You are a profound disappointment to me.I so wanted to high5 her or cheer her on but I didn't.
A smart thing. She would have thought you were a gay rapistSo while I was at a restaurant earlier today, a father and his teenage daughter were arguing about the Zimmerman case. The daughter (who was maybe 12 or so) kept pointing to all the facts in the case, just like we did in this thread. The dad just kept getting more and more upset, almost shouting "HE STALKED HIM" blah blah. Finally he told his daughter to shut up and eat her food. Was awesome listening to this little girl school her crazy father with facts.
I so wanted to high5 her or cheer her on but I didn't.
Not sure I understand what you mean by this, that the burden falls on Martin to prove he's not suspicious or Zimmerman to prove he is?Well, first and foremost, you have an absolute right to call police about a suspicious looking person. That's a burden shifting onto the person trying to...do the right thing.
You can't control someone calling the police on you for looking suspicious, you have no knowledge that they're even doing it, unless they explicitly tell you.Not sure I understand what you mean by this, that the burden falls on Martin to prove he's not suspicious or Zimmerman to prove he is?
So, why get out and follow him? If he's suspicious enough to warrant calling the police, why get out of your safe vehicle to follow him?Secondly, Zimmerman didn't choose to confront Martin. That never happened. That's a misstatement of the facts of the case. Zimmerman got out after Martin ran around the townhomes and down the dog path. Zimmerman traveled about 30 yards MAYBE to the end of the dog path so he could continue to report to the police the location of the suspicious person.
I'm not trying to 'shift the burden'. if Zimmerman had not called the police, nothing would have happened that night. If Zimmerman had only called the police and not followed Martin, nothing would have happened because Martin would have arrived home before they got there. Zimmerman made choices that he is responsible for. They do not negate the fact that he was legally able to defend himself, but he is culpable for the decisions he made.Effectively, any argument for Zimmerman's guilt must rely on burden shifting just like this. That's why no argument for that side makes sense. Nothing Zimmerman was doing was attempting to create a confrontation. He did not seek to confront Martin. He simply attempted to report his location to police as he (Martin) ran. Martin RETURNED and attacked Zimmerman. MARTIN was the one who sought an actual, physical confrontation to the situation.
To continue reporting to the police his location. He ran around the buildings. Zimmerman said he was asked for an address and got out to get the address.So, why get out and follow him? If he's suspicious enough to warrant calling the police, why get out of your safe vehicle to follow him?
You may not be trying to, but you are, by claiming that someone who did the correct thing (calling the police on someone they believed to be suspicious in a neighborhood with many recent breakins) was creating an unsafe situation by calling the police. Normally, when someone calls the police on someone they think looks suspicious, this is a good thing. Yet magically in this case, its a sign that Zimmerman was irresponsible and seeking to create a confrontation with Martin.I'm not trying to 'shift the burden'. if Zimmerman had not called the police, nothing would have happened that night. If Zimmerman had only called the police and not followed Martin, nothing would have happened because Martin would have arrived home before they got there. Zimmerman made choices that he is responsible for. They do not negate the fact that he was legally able to defend himself, but he is culpable for the decisions he made.
No he's legitimately already said he's playing Devil's advocate. I'm just talking him through the errors in the argument. Its cool man. He's cool. I dunno how much he believes what he's arguing, but implicitly he quoted someone else asking for a Devil's advocate attempt at making the Martin argument and he's giving it. Its not the same as the uninformed people coming in and just spewing trash to spew trash.Hodj, I think people are just fucking with you now. What is this, attempt 20 with te same argument? Just post the damn timeline
You're talking to a man who has willingly argued logic with Lumie for page after page after page.Lumie.Hodj, I think people are just fucking with you now. What is this, attempt 20 with te same argument? Just post the damn timeline
Dude I've read Lumie's shit since like 2004, I couldn't pass up the chance. I don't get how people don't get that.You're talking to a man who has willingly argued logic with Lumie for page after page after page.Lumie.
"We will be filing a whistleblower action in (Florida's Fourth Judicial District) Circuit Court," said Kruidbos' attorney Wesley White, himself a former prosecutor who was hired by Corey but resigned in December because he disagreed with her prosecutorial priorities. He said the suit will be filed within the next 30 days.
Yeah, see, most of us would not want to touch him. This explains a lot about you...I think?Its like getting to touch Elvis in those final days right before he died when he was all fat and sweaty and blocked up from eating too many pills.
Dude, I would have never washed my hand again.Yeah, see, most of us would not want to touch him.
Not trying to fuck with him at all. Someone asked for a different viewpoint and I'm putting one out there. Iv'e already said i agree he was justified in defending himself. hodj and I differ on the choices made by both people leading up to the shooting.Hodj, I think people are just fucking with you now. What is this, attempt 20 with te same argument? Just post the damn timeline
By differing, you mean that you think that calling the police on someone you think might be suspicious is an aggressive act that is akin to wanting to start a fight. This is so out of whack to how most people view such an act that its hard to think you truly believe it and just aren't trying to play devils advocate/troll.hodj and I differ on the choices made
It would surprise you how many people die on the shitter. It's because of the way you shit. You close your larnyx to create internal pressure to push that turd out.Dude I've read Lumie's shit since like 2004, I couldn't pass up the chance. I don't get how people don't get that.
Its like getting to touch Elvis in those final days right before he died when he was all fat and sweaty and blocked up from eating too many pills.
The constipation killed him, you know.
They've proven the toilet is the culprit. Apparently, only the Chinese do it right. You're supposed to align your "tubes" when you squat, but when you sit, its all bent and what not.It would surprise you how many people die on the shitter. It's because of the way you shit. You close your larnyx to create internal pressure to push that turd out.
The turd is just destined to win sometimes.
It truly is a test of wills.The turd is just destined to win sometimes.