Man of Steel

Shonuff

Mr. Poopybutthole
5,538
791
I think you need to do some pushups, eat a steak, then go watch this movie again because your testosterone was too low or something.
I'm not complaining about the action, I'm complaining at the cardboard acting, wrong tone, threadbare plot and dull color palette. There was way too much grey.

All of the nerdrage you guys had against Prometheus is as a drop to the ocean to my rage on Man of Steel. I'm not in a good place right now.
 

Szlia

Member
6,627
1,373
Miami Herald: "What went wrong with Man of Steel? The early teasers promised Terrence Malick. The finished film is more Michael Bay."
Miami Herald stole my fire because I was about to say the trailers looked like a mix of Watchmen and Tree of Life while the movie was a mix of Avatar and Transformers.

To be fair, there are bits and pieces that are pretty awesome, chiefly the flying fight between Zod and Kal-El (but also a couple dozen grandiose shots - many of which were in the trailers). But terrible over-written script is terrible, terrible dialogues are terrible and there is a fine line between 'greater than life' and over-acting and for my money Michael Shannon, who I love, is on the wrong side of it this time (check him in Revolutionary Road, Shotgun Stories or Take Shelter... damn).

Also, as someone who never read a Superman comics, saw maybe one of the Reeves' Superman on TV as a child and fell asleep during Superman Returns (amusingly I fell asleep during the 'action' scene when he lift an iceberg or something...) the 'Superman does not kill' rule was unknown to me, so the Zod killing scene did not work AT ALL. I just couldn't understand his reaction upon killing Zod. What was he trying to do by punching him through buildings exactly? That, added with the oddity of him getting so worked up over four random people after leveling half the city, made for one strange climax.


PS: boooo for having Richard 'Tobey Ziegler in The West Wing' Schiff and only use him to deliver four techno-babble exposition lines.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
79,822
159,031
I think trying to summon Araysar to the thread is the sign of a desperate troll. Anyways Prometheus had a 6.5 user score and Man of Steel had a 8.2. Need I remind you how useless critics arehttp://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/simcityorhttp://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-...pected-journey? Granted there were issues with the hobbit but critics shat over that for the 48fps thing far far more then the movie itself. Same with the OMG ITS NOT SUPERMAN KING OF THE EARTH errrrrr wait!
Users are morons. Just look at all slope headed, slackjawed knuckle draggers here.

That's why critics get paid the big bucks and you post your "insights" in an internet forum named after a tranny
 

Ishad

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
4,843
4,885
Any time someone says they don't like this movie, they are called a troll.

I liked Prometheus more than this, as the plot was 10x better. For this movie, Snyder decided to make the Man of Steel more like a rampaging Hulk.
Fight scenes remind me off Miracleman vs Kid Miracle, which while awesome, I can see why old school superman fans have problems with.

rrr_img_32346.jpg
 

Oblio

Utah
<Gold Donor>
11,702
25,509
Users are morons. Just look at all slope headed, slackjawed knuckle draggers here.

That's why critics get paid the big bucks and you post your "insights" in an internet forum named after a tranny
Why you have to cut me so deep bro?
 
Finally saw it tonight. Liked it for the spin it takes on the Superman mythos, and the Zack Snyder element... both leave the movie and characters wide open for interpretation (sequels) which I think WB needs right now to do JLA well at all. My thoughts/issues/pros/cons:

1. Pa Kent being a waffling pussy about the conflict between Clark's "reveal" and yet trying to teach him to be responsible with his identity and powers *HOWEVER* his concern was probably with trying to keep a godling in check who could kill someone at will;

2. Insane amount of collateral damage by Supes;

3. No sense of developing a real connection with humans as those he's sworn to guide and protect (see above);

4. Zod, Faora and the others being 25-30 years older and looking/acting almost identical when they reach Earth (though the same issue happened in Superman II, but In MoS the villains spent far less time in the Phantom Zone);

5. Too much content variety in the same film - the problem, though, is if there was less action it would have been boring; any more, and it would have nothing to stand on (plot was light as it was, but sufficient for an action film, IMO). The irony to me is that Snyder did what many on these and other forums suggested and did a very sparse background with emphasis on Krypton - much more science fiction-oriented, which I thought was a nice twist on the retelling of Krypton, even with the Avatar elements;

6. Superman/Lois Lane's relationship developing faster than Thor and Jane Foster's;

7. Killing Zod: the biggest problem I had in this case was not him actually killing Zod, but Snyder - and Goyer - trying to make Zod a sympathetic character up to the very end. Superman had completely ended Zod's purpose for existing, but rather than have him threaten to kill Superman or every human being one by one, he bemoaned the whole issue of not having any purpose due to no longer having a Krypton to defend. Zod should have been shown to be what he was: deterministic, mad (with power), and willing to kill every human and Superman or die trying. In this way he would have been much more like Doomsday: a nearly unstoppable threat that only death could halt. By having him kill Zod, they had Superman cross into the gray area of morality, and honestly have nowhere else to go with him.

I liked it as a stand-alone film, outside of the comics. That being said, where do you go from here with character development/storyline?

7.5/10, not taking into account comic jimmies being rustled.