TomServo
<Bronze Donator>
- 6,954
- 9,833
Got mine yesterday. Mad gayGot a RSU stonk disbursement last month. 22% tax on that bullshit.
- 2
- 1
Got mine yesterday. Mad gayGot a RSU stonk disbursement last month. 22% tax on that bullshit.
Just to add, when I was still working, usually we'd see lead engineer types on a DoD project making about $150/hr fully burdened.
So the UAW is asking for the average autoworker to be making what an engineer with 20+ years of experience on a fighter jet is making.
I can only assume the UAW situation has prompted this Tesla upgrade from Morgan Stanley. If those labor costs are passed on through higher prices, you're going to send customers elsewhere.Jesus fucking Christ. The hourly numbers here are accurate?
(US) Wells Fargo analysts estimate that if all UAW demands passed, the average hourly labor costs for Big Three US automakers would more than double from ~$66/h to ~$136/h
What I read is the upgrade is due to Tesla's supercomputer called DOJO.I can only assume the UAW situation has prompted this Tesla upgrade from Morgan Stanley. If those labor costs are passed on through higher prices, you're going to send customers elsewhere.
09/10 19:47 TSLA Morgan Stanley Raised TSLA to Overweight from Equal-Weight, price target $400 from $250
Oh yes of course... AI to the rescue .. one supercomputer that's going to make half a trillion in market value.
No because they actually built and sold components for these supercomputers, which means that actual transactions and good old fashioned revenue has actually occurred. The "exponential value" of them running is something that is only speculative.It worked for Nvidia
No because they actually built and sold components for these supercomputers, which means that actual transactions and good old fashioned revenue has actually occurred. The "exponential value" of them running is something that is only speculative.
Sure but in one case you have a product that already exists that people are buying, in the other you have theoretical product development that might create products to sell.So they generated enough revenue to justify their 350% stock run in the last year? So yes, they also benefited from AI supercomputer hype
Fundamentals don't matter. Facts don't matter. The world runs on hopium, hypium, and feels. These are countered by animal spirits. Bears, sharks, and wolves lurk around every corner.Sure but in one case you have a product that already exists that people are buying, in the other you have theoretical product development that might create products to sell.
I guess the difference between the guy selling the beanie babies and the woman "investing" in them. They both take a hit when it goes under but one has spent years milking the market for cash and the other has been burning it.
Buy the truck; dont buy the stock?
How much tsla does morgan own?Oh yes of course... AI to the rescue .. one supercomputer that's going to make half a trillion in market value.