Justice for Zimmerman

Tanoomba_sl said:

I'm not "implying" anything, I'm telling you what the evidence shows. Zimmerman's injuries were not severe.

Click to expand...

Wrong, in fact what you're saying now directly contradicts Vincent DiMiao's testimony in the trial. You're also making the case the Prosecution witness Dr Rao made, so don't try to lie again and say you aren't trying to round about say Zimmerman is guilty of murder here

http://news.yahoo.com/expert-bolster...005644637.html

DiMaio testified that Zimmerman, 29,had at least six injuries after his clash with Martin- including two on the back of his head that appeared to indicate impacts with concrete - one on each temple, one on his forehead and one on his nose.

Valerie Rao, a medical examiner who testified last week for the prosecution, said Zimmerman suffered "insignificant" injuries in the incident, as the state attempted to undermine Zimmerman's claim he feared for his life.

DiMaio said the injuries could be worse than they appeared. Lacerations to Zimmerman's head suggested the use of "severe force," he said, lending credence to his claim that Martin slammed Zimmerman's head into a concrete walkway after knocking him to the ground with a punch that broke his nose.

Click to expand...

You are, in fact, implying that Zimmerman should not have used his gun to defend himself, because Martin hadn't severely injured him (According to you) and wasn't going to.

You're a dishonest hack

Tanoomba_sl said:

Of course not. He was entirely justified in the way he acted.

Click to expand...

Wrong. If he wasn't in threat of serious bodily injury or death, his shooting wasn't justified. Hence why you're wrong, and why the court found him not guilty.

it's with people who assume the gun saved him from death/serious injury.

Click to expand...

Right so your position is that 40 year veteran pathologist and leading medical examiner Dr Vincent DiMiao is wrong and you're right.

So time to pony up with that evidence that you have any background of mention whatsoever of relevance to this topic. We're waiting.

Again, he's been here spamming this thread for hours before I got here tonight.

I just came back and saw him completely derailing the thread and decided to do something about it. Mostly because he is trying to attack me by proxy through other people.

I might as well be here to make my arguments for myself if he's going to argue me whether I'm here or not.

Also:

You wrong me, Delita.

That hurts. You're basically my favorite video game character of all time.

Why is it that he's sitting here for hours attacking me, and somehow its my fault, or my responsibility to sit there and take it without response or rebuttal?

I'm pretty sure I ignored him all of the day, until he started rapid fire spamming this shit attacking me. Even then I let it go on for quite awhile before I said anything.

Tanoomba_sl said:

What's the matter with you? I'm not implying that at all. I could not be any clearer.

Click to expand...

Its exactly what you're implying. You're even using the same words. Troll harder.

Wrong. He just had to believe he was in danger of serious bodily injury or death to be justified, which he did.

Click to expand...

Right. He did...because he was.

Dr. DiMeowmeow is fantastic when it comes to talking about whatcould havehappened. He's great at detailing the kind of damage the brainmighttake if ithappens to behit a certain way. I don't disagree with a single word he said. He's not a fortune-teller, though, so his testimony does nothing to prove Zimmerman would have been killed or suffered serious injury if he had not shot Martin.

Click to expand...

So basically, you don't disagree with anything he said, except you do disagree with all of it, he's not a fortune teller, but you are.

Anyway, he has a 40 year medical career, you have a degree in English. You have no authority to discount his testimony, and no capacity to refute it. You are literally done here. Hence why you're running away, till tomorrow, when you'll try to trot out the same stupid argument again to get everyone to go in circles on it again.

Attach a meaning or reason to points lest you risk confusing everyone you ever meet in your entire life.

This article goes to a url not found on the daily beasts main page, work for anyone else?

STEREOTYPES
Yes, Trayvon's Jury Was Irrational

by Amanda Marcott


edit: it's up now

http://www.thedailybeast.com/witw/ar...y-verdict.html

Wow I read that whole thing and it had nothing directly to do with the trial it's just a fluff peace about not thinking woman are emotionally driven. it was driving me nuts cause the link was dead for like 2 hours, and for this? blegh.

Hey naacp and all the activist black people vote against stand your ground: because racism.



0-15:00

case and presidents speach.