- 25,871
- 50,877
Have you ever personally known any cops? Especially small town cops?Unless the argument is like Cad said and they were just always shitbags.
Have you ever personally known any cops? Especially small town cops?Unless the argument is like Cad said and they were just always shitbags.
I'm not sure comparing metaphorical killing to actual killing is a valid equivalence. Especially when you consider the actual killing was of an innocent third partyI'd argue that might have been the most rational thing the Police did in that entire fucking series.
1) They essentially killed SA once with the rape conviction. Never mind the rapist getting up in them guts with SA in jail.
2) They did it(kill SA) again in 95 when they ignored the tip.
3) Holy fuck, nice investigation guys.
I dunno. I'm just totally unconvinced they're not capable and willing to off TH.
I'm not sure comparing metaphorical killing to actual killing is a valid equivalence. Especially when you consider the actual killing was of an innocent third partyI'd argue that might have been the most rational thing the Police did in that entire fucking series.
1) They essentially killed SA once with the rape conviction. Never mind the rapist getting up in them guts with SA in jail.
2) They did it(kill SA) again in 95 when they ignored the tip.
3) Holy fuck, nice investigation guys.
I dunno. I'm just totally unconvinced they're not capable and willing to off TH.
How do you think SA feels about your valid equivalence? Oh, and was SA not the original innocent 3rd party in all this?I'm not sure comparing metaphorical killing to actual killing is a valid equivalence. Especially when you consider the actual killing was of an innocent third party
Irrelevant and completely beside my point. Let's say Steve Avery got robbed. Does me saying "The police department robbed him once when they took 18 years of his life away from him. Why wouldn't they rob him again?" make any sense? It's wordplay and nothing more.How do you think SA feels about your valid equivalence? Oh, and was SA not the original innocent 3rd party in all this?
But it's not murder, so it doesn't work for me. You can't just say it equals murder, therefor they were likely to actually murder her too. It's like some weird metaphor non sequitur.If that doesn't work for you, try this: Do you think you would be capable of railroading a guy into a life sentence just because you don't like him? I couldn't. That feels like murder to me.
The first thing I said when I was done watching Making a Murderer was: "Wow, that show will really pull you out of your naiveness."But it's not murder, so it doesn't work for me. You can't just say it equals murder, therefor they were likely to actually murder her too. It's like some weird metaphor non sequitur.
Honestly, he should just die for that. I was really sympathetic at first but by the end I wasn't really. The biggest problem is how much the police were willing to do just to get him put away. I completely agree with him being put away but not how they did it. We have enough issues with our government trying their best to take away freedoms without Wisconsin figuring out even more ways.Just fyi the "i threw the cat over the bonfire by accident" is false. According to the police report he poured gasoline on the cat then tossed into the fire while it was still alive.
What police department would that be?Just fyi the "i threw the cat over the bonfire by accident" is false. According to the police report he poured gasoline on the cat then tossed into the fire while it was still alive.
I commend your commitment to argue any and all points anyone makes and by any means necessary. You truly put the antics into semantics. Never change, Mr. Kratz.But it's not murder, so it doesn't work for me. You can't just say it equals murder, therefor they were likely to actually murder her too. It's like some weird metaphor non sequitur.
According to the police report he also raped a woman despite having a dozen or so alibis as the police refused to follow other law enforcement agencies pointing them to the actual perp.... twice. To say something is false and cite the police report after all the context we have into account is pretty ignorant. The actual truth is probably somewhere between 'accident' and 'embodiment of evil' either side would have you believe.Just fyi the "i threw the cat over the bonfire by accident" is false. According to the police report he poured gasoline on the cat then tossed into the fire while it was still alive.
It was during a party; other people saw him pour "oil" on the cat and throw it on the fire. Here is some more of your buddy Kratz:http://www.vice.com/read/comedian-je...en-kratz-vgtrnAccording to the police report he also raped a woman despite having a dozen or so alibis as the police refused to follow other law enforcement agencies pointing them to the actual perp.... twice. To say something is false and cite the police report after all the context we have into account is pretty ignorant. The actual truth is probably somewhere between 'accident' and 'embodiment of evil' either side would have you believe.
I agree.I commend your commitment to argue any and all points anyone makes and by any means necessary. You truly put the antics into semantics. Never change, Mr. Kratz.
Unrelated. Did you watch True Detective? You seem to be into crime stories so was wondering your take on it.
Yes, sir. I'm too intimidated now that he made that post about how mature and adult he is.You must've struck a nerve, he called you cocksuckerbreath. You gonna take that shit?