- 25,426
- 49,042
What problems do you have that we're not being sympathetic to thats causing you to lash out? You can tell us.Your example is a bit off. How about if you were castrated?
What problems do you have that we're not being sympathetic to thats causing you to lash out? You can tell us.Your example is a bit off. How about if you were castrated?
This.I can sympathize with DW's desire to drill down to details and overfocus on the argument. I am also an engineer.
However, this is more of a big picture problem. It's not "she better give it up cuz I like sex", it's the loss of physical connection with your monogamous partner. Maybe intercourse isn't an option, but that doesn't mean you shut down everything and neglect your partner's feelings on the matter. That's a recipe for Olebass's situation, which I think we all agree is not good.
This is pure bullshit and you know it.Julian: Your example is a bit off. How about if you were castrated?
Tarrant: Sex, being intimate, making love, whatever the fuck ever, don't play semantics. If she doesn't want to hoover your dick, chances are likely she doesn't want to strip tease or put on that cute outfit either.
You have Crohns and choose to suffer through it. Good for you, seriously. Your friend plays basketball because he wants to. You see the theme here? People have to come to these choices willingly, they have to want to want it. Is it possible to overcome medication that kills your sex drive? I have no clue. But you know what doesn't help? Constantly reminding your wife that your dick needs servicing. Your needs do not help her needs, which is overcoming her disease.
Or, maybe she'll just fuck you to shut you up. Thankless sex is always fun.
Here's the overarching problem in this thread(recently): why do people feel they are owed sex?
Everyone is entitled to find a happy life. What we're saying is that for a normal young man, sex and physical intimacy is part of a happy life. If she can't or won't provide what he needs to be happy, why is it is a problem if he thinks thats unacceptable?Julian: Your example is a bit off. How about if you were castrated?
Tarrant: Sex, being intimate, making love, whatever the fuck ever, don't play semantics. If she doesn't want to hoover your dick, chances are likely she doesn't want to strip tease or put on that cute outfit either.
You have Crohns and choose to suffer through it. Good for you, seriously. Your friend plays basketball because he wants to. You see the theme here? People have to come to these choices willingly, they have to want to want it. Is it possible to overcome medication that kills your sex drive? I have no clue. But you know what doesn't help? Constantly reminding your wife that your dick needs servicing. Your needs do not help her needs, which is overcoming her disease.
Or, maybe she'll just fuck you to shut you up. Thankless sex is always fun.
Here's the overarching problem in this thread(recently): why do people feel they are owed sex?
Have you been reading this thread? Some of these stories are so depressing that "thankless, unenthusiastic sex" is an improvement of several magnitudes.I'm making the assumption that you guys don't like thankless, unenthusiastic sex.
That, in and of itself, is not a problem. The context is the problem. For Olebass, he has very little to lose, barring his girl going psycho. Chaos and others with families? They have more to consider.Everyone is entitled to find a happy life. What we're saying is that for a normal young man, sex and physical intimacy is part of a happy life. If she can't or won't provide what he needs to be happy, why is it is a problem if he thinks thats unacceptable?
Turn it from sex to another part of a happy relationship - say, kids. If I want kids and my partner can't or won't have kids, should I just say, oh well. Can't have kids, fuck it. Or should I make the most of my life and find someone who can meet my needs?
All we're telling him to do is either get her to meet his needs, or find someone who can.
Temptation, physiological response, instinct, desire. There are deeper problems here. When someone shuts off ALL intimate contact (we aren't talking just about sex here but you seem to be stuck on that one point) it's impossible to not feel as though you are no longer desirable. If your partners sex drive wanes and yours doesn't it's very noble to act like you should be completely understanding and forego your own needs for the sake of your partner but that is entirely too altruistic for most human beings to achieve. Not only that but it's such a basic, powerful want (to be loved, and intimate with someone) that it's hard to even think about living a life devoid of any physical contact.Why is it not possible to have a loving relationship with someone and not fuck them?
Exactly, and this is why me and the wife had a long talk about it. And you know what she told me? She wasnt even aware that it was a problem to begin with. But it can also expose problems she has with you as well. There usually is a reason your wife wont have sex with you that's a little bit deeper problem than libido. And its up to you to find out what the problem is and fix it to your best ability.If you shut down like that the relationship becomes completely platonic and it's enough to make you go crazy. You start to wonder what it is you're doing wrong, if she still loves you, if she wants out or worse, if she's cheating on you. It's understandable for medications and other things to lower sex drive, but it's not understandable for the person you used to be intimate with, the person you're married to, to not even be willing to talk to you about it. It's very selfish on her part.
Could we go even more basic and say a loss of libido is something along the lines of natural selection? Mental, physical, or otherwise. We are animals after all.That, in and of itself, is not a problem. The context is the problem. For Olebass, he has very little to lose, barring his girl going psycho. Chaos and others with families? They have more to consider.
Furthermore, why shouldn't the cause of the loss of libido be considered? Should you really dump someone for something that was out of their control? Something they're trying to control and fix? I think that's really short sighted and horrible advice.
Really wish there was a meme of Carlin telling 12-steppers to drop some of their needs.
So let me get this straight, were all just supposed to grin and bear it when our wives turn off the sex spigot completely? Just go and whack one off? Accept the hug and move along to our corner of the room?If Tarrant just wants a forehead kiss and some cuddling and his wife won't do that, that's another problem altogether. I would argue those are different forms of intimacy, ones that don't require sexual desire. Are we not assuming this discussion is about sexual intimacy?
You keep giving examples where communication is the problem. I think the other people having problems here are well past that.Exactly, and this is why me and the wife had a long talk about it. And you know what she told me? She wasnt even aware that it was a problem to begin with. But it can also expose problems she has with you as well. There usually is a reason your wife wont have sex with you that's a little bit deeper problem than libido. And its up to you to find out what the problem is and fix it to your best ability.
My problem? I was gaming to much. Kids went to sleep and I was gaming. Not doing my part to be a good partner for her. So i fixed that.
Depends completely on the context of the situation. What caused it? Have you discussed the consequences fully of any decision? But yeah, grin and bear it might be the best solution in some cases.So let me get this straight, were all just supposed to grin and bear it when our wives turn off the sex spigot completely? Just go and whack one off? Accept the hug and move along to our corner of the room?
When it's known for gay men to have kids(with a woman) and families, I would say no.Could we go even more basic and say a loss of libido is something along the lines of natural selection? Mental, physical, or otherwise. We are animals after all.