Marriage and the Power of Divorce

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
43,742
52,295
My long time girlfriend of over 20 years and now my ex girlfriend

Am I reading this right and you broke up with her over this marriage thing? Or did your long time girlfriend AND a random ex girlfriend both suddenly propose to you? Cause if it's the first one, you a big dummy. If it's the second one, you're right to be spooked.
 

Vanderhoof

Trakanon Raider
1,709
1,629
He has to go sleep on his buddy's couch for a month every 8 years so they don't get common law married.
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Borzak

Bronze Baron of the Realm
25,450
33,206
One person. We lived on an off together for years and had an "agreement" to get married. I was scared to death of her father. He's a "land man" which in the part of the world he lives is a nice name of someone who screws people out of timber or mineral rights. She worked for him for a while and agrees with this.

Anyway I'll think about it. Getting expensive now. She flies in from Austin to New Orleans and comes up here an hour away on aa bi weekly or weekly basis.

The biggest downer would not be getting married. But she works at the university of Texas and lives in Austin. She works for a company that organizes and shows things the library has and goes out around on display to other areas and libraries and such. She owned a bookstore and Amazon killed that off. I thought I had it all figured out (famous last words) when I got a job as vp an hour and 15 minutes away. The other Vp his wife worked in austin and she commuted. They lived halfway between. Fantastic plan. Then I got sick. Neither one of us wanted kids which was a good fit. She was a student of mine while I was in grad school. Just folling advice of my major professer. Of course he was married to a woman who was his student years before.

Probably 25-40% of my post in the last 6 months she has made for me.

Serious thinking I'm not prepared for.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Khane

Got something right about marriage
20,342
14,006
Are you afraid of being a burden to her or just iffy on the idea of marriage in general?
 

ver_21

Molten Core Raider
975
-360
One person. We lived on an off together for years and had an "agreement" to get married. I was scared to death of her father. He's a "land man" which in the part of the world he lives is a nice name of someone who screws people out of timber or mineral rights. She worked for him for a while and agrees with this.

Anyway I'll think about it. Getting expensive now. She flies in from Austin to New Orleans and comes up here an hour away on aa bi weekly or weekly basis.

The biggest downer would not be getting married. But she works at the university of Texas and lives in Austin. She works for a company that organizes and shows things the library has and goes out around on display to other areas and libraries and such. She owned a bookstore and Amazon killed that off. I thought I had it all figured out (famous last words) when I got a job as vp an hour and 15 minutes away. The other Vp his wife worked in austin and she commuted. They lived halfway between. Fantastic plan. Then I got sick. Neither one of us wanted kids which was a good fit. She was a student of mine while I was in grad school. Just folling advice of my major professer. Of course he was married to a woman who was his student years before.

Probably 25-40% of my post in the last 6 months she has made for me.

Serious thinking I'm not prepared for.

She sounds like a good mate and friend, man. I'm glad you have someone like that.
 
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
16,741
7,767
Wife: Person A and Person A's husband will be coming over for dinner after they get out of work.

The husband has chosen they/them for pronouns, so now I have to ask what "they" refers to in that sentence. I know what you're going to say, the conjugation on the verb should 95% of the time clear up whether "they" is referring to singular person or a group. But this is text messaging, how can I be sure I trust the person to be accurate?

It was actually a spelling error, "they" was singular in this instance and referring to just the special snowflake. I asked her why it's ok to let individuals degrade collective lingual functionality. Her responses were:

It's in the dictionary.
You asked and I clarified.



Every disagreement that involves rubbing more than two brain cells together on her part, I feel myself getting closer to divorce. I apologize for the broken record rant, I'm sure some of you are rolling your eyes me. That's fine, I deserve it.

I think part of the reason I'm reticent, aside from divorce itself being a giant undertaking, is that I feel like I'll be a worse person afterwards. I'm already pretty bitter towards 3rd-wave feminism and a divorce would only intensify that. I have an established pattern of cutting things and people out of my life that become disagreeable instead of dealing with the problem. A divorce feels like more of that same bad pattern.
 

LachiusTZ

Rogue Deathwalker Box
<Silver Donator>
14,472
27,162
Wife: Person A and Person A's husband will be coming over for dinner after they get out of work.

The husband has chosen they/them for pronouns, so now I have to ask what "they" refers to in that sentence. I know what you're going to say, the conjugation on the verb should 95% of the time clear up whether "they" is referring to singular person or a group. But this is text messaging, how can I be sure I trust the person to be accurate?

It was actually a spelling error, "they" was singular in this instance and referring to just the special snowflake. I asked her why it's ok to let individuals degrade collective lingual functionality. Her responses were:

It's in the dictionary.
You asked and I clarified.



Every disagreement that involves rubbing more than two brain cells together on her part, I feel myself getting closer to divorce. I apologize for the broken record rant, I'm sure some of you are rolling your eyes me. That's fine, I deserve it.

I think part of the reason I'm reticent, aside from divorce itself being a giant undertaking, is that I feel like I'll be a worse person afterwards. I'm already pretty bitter towards 3rd-wave feminism and a divorce would only intensify that. I have an established pattern of cutting things and people out of my life that become disagreeable instead of dealing with the problem. A divorce feels like more of that same bad pattern.

Cutting it out of your life is dealing with it
 
  • 6Like
Reactions: 5 users

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,433
44,761
She's inviting SJWs into your house?! Like a vampire, you never invite them in!
 
  • 5Like
Reactions: 4 users

Pemulis

Not Woke
<Bronze Donator>
3,298
9,177
Setting aside the fact that the guy in a marriage has chosen to be plural, I just don't understand the hubris of someone who would come into your home and demand some kind of special treatment. I mean, how often are you going to refer to a guest in the third person anyway? And now that you've been made aware of this fact, you are pretty much bound to follow "their" rules or be considered insensitive. F that. It's your house. While they're there (both of them), put on a football game, drink beer, scratch your nuts, and burp loudly.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
16,741
7,767
Soygen Soygen More like sycophants. Like, I don't truly believe they're SJWs, I don't believe my wife is, but it's popular. Under the right circumstances, I will play along too. I HAVE played along. My boss rehired an intern and put him on my team this time. Except now he's a she. Didn't look much like a she, but I made sure to use the preferred pronouns.

Pemulis Pemulis I haven't actually had an opportunity to use the "wrong" pronoun with this person yet. All the arguments of this faggot's retarded decision have been between my wife and I when referring to this person. This is the stupidest part! You rarely refer to someone in the third person while they're present, so the effects of forcing people to use preferred pronouns comes when said person isn't even present.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,433
44,761
I feel like anyone who declares they/them pronouns are fully blown SJW. I've never met a single person who has even told me their pronouns, let alone something stupid like they/them.
 
  • 12Like
  • 3Solidarity
Reactions: 14 users

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
16,741
7,767
The two people I know that are playing the pronoun game, at least to the capacity I know them, have not come anywhere close to the caricature SJWs I've seen on the internet.

Nevermind, just finished writing that and reminded myself that one of them is the wife to the person that made the "Fuck the Patriarchy" needlepoint.
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
Wife: Person A and Person A's husband will be coming over for dinner after they get out of work.

The husband has chosen they/them for pronouns, so now I have to ask what "they" refers to in that sentence. I know what you're going to say, the conjugation on the verb should 95% of the time clear up whether "they" is referring to singular person or a group. But this is text messaging, how can I be sure I trust the person to be accurate?

It was actually a spelling error, "they" was singular in this instance and referring to just the special snowflake. I asked her why it's ok to let individuals degrade collective lingual functionality. Her responses were:

It's in the dictionary.
You asked and I clarified.



Every disagreement that involves rubbing more than two brain cells together on her part, I feel myself getting closer to divorce. I apologize for the broken record rant, I'm sure some of you are rolling your eyes me. That's fine, I deserve it.

I think part of the reason I'm reticent, aside from divorce itself being a giant undertaking, is that I feel like I'll be a worse person afterwards. I'm already pretty bitter towards 3rd-wave feminism and a divorce would only intensify that. I have an established pattern of cutting things and people out of my life that become disagreeable instead of dealing with the problem. A divorce feels like more of that same bad pattern.
So, I'm sure this will be a super popular take around here, but is this really this big of a deal or are you possibly just having other issues you're pissed about and using this as an excuse/opportunity to have feelings about those other issues? You could have handled it differently, laughed it off, or just said "look I don't want to be around that stuff". Instead you're like "let me pick a fight with my wife". i mean, what was even the objective here?
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

The_Black_Log Foler

PalsCo CEO - Stock Pals | Pantheon Pals
<Gold Donor>
47,682
42,921
Wife: Person A and Person A's husband will be coming over for dinner after they get out of work.

The husband has chosen they/them for pronouns, so now I have to ask what "they" refers to in that sentence. I know what you're going to say, the conjugation on the verb should 95% of the time clear up whether "they" is referring to singular person or a group. But this is text messaging, how can I be sure I trust the person to be accurate?

It was actually a spelling error, "they" was singular in this instance and referring to just the special snowflake. I asked her why it's ok to let individuals degrade collective lingual functionality. Her responses were:

It's in the dictionary.
You asked and I clarified.



Every disagreement that involves rubbing more than two brain cells together on her part, I feel myself getting closer to divorce. I apologize for the broken record rant, I'm sure some of you are rolling your eyes me. That's fine, I deserve it.

I think part of the reason I'm reticent, aside from divorce itself being a giant undertaking, is that I feel like I'll be a worse person afterwards. I'm already pretty bitter towards 3rd-wave feminism and a divorce would only intensify that. I have an established pattern of cutting things and people out of my life that become disagreeable instead of dealing with the problem. A divorce feels like more of that same bad pattern.
Why did you marry w SJW liberal feminist in the first place? I'm curious, may have missed that part.

Also thoughts and prayers.
 

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
16,741
7,767
So, I'm sure this will be a super popular take around here, but is this really this big of a deal or are you possibly just having other issues you're pissed about and using this as an excuse/opportunity to have feelings about those other issues? You could have handled it differently, laughed it off, or just said "look I don't want to be around that stuff". Instead you're like "let me pick a fight with my wife". i mean, what was even the objective here?
I would say "I don't want to be around that stuff" if I felt that would actually happen. And by "stuff", I mean I don't want any needlepoints in my house, no bumper stickers on my car, no magnets on my fridge, no tshirts on my son, and no preferred pronouns in my conversations.

I get your take, I really do. The amount of effort to call a few people by their preferred pronouns is so close to zero that it's meaningless. But it's also dangerous appeasement. Just see the above for what else it has been allowed to slip in because it's just water under the bridge. Where and when do you put your foot down?
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Khane

Got something right about marriage
20,342
14,006
I would say "I don't want to be around that stuff" if I felt that would actually happen. And by "stuff", I mean I don't want any needlepoints in my house, no bumper stickers on my car, no magnets on my fridge, no tshirts on my son, and no preferred pronouns in my conversations.

I get your take, I really do. The amount of effort to call a few people by their preferred pronouns is so close to zero that it's meaningless. But it's also dangerous appeasement. Just see the above for what else it has been allowed to slip in because it's just water under the bridge. Where and when do you put your foot down?

How do you feel about these people in general? Do you not mind being around them or would it be preferable if you never had to interact with them again? There's a couple that my gf has been friends with since she was in high school. They've known each other a very long time and the woman is fine but I absolutely cannot stand the guy. He's an insufferable, petulant little twat. So I had a long conversation with her about why I didn't like him and explained I don't want to hang out with them anymore because of him. I'll never tell her who she can and can't be friends with, and didn't try, just told her if she's hanging out with them in any capacity and he's there I won't be in attendance. She doesn't love the idea but she accepts it. Of course, being married with children is a different ball of wax but have you thought about having a conversation with your wife about not wanting to associate with them?
 

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
16,741
7,767
For the most part, they're fine. My wife is super nonconfrontational. When I was arguing(and probably will again) about the "Fuck the Patriarchy", her concern was very little about the message and mostly that her friend made it for her. That kind of apathy and nonrealization of appeasement is what troubles me the most.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Khane

Got something right about marriage
20,342
14,006
My wife is super nonconfrontational.

Do you at least chuckle over the irony of that needlepoint from time to time then? It's gotta be entertaining having new guests in the house with such an aggressive phrase hanging on the wall. It's like saying "Welcome, do you accept my challenge?"
 

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
16,741
7,767
She hangs a LOT of stuff on the walls. Usually, I'm grateful because I decorate like a man. But it also makes it hard to notice the bullshit. She honestly doesn't see "Fuck the Patriarchy" as confrontational. One of her counterpoints was that no one has said anything about yet :rolleyes:
 
  • 1WTF
Reactions: 1 user