What made him a suspicious person again?2). He was following a suspicious person which is a very good reason.
What made him a suspicious person again?2). He was following a suspicious person which is a very good reason.
if trayvon walked home instead of confronting and assualting zimmerman nobody would have been shot either, causality isn't a one way street.Im not following the trial but if Zimmerman would have stayed in the car, nobody would have been shot.
Anything he wants? There's no criteria for thinking someone is suspicious. There's no litmus test. No rights are violated by following someone you think is suspicious, for ANY reason.What made him a suspicious person again?
Please, make it stop. Shit, someone even posted PICTURES, that show Martin was basically at home already and decided to go back and beat the shit out of Zimmerman. There was no "following," and even if there was, when is following someone a crime?Thats such bullshit. He wasnt defending anyone. He had no good reason for following him.
He had no good reason for following him.
He had no good reason for following him.
He had no good reason for following him.
The best weapon he could find in his home for assaulting someone was a concrete slab? Ok, sounds legit.Please, make it stop. Shit, someone even posted PICTURES, that show Martin was basically at home already and decided to go back and beat the shit out of Zimmerman. There was no "following," and even if there was, when is following someone a crime?
.....Thats such bullshit. He wasnt defending anyone. He had no good reason for following him. He reported it, he called the police. Cool, wait. Was he trained to subdue people or in the use of deadly force? No, then what the fuck was he doing? He made stupid choices which created the situation. He had a choice. He wasnt cornered, nobody was in danger, until he created the situation, which he resolved with deadly force.
Some of you CHOOSE to believe the defenses version. The jury didnt have enough evidence to disprove it. Thats fine. I dont. I think he should have acted more responsibly. I never would have gotten out of the car when the dispatcher told me not to. Neither would most of you. Again, not criminal, but still reckless.
And no, it probably COULDNT have happened to you, unless you decide to pretend you are a cop and follow people around at night. Martin didnt go looking for Zimmerman.
Troll confirmed. Time for a vacation.The best weapon he could find in his home for assaulting someone was a concrete slab? Ok, sounds legit.
Because there's no law against having poor judgment?Maybe someone can explain why GZ wasn't using poor judgement in what he did. And if you can't maybe you can then explain to me why poor judgement doesnt equate to liability. And you can't do that, maybe you explain to me why a law that prevents that where a persons life is lost isnt a shitty law..
and we are back to my original point.
Are you trying to argue that he wasn't essentially almost home? Even the prosecution didn't disagree with that. Rachel Jeantel was theprosecution'switness, slick.The best weapon he could find in his home for assaulting someone was a concrete slab? Ok, sounds legit.
His neighborhood was involved in a number of break-in's committed by young AA youths. Here was a young AA youth that he didn't know.What made him a suspicious person again?
The Justice Department has responded to appeals to probe whether George Zimmerman committed any civil rights violations in the fatal shooting of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin -- but previously filed FBI documents are already challenging the narrative that the shooting was racially motivated.What made him a suspicious person again?
Horselaugh fallacy isn't an argument.Sticks and concrete slabs, counselor.
It makes sense to me now.
Narrative of the Mind of Trayvonn Martin
"Verily, I have just narrowly escaped from the creepy cracker that was following me! Huzzah! But he was following me why? Was it because im Erudian? That villain! I cannot let this slight pass, besides I must tell my illiterate fat maiden tomorrow at school that I stomped his ass and I aints no bitch. I shall leave my home and confront this scoundrel! But what weapons should I bring? Bat? No. Knife? No. Hockey Stick? If only I played hockey! No.. I shall bring only my trusty skittles and iced tea to this epic encounter!"
Later..
"Here he comes, but my god he is far shorter than I and fat, I fear my candy and sugary beverage are not up to the task.. luckily I have plenty of time to search for a good weapon to use as I lie wait.. stick? no.... I know, this huge concrete slab is perfect! Now I attack!
LEEEEEEEEEEERRRROOOOOY"
I must've missed that part of the trial where Zimmerman attempted to subdue Trayvon and then employed deadly force. Oh that's right, he didn't. The only deadly force came when it was forced by Trayvon's immature hand.Thats such bullshit. He wasnt defending anyone. He had no good reason for following him. He reported it, he called the police. Cool, wait. Was he trained to subdue people or in the use of deadly force? No, then what the fuck was he doing? He made stupid choices which created the situation. He had a choice. He wasnt cornered, nobody was in danger, until he created the situation, which he resolved with deadly force.
Some of you CHOOSE to believe the defenses version. The jury didnt have enough evidence to disprove it. Thats fine. I dont. I think he should have acted more responsibly. I never would have gotten out of the car when the dispatcher told me not to. Neither would most of you. Again, not criminal, but still reckless.
And no, it probably COULDNT have happened to you, unless you decide to pretend you are a cop and follow people around at night. Martin didnt go looking for Zimmerman.
Are "at home" and "almost at home" the same thing?Are you trying to argue that he wasn't essentially almost home? Even the prosecution didn't disagree with that. Rachel Jeantel was theprosecution'switness, slick.