You and I (and some other people) weren't actually arguing the same thing. You thought I was defending a woman cheating and the factors that play into it. I thought you knew I was talking about biological and physiological desires in human beings precluding relationship factors, male and female, and how actual scientific studies have shown that we aren't all that different in terms of what we want out of sex.
My argument when a man got cheated on was "That sucks bro, definitely a betrayal, but your situation is rough. Rough on the both of you, I don't know what the answer is for you personally but you might want to at least consider an open relationship."
One statement made before I responded to something completely unrelated (Hoss' idiotic generalization about how women are brainless balls of emotion and men just want to nut) got interpreted as a continuation even though the two were completely unrelated.
I don't know how many times I have to say it to you.