The Ancient_sl
shitlord
- 7,386
- 16
http://supernerdland.com/shouting-void-hang-moderators/Here's what we're going to do. There are three inactive mods for the most part, and I would be grateful for additional help in keeping the ship on course here. If you are interested in actually helping the community please put your name in the hat and I'll consider your interest. Then once all the names are accumulated, if there are more than three, we'll have a vote for them and we can get some voting specialists here to run the vote. If there are enough we can do something like folks have done in screenshots.
If you want to be a mod these are your duties:
1) Give people asking for access, access from the Waiting Room (If you've had an account here for long than 8ish months, you don't even see this forum). Dozens or so per week sometimes. Usually takes a few minutes to go through.
2) Respond to reports which are typically gore or nsfw material in the wrong places.
3) Keep people from shitposting all over the place while being somewhat lenient on letting people go at each other. Typically this is the usual suspects that you all know and love.
4) Cleaning up spam bots.
5) Continuous discussion with the other mods about the direction of the community, and discuss any infractions that are in place. Usually this constitutes to respond to a few posts a week based on any infractions. It's really no big deal and by "direction of the community" I mean, should we really let kegkilla call everyone a faggot in every one of his posts and not infract him, or should he be RRPd for a week because he won't stop shitposting in the Star Wars thread after many warnings?
The people who can be mods are people that I can trust not to fuck shit up and are actually responsible members of this community. So if you have a history of being a racist piece of shit and a hateful troll you basically shouldn't apply.
Carry on.
This never happened. Unless you count Tanoomba, who I didn't argue with. I just infracted, and that's because I was specifically made a mod to do exactly that.I actually thought hodj did a decent job as a moderator until he started infracting people he was arguing with.
You can't take it back. You fed the mogwai after midnight.Oh crap, I take it back.
A stalwart against conclusion.I am a wall against robots, a tyrant against moon bats.
The Man, The Myth, The Experience.A stalwart against conclusion.
Infractions shouldn't remove modship, but I never tested it. It's probably a separate action. Second, I never got involved in any of those threads or actually jumped in there. I just assumed whatever was reported in the mod thread was what actually happened and left it at that.This never happened. Unless you count Tanoomba, who I didn't argue with. I just infracted, and that's because I was specifically made a mod to do exactly that.
You did, it was Tanoomba.Yeah I don't remember what was said in the moderator thread, but I know for a fact I never infracted anyone who was arguing with me in some thread. Like I didn't infract Cad for the debate we were having when I was demodded, for instance.
I just want the record clear is all. Its only fair that my time as moderator is judged based on what I did do.
Incorrect. I was explicitly promotd to moderator to put tanoomba in line, and i wasnt arguing with him at the time in any thread.You did, it was Tanoomba.
Fine, you were involved in a "discussion" with him, whatever. We had a big discussion in the infraction thread about how we generally try not to infract in situations we are involved in. I read the thread today.Incorrect. I was explicitly promotd to moderator to put tanoomba in line, and i wasnt arguing with him at the time in any thread.
What part of I was explicitly given moderator powers explicitly to rickshaw tanoomba for his posting in the gamergate thread by tuco are you failing to grasp here exactly?Fine, you were involved in a "discussion" with him, whatever. We had a big discussion in the infraction thread about how we generally try not to infract in situations we are involved in. I read the thread today.
#GamerGate - A Problematic Debate - Page 782
^ the offending post. I'm not even saying you were wrong in infracting him, I don't care.