It has nothing to do with bots I am sure, the revisions were less than 1% of users, bots make up way more than that I am sure. Probably just some broken flag on the website or app that was telling them more people looked at it than really did.That seems pretty shitty, i guess ignorance is actually a defense, considering if they had disclosed real users (I'm guessing they were counting the bots) they would have never been anywhere close to this valuation like Netflix.
Now if they are actually spending money on bot farms and have been, that might actually be indefensible.
- 1