Fifey
Trakanon Raider
- 2,898
- 962
.Maybe humans are not meant to be monogamous? If nearly 1/3 and 1/4 of men and woman cheat, respectively..
.Maybe humans are not meant to be monogamous? If nearly 1/3 and 1/4 of men and woman cheat, respectively..
Think of a drink on a table that's mine. Accidentally this other dude takes a very large sip. Oh well, just that guy.. I'll still drink it.Why do people fixate on the number of people someone has had sex with rather than the aggregate # of times? This was always curious to me. So a chick has banged the same dude 3000 times, but only 1 dude. Second chick has banged 10 dudes, but each one only 20 times. First chick has had 15 times more sex than the second chick, but the second chick would be seen as promiscuous/slutty, while the first probably actually has a much higher sex drive.
Aside from disease (which you can get tested for), whats the deal?
From the woman's perspective at least, the first shows someone that is capable of a long term, monogamous relationship whereas the second may show the opposite.Why do people fixate on the number of people someone has had sex with rather than the aggregate # of times? This was always curious to me. So a chick has banged the same dude 3000 times, but only 1 dude. Second chick has banged 10 dudes, but each one only 20 times. First chick has had 15 times more sex than the second chick, but the second chick would be seen as promiscuous/slutty, while the first probably actually has a much higher sex drive.
Aside from disease (which you can get tested for), whats the deal?
Yeah, I think Cad is looking at it backwards.Think of a drink on a table that's mine. Accidentally this other dude takes a very large sip. Oh well, just that guy.. I'll still drink it.
Same drink, this time it goes around the room and 20 guys take very small sips. I probably do not want to drink this drink anymore.
I don't think it shows anything either way. They could just have gone through a bad phase where they picked shitty partners that they had to curb after short relationships. They could have a drinking problem and make bad decisions, etc... but later on they are perfectly capable of having a long term monogamous relationship.From the woman's perspective at least, the first shows someone that is capable of a long term, monogamous relationship whereas the second may show the opposite.
How a man looks at it may be different though.
This is just a cute metaphor for disease/cleanliness. Disease can be tested for and I'm assuming the chick has a nice shower or something between dudes.Think of a drink on a table that's mine. Accidentally this other dude takes a very large sip. Oh well, just that guy.. I'll still drink it.
Same drink, this time it goes around the room and 20 guys take very small sips. I probably do not want to drink this drink anymore.
Oh I agree with you that number is not a big deal, just stating one point of view. For me I'd be more interested in knowing relationship history than sexual partners. As long as they are safe and share the same values in a relationship as me, it's no big deal.I don't think it shows anything either way. They could just have gone through a bad phase where they picked shitty partners that they had to curb after short relationships. They could have a drinking problem and make bad decisions, etc... but later on they are perfectly capable of having a long term monogamous relationship.
Conversely people who have had only one partner long term can be emotionally stunted and immature - and vice-versa. I think number of partners is largely immaterial and greatly eclipsed by other factors.
See, Kirun is just doing us a favor. I feel enlightened.I'm just breaking down the cold reality of women and the how/why of what they do. It really isn't intended as a negative and it's unfortunate that you guys are interpreting it as such.
Oh right, I know that and you know that as well, but I think there's a mental aspect that goes along with it. Even if all those dudes just brushed their teeth and maybe I had some way of sterilizing my drink, I'd still think "This has been in many a dude's mouth." CANT EXPLAIN THATThis is just a cute metaphor for disease/cleanliness. Disease can be tested for and I'm assuming the chick has a nice shower or something between dudes.
Maybe she needs it to brush the dick taste away.That's normal. What's weird is the way a woman will suck on my dick but not want me to use her toothbrush.
BOUNDARIES, ANCIENT.That's normal. What's weird is the way a woman will suck on my dick but not want me to use her toothbrush.
The idea of using someone else's toothbrush repulses me. Completely irrational, but still the case.Have you bros really not dealt with this?
High partner count on both ends is a red flag, yes.Not in the least.^
High partner count would make me by hesitate.