Seriously, dude? You're one step behind him.Tuco you gotta do something about this shit. This guy is fucking off his medication or something.
Seriously, dude? You're one step behind him.Tuco you gotta do something about this shit. This guy is fucking off his medication or something.
I like the white lesbian in the back with the "I don't feel safe" sign.
examples of "rampant racism" pleaseso debating the subject of the thread for too long is not ok, meanwhile the rampant racism within goes unchecked? WOW
Seriously, some people have used this whole thread as justification for them to say how much they hate black people.
Am I allowed to make a response without getting another infraction?Seriously, dude? You're one step behind him.
Youhadto respond to Tanoomba about as much as Trayvonhadto assault Zimmerman.I wouldn't havehadto respond.
So Rerolled is Duty to Retreat, not Stand Your Group/Self-Defense =)So basically, what you mods have said is Tanoomba has the right to go into a thread, attack me personally for hours, and if I respond, I'm in the wrong.
Exactly my point. Thank you.So Rerolled is Duty to Retreat, not Stand Your Group/Self-Defense =)
I'm like Attorney Don West's sexy daughter eating ice creamActually, I'd say I'm more akin to Zimmerman in this situation. Being blamed for defending myself.
All the stuff about "we're not racist we're culturist!" was a pretty awful attempt at legitimising racism imo.examples of "rampant racism" please
It's actually kind of similar to religious zealotry where anything that doesn't support their mantra is tuned out. Except, of course, for the fact that religion is bullshit whereas racism still does very much exist.I love how everyone gets all frothy about racism but completely ignores the physical attack.
Assume for a second that GZ actually does hate black people. Like he won't eat with a fork that a black person ever even breathed on. Etc. Which is worse, being a racist or attacking and beating people on the street?
Why has nobody picked up on the irony that GZ thought TM was suspicious... and TM attacked him basically for nothing. Doesn't that make GZ exactly correct that TM was suspicious? Here's a guy who picked a fight for nothing. They're condemning GZ's suspicion when it was EXACTLY RIGHT.
This is the part I have issue with. You don't have to respond to him every single time. Is the part of your brain that can ignore people completely broken? Are you physically compelled to respond to every inane post someone makes that you take issue with? And there's a large gap between defending yourself(which I have no problem with) and making giant responses back and forth ad nausaem. People are reporting both of you guys and this thread alone has garnered so many fucking reported posts I wish we could lock it, set it on fire and push it off a cliff.Maybe if you mods would have done something about that, I wouldn't have had to respond. I gave you plenty of time.
I'm from the UK and until a few days ago when I read the original post I did not know that TM attacked GZ first. Most of the reporting in the UK recently has been about the outrage at the decision rather than the facts themselves. The case gives further fuel to the UK belief that no gun control is stupid and that the stand your ground law is stupid. Another example of the lack of reporting in UK media is that I didn't realise the SYG law wasn't used by the defence until recently...Why has nobody picked up on the irony that GZ thought TM was suspicious... and TM attacked him basically for nothing. Doesn't that make GZ exactly correct that TM was suspicious? Here's a guy who picked a fight for nothing. They're condemning GZ's suspicion when it was EXACTLY RIGHT.