people are not kidding about the jesus allegories.
lol I was thinking that Man of Steel was copying
vampire's weakness from twilight: neck
You're thinking of Sean.Araysar probably loved it when Naruto and Kakashi both did it though.
I dont know what these words meanAraysar probably loved it when Naruto and Kakashi both did it though.
You are right, I misremembered it, it's been so long. But pretty much, beings on a Galactus-level of power can kill a Kryptonian.Anti-Monitor kills kara. not Darksied.
Healing factor: Superman could regenerate physical damage to his body at an accelerated rate. He was able to regenerate when Wonder Woman slit his throat with her tiara in Wonder Woman #219. In the series Batman: The Dark Knight Returns,Superman regenerates his body after being reduced to near a skeletonby a special nuke that was designed to blot out sun light and disrupt energy. Superman's healing rate has been inconsistently portrayed, however. In the first issue of the "Superman/Batman" comic, Alfred is able to remove a Kryptonite bullet from Superman's body without fear of the wound closing (probably because the Kryptonite was affecting his ability to heal).
Not sure what last few pages are about...
I just saw Man of Steel yesterday and was kinda disappointed with the ending there.
So Superman just snaps Zod's neck? How is this even possible if Zod is as strong as Superman? Does this happen in the comics? Can't Zod's body just regenerate back? They never showed where his body was disposed of. I was expecting a scene where Superman throws it into space or toward the sun or something. Am I to believe they bury him on Earth and he possibly returns in the sequel?
I actually googled this "neck-breaking" thing and it seems more of the internet is outraged that Superman actually kills someone rather than it actually being possible to do it. I don't really care if Superman kills him legit or not, but if Superman is able to break Zod's neck it seems that the same could have happened to Superman. He did take quite a beating during the last sequences.
TL;DR: I'm confused how Superman was able to break Zod's neck and where is Zod's body - possibility he returns in sequel?
Yeah, when they kissed I didn't know whether to laugh or sigh. First, like I mentioned it seemed unjustified as there simply wasn't any interpersonal development between them earlier on in the movie to make you think that they are anywhere close to having a relationship. Then add to the fact that the city has been razed to the ground and remnants of it are still falling from the sky and you just have to roll your eyes at that kiss. Talk about awkward and out of place. They had 2+ hours to cram that in somewhere else and every single minute of it would have been a better choice and more appropriate than the scene/minute they did decide to film it in. It's a perfect example of how I feel ZacSnyder just doesn't understand anything but visual appeal and action.yeah but did you like it when they were making out in the middle of the massive ruin? that was hilarious.
Like Trollface said, there was no problem with the villain. In fact, Zod carried this movie on his back not only being the best actor, but one of the few characters that actually felt "human" rather than like a cardboard cutout. I also didn't have any problem with the "mythos" or the visual look of Krypton. In fact, I found that all well done. However you can have great visuals and mythos and still have such things as a fleshed out story, meaningful dialogue, good acting, and sympathetic characters. Zod along with the epic visuals and fight scenes made this movie 'aight, but it could have been absolutely amazing if the former qualities were icing on the cake rather than a lonesome crutch trying to keep the movie interesting.Haters are why we can't have nice things.
The movie was the closest thing to a perfect Superman movie that we'll ever get. Period. Snyder did a stellar job reworking the Superman mythos, keeping it refreshing (the visual look to Krypton, etc) and not getting bogged down in useless exposition. Start to finish, Man of Steel is triumph.
We don't get many epic comic-to-movie films that deviate from the origin/villain trope that Hollywood loves so well, so when we do, we should be appreciative.
More like the actual cake mix got fucked up and baked wrong in the oven but it didn't matter because the icing decorations were exactly what the icing fetishists wanted. It looked good, but the core was shallow and tasted like burned toffee. Nevermind that Superman cake flavor is supposted to be vanilla.Like Trollface said, there was no problem with the villain. In fact, Zod carried this movie on his back not only being the best actor, but one of the few characters that actually felt "human" rather than like a cardboard cutout. I also didn't have any problem with the "mythos" or the visual look of Krypton. In fact, I found that all well done. However you can have great visuals and mythos and still have such things as a fleshed out story, meaningful dialogue, good acting, and sympathetic characters. Zod along with the epic visuals and fight scenes made this movie 'aight, but it could have been absolutely amazing if the former qualities were icing on the cake rather than a lonesome crutch trying to keep the movie interesting.
Superman I, II, III, IV and Returns were all superior.The movie was the closest thing to a perfect Superman movie that we'll ever get.