, I can do that, but no current medical guidelines take into account particle size in their diagnosis or prescription. We only look at total cholesterol."
It is my firm belief that GPs should be researching and recommending solutions to the most common issues we face these days, and diet and exercise should be at the top of that list. I really wish I could find a GP that gave enough of a fuck to stay current on those subjects. I was really tempted to ask her if she thought I should just follow the food pyramid for optimal health, but didn't want to blatantly antagonize her.
I get that, and it is why I've done so much research on these things.
I'm with you that "fat makes you fat" is bunk science. And generally speaking "nutritional science" is bunk for the most part anyway. You can find studies to support any theory on healthy eating you have. I've done keto diets on and off my entire adult life with great success and never had test results come back as anything other than in the "healthy" range.
But basing your belief entirely on the ratio doesn't seem like good practice. You could have ldl at 1000 mg/dL and hdl at 500 mg/dL and still be at a ratio of 2:1 but your cholesterol would be off the fucking charts.
There is more than you could ever want to read from both sides of the argument.
EDIT: By the way if you're thinking about trying it you would need to talk to a specialist first. Diabetics are at risk of going into Ketoacidosis which could kill you. So you probably want to steer clear of low carb diets.
generally speaking "nutritional science" is bunk for the most part anyway
No, not thinking about trying it. I have a pretty strict diet (BUT THE B URGER KING CALLS ME SO OFTEN) and just keep my numbers in check. I've considered a keto diet but being low sugar feels fucking awful.There is more than you could ever want to read from both sides of the argument.
EDIT: By the way if you're thinking about trying it you would need to talk to a specialist first. Diabetics are at risk of going into Ketoacidosis which could kill you. So you probably want to steer clear of low carb diets.