I enjoy them as a good counterpoint to all the people comparing the shit to Emmett Till or wanting to prosecute him with hate crime laws.
Pretty much this. Calling him a hero is meant to irritate the Trayvon people who still don't know any of the facts in the case.
As for the libertarian debate.
There are right libertarians, which is a US phenomena, and there are left libertarians, which is basically a form of communism. Right libertarians believe in limited government intervention, which generally includes being pro choice, pro gay marriage (or, in reality, anti government involvement in marriage all together aka no marriage benefits in taxes, no child care tax credits, no federal recognition of the status of Marriage between any two people, churches are free to marry whom they choose but the marriage ceremony bears no legal weight and all relationships are enshrined under contract law, essentially) limited to no involvement in foreign affairs, to the point of being isolationist at times, they are generally for open borders/immigration, against federal regulation of industries, against federal environmental regulations, etc.
Left libertarians are your neo socialist communes, a good example would be the Spanish leftists/anarcho-syndicalists that were crushed by Francisco Franco. As far as I'm aware they had no money, no formalized governing bodies, a good description of them would be basically communist (little c not big C communists) the movements inspired by people like Mikhail Bakunin (the real Mikhail Bakunin, who was at odds with Marx over all sorts of ideas as to what a communist society should look like) lets see I think people like Dumar like to point to what is it the Czech republic run by Tito as another example of this? I might be wrong there.
Anyway. Libertarian is a strange word because depending which side of the Atlantic you fall on, it means radically different things. Probably why so much confusion.
The interesting thing to note is that, in a way, both libertarians and anarcho syndicalists could probably live and share the same planet and even the same village and get along fine, using simple barter exchange to facilitate trade between the two bodies while the libertarians still utilize money amongst themselves and the anarcho-syndicalists share everything. Both have a policy of "live and let live" that really should be considered the defining feature of libertarianism of either a right or left wing bent, in my opinion.
Sorry Tito was Yugoslavia. Why do I constantly get it and the Czech's mixed up? I dunno. But anyway. Here's a link to his wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josip_Broz_Tito
I'm not certain if Yugoslavia under Tito was anarcho-syndicalist or not, I always just sort of assumed it was since between the Spanish Anarchists and the Yugoslav communists, these are the two groups cited by people who are favorable to Marxist doctrine when asked what Socialist/Communist societies have actually succeeded without falling into totalitarianism and mass slaughter like Cambodia, China, the USSR, etc.