NBA 2012-13 Season Thread - Crown The Heat!

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Gaige

Legal Ephebophile
1,912
116
Eric Spoelstra best coach in the NBA. Beat Pop in the Finals and second longest tenure!
 

Slaythe

<Bronze Donator>
3,389
141
I'm biased but I put Adelman up with the elite. As far as someone that takes what's in front of him and does the most with it. I mean just look at this track record. He took over for Portland, coached less than half a season and won 14 games and was sub 500 overall. The next year? 59 wins and 5 straight winning seasons. 27 wins Kings team to 8 straight .500+ seasons. The Van Gundy Rockets weren't bad, but he improved their record and had 4 winning seasons.

The Wolves and a brief stop in GS are literally the only two teams in his 24 year career that he's inherited and not had above 500 within 1 year of taking over. That's beyond impressive. And if we hadn't had injury hell these last two seasons it would apply to us too.

So for me: Adelman, Thibs, Carlisle (definitely think he belongs) and Pop. Spoelstra I guess based on success but I don't think he's that great (which I guess is Ambiturner's point). I expect Budenholzer to be highly regarded before too long as well and also think Dwane Casey is a good coach but still too new. Karl in this second tier as well.

Man that's a tiny list even with me adding a couple.
 

Man0warr

Molten Core Raider
2,265
171
I wouldn't even put Rivers or Carlisle in there.
Carlisle has been good every where he's gone, there's no way he isn't on a list of elite coaches. Only reasons he resigned/was fired from the Pistons and Pacers was front office friction, nothing to do with his coaching.

Oh yeah, and he coached a team that beat 2 more talented teams (OKC, Heat) and swept the a Phil Jackson coached Lakers on the way to a Championship. Behind the strength of a single All-Star and some elite-level rotation changes (Starting JJ Barea at the start of Game 4 in the Finals, for example).

I wouldn't say Mark Jackson is easily replaceable for the Warriors.
Debatable, though he was definitely an upgrade if for nothing else than motivating his players. He's only been on a the job 1 year, and it coincided with Steph Curry being mostly healthy for the first time in his career and Klay Thompson busting out.
 

Tarrant

<Prior Amod>
15,782
9,193
Carlisle has been good every where he's gone, there's no way he isn't on a list of elite coaches. Only reasons he resigned/was fired from the Pistons and Pacers was front office friction, nothing to do with his coaching.
Not so much true with the Pistons. I liked Carlisle a lot but he lacked what it took to push the Pistons over that hump so they dumped him, a point that was proven when Brown took over.
 

Djay

Trakanon Raider
2,307
359
It's really hard to distinguish a coach from his players...and the best coach in the world will not win multiple Championships without Hall of Famers on his roster. It took Malone and Stockton retiring before people really gave Sloan the credit that he deserved.

With that said, if all rosters were created equally, my short list would be Pops, Carlisle, and Thibs...while also trying to talk Sloan out of retirement.
 

ham

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,489
92
Thibs and Pop are the only elite coaches in the NBA, there's a few good one, but they're the only ones I think truly get the most out of their players and it doesn't matter where they are to do it. Vogel and Carlisle maybe. Adelman is great at taking your team to above average status.
 

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,043
19,530
I'd have to see someone win multiple titles with multiple teams to really be able to consider them elite. I give Pop a pass on that because a consistent title threat for that amount of time counts.

Has Phil Jackson benefited from amazing rosters? Of course, but it's hard to argue anyone could have done better than 11 championships. He wins a title over 50% of the time.

Carlisle is a good coach for sure, but outside of 1 amazing postseason where his team beat 3 more talented teams they probably had no business beating, he hadn't had that much success.

That's why off the top of my head I can only think of Phil, Pop, and Riley.
 

Djay

Trakanon Raider
2,307
359
Carlisle was a big reason for most of Bird's success in Indiana (according to Bird) and was doing a phenomenal job there until the brawl decimated his roster.

The Mt. Rushmore of NBA Coaching is Auerbach, Pop, Riley, and Jackson. Red had Russell, Pop had Duncan, Riley had Kareem/Magic, and Jackson had Jordan/O'Neal/Bryant.
The difference between them and people like Sloan, Carlisle, and Hubie Brown...is that they had once-in-a-generation talent on their teams. (I love Malone and Stockton, but they aren't Jordan...and I believe a lot of their success was due to Sloan's system.) If you switched Sloan and Jackson, do you think Jordan wins less than 6 championships? Do you think the Jazz win more than 0? The players they coached played a tremendous role in all 4 legacies.
 

Pharazon

Silver Knight of the Realm
413
46
Yeah I'd put Adleman in Tier 2 because of his track record. Tier 1 is Popovich, all by himself. Adleman has overachieved with the talent he's had in a number of places, he's just never had that one player on any of his teams. Drexler and Webber were the closest things he had to a superstar... great players, but guys that just weren't quite great enough to overcome the talent they had to face in order to win it all (Jordan+Pippen, Kobe+Shaq).

No NBA draft talk.. granted, the talent does suck this year, moreso than in any draft in memory.
 

MAXPOWERS_sl

shitlord
271
2
Frank Vogel has had a lot of success during his short tenure in the league. Hopefully he continues to grow with the Pacers. Hopefully Shaw leaving doesnt stunt his growth.
 

Slaythe

<Bronze Donator>
3,389
141
If the Cavs select Alex Len tonight, I will shoot someone in the goddamn face.
Seriously. The hype that still exists around non productive big men is crazy. Noel is theobviousnumber one pick this year. The only other prospect the Cavs should even be contemplating is Porter and that's only under some misguided idea that he'll help more in the short term (which might be true but is piss poor draft strategy).

Biggest surprise to me this year is Zeller slipping. He would have gone top 5 after his freshman season, regressed a tad playing out of position his sophomore year and then this whole deal about him being undersized circulated all over the place. He does kind of have t rex arms but his athletic testing was off the charts and he was very productive in college. He doesn't have quite the same wingspan but if I was to compare him to another player coming out college it would be Aldridge. Now with draft picks who knows if they pan out but Zeller looks like he's slipping down past 9 (unless the Bobcats take him) and you could do a lot worse that late in the lottery.

If he's there at 9 i think he's without question the BPA by a large margin. However, with team need and also the fact that we have to coddle Love, I'm not upset if we end up with KCP or Mccollum. Mccollum seems like a really awesome, intelligent kid that would be fun to root for, but I'm scared of combo guards after Foye. I really like KCP a lot. This is all predicated on Flip not figuring out a way into the top 4 to get Oladipo which is his preference.

NBA draft night is one of my favorite nights of the year.
 

Obsidian

<Bronze Donator>
755
1,187
I'm a bit of a homer being a Maryland alum, but Len was mostly unproductive because the guard play on the Terps last year was not ACC caliber in the least. The point in particular, I believe I read a stat that Howard had the lowest true shot % in ACC history or something crazy. Every team essentially doubled Len the instant he touched the ball and the few games where he was not doubled were the games that he was productive. If you put him on a team with even respectable outside threats I think he'll be a solid player. Whether he should be #1 overall is debatable but with this weak draft its not so bad and I think he'll be a better player than Noel. Noel has absolutely no offensive game besides put backs.
 

Foggy

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
6,292
4,878
I'm a bit of a homer being a Maryland alum, but Len was mostly unproductive because the guard play on the Terps last year was not ACC caliber in the least. The point in particular, I believe I read a stat that Howard had the lowest true shot % in ACC history or something crazy. Every team essentially doubled Len the instant he touched the ball and the few games where he was not doubled were the games that he was productive. If you put him on a team with even respectable outside threats I think he'll be a solid player. Whether he should be #1 overall is debatable but with this weak draft its not so bad and I think he'll be a better player than Noel. Noel has absolutely no offensive game besides put backs.
Noel had a higher FG % from midrange than Len.
 

Slaythe

<Bronze Donator>
3,389
141
So the advanced stats guys have keyed in on steal rate being one of the few stats you can look at as a real determination for how well a college player will translate to the NBA. When looking at big man, this isn't really that intuitive so most people that either aren't fans of sabermetrics or only have fleeting interest (know what PER is don't dive into it any more) dismiss the idea from the get go.

But if you analyze it a little further I don't think it's that crazy. You aren't comparing things across position so the fact that centers get less steals than guards doesn't matter. You're comparing center steal rates to other centers. And just in general I think it makes sense that steals and intangible things like court vision and anticipation probably go together.

So take that for what it's worth. Disagree that steals matter for big men or agree that there might be something to it. But it is factual that there is a correlation between steal rate and NBA success. It's over 25 years of analyzed data, but maybe it's just a correlation.

Now in regards to Len. His steal rate is historically bad. It's actually the second worst of any player across that entire data set. He grabbed one steal every 120 minutes of college play. For comparison purposes, here's the entire list of players to play at least 1,000 minutes in college and record less than half a steal per 40:

afcXOez_medium.png


(Credit vjl110 over at CanisHoopus for this data)

The Len fans simply disregard this. "Steals aren't his game" being what is said the most but if you buy the correlation at all he's so historically bad that I wouldn't touch him with a ten foot pole. To me it says he's not a very intelligent player. The rest of his stats are middle of the road (these are the ones you can try and explain by his guard play around him but steals isn't one of those) but who knows...maybe he is. Stats don't mean everything.
 

Obsidian

<Bronze Donator>
755
1,187
I'm not making the argument that Len is going to be some amazing player, keep that in mind. I think his ceiling (which he will almost undoubtedly not reach) is probably like 25/12 and realistically I think he'll pan out to be a 15/10 type player. Solid, unspectacular, definitely not a franchise changing talent. I'm not disputing Foggy's point about FG% either, stats are stats, but from an eyeball test Noel just doesn't bring it offensively. Neither does Len for that matter, but I think he has far more potential than Noel. Noel is also far too thin to really be a pivot right now, I guess he could move to the 4 but he might be too skinny there as well.
 

jeydax

Death and Taxes
1,405
915
Biggest surprise to me this year is Zeller slipping. He would have gone top 5 after his freshman season, regressed a tad playing out of position his sophomore year and then this whole deal about him being undersized circulated all over the place.
Correct me if I'm wrong but Zeller played like a scared little girl in the NCAA tourny. That is against mediocre to good talent. Imagine him playing the most elite players in the world on a nightly basis?
 

Slaythe

<Bronze Donator>
3,389
141
Correct me if I'm wrong but Zeller played like a scared little girl in the NCAA tourny. That is against mediocre to good talent. Imagine him playing the most elite players in the world on a nightly basis?
Who gives a shit? It's comments like these that made people think Harden wasn't worth a max deal or that LeBron would never win a championship. Zeller played 72 college basketball games. You're welcome to base your opinion off 3 of those if you want.
 

jeydax

Death and Taxes
1,405
915
I don't give a shit personally, just explaining why he slipped. This year's draft is boring as fuck.