NFL 2016 - <whatever Tony is doing>

Alex

Still a Music Elitist
14,540
7,485
But the Giants' record looks like it might be too good for them to win it all. They need to be a nine win team to have a chance.
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

Lleauaric

Sparkletot Monger
4,058
1,823
Using that ESPN Playoff Machine, the Pats game pretty much determines if the Broncos make the playoffs or not.

Tough game to win for Patriots in Mile High. Despite being a Pats fan, if that line is under 3, Ima take the Broncos, so at least I win either way.
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
25,899
13,454
I tried that philosophy back when I bet on the cowboys. It never eased the pain of losing.
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

moontayle

Golden Squire
4,302
165
I've always kind of enjoyed the Pythagorean Expectation number as a means to get a larger sense of what might be a reasonable expectation on wins. For instance, the Texas Rangers had a PE number that was around 82 wins, far below the 95 they ended up with, indicating a season of over-achievement. And in the post-season the over-achievement caught up to them. For football it's a number that's difficult to really get a sense on until around week 10, which we're past.

The PE formula is: (pointsScored ^ 2.37 / (pointsScored ^ 2.37 + pointsAgainst ^ 2.37)) * 16

The Giants number comes out to 8.77, so about 9 wins expected as things current stand.
The Redskins number comes out to 8.56, so with the tie that would be pretty accurate if they only win 2 more games.
The Eagles number comes out to 9.64, so they are underachieving pretty hardcore at the moment and would need to win out to meet this expectation.
The Dallas number comes out to 11.5, so 1-2 more wins is a reasonable expectation based upon how they've done so far.

Weird statistical anomaly here as Giants, Eagles, and Cowboys have all allowed the same number of points against at 213.

Of course like most things of this nature you kind of have to take it with a grain of salt. Sometimes the play on the field belies the numbers, and in the end, like I said above, all you really need to do is make it to the playoffs. A good JG staple is that at the end of the day a team controls its own destiny. Sometimes a little luck helps though.
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

Alex

Still a Music Elitist
14,540
7,485
I wasn't aware of that formula. Interesting. Bengals come out to 7.44. At the very best they'll get three more wins. One or two is more likely. So hey, at least they're only underperforming right?!?
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
37,179
119,481
That seems like it'd work better for baseball where there are a ton more games.

In football, schedule is a lot more meaningful because you can end up with an easier or more difficult schedule than your division, or easier/harder portions at the beginning or end. The Giants for instance have played an easier schedule that they're performing as expected against. But that doesn't take into account their future opponents who may wipe the floor with them.

The Eagles built up a high point differential at the beginning of the season where no one had a good scheme against their rookie QB (which is a normal phenomenon), but they've fallen off hard since.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 users

skrala

Silver Knight of the Realm
316
53
The Eagles are playing like everyone expected them to at the start of the season, it was just thrown off by the 3-0 start. They're a .500 team with very few offensive weapons, a rookie qb with a banged up o-line, and a first year coach. They're in most games with a chance to win, but they're not a good team.
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

Itlan

Blackwing Lair Raider
4,994
744
What is this difficult schedule you guys keep talking about? The Steelers and the Lions? Seriously? The same Lions team who lost to the Bears and the Texans? Steelers team who lost to the Eagles and Dolphins? (Since we want to talk about how the Giants only beat the Bengals by 1 eh?)

Outside of those two there's 3 divisional games where records and previous play simply does not matter. We're 2-1 in the division this year. We could easily be 3-0 or 0-3. Divisional football you throw everything away.

I'm not fearful of this schedule at all.
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
25,899
13,454
Oh you mean me responding when people quote and post to me? Fuck off dude. Maybe you're the type to lay down and not defend yourself but if you haven't noticed that's not me. Retard tried to change terms on bet and you think I should be silent about it? You're the last person that should be telling someone to shut up with all your Jeff Fisher crying. I've posted more bc people were trying to add shit to a bet that was never agreed on.

So how long before he posts in here again? If he keeps his word, it'll be never. Not even once the ban is lifted after the SB.
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

Kaines

Potato Supreme
17,178
47,006
What is this difficult schedule you guys keep talking about? The Steelers and the Lions? Seriously? The same Lions team who lost to the Bears and the Texans? Steelers team who lost to the Eagles and Dolphins? (Since we want to talk about how the Giants only beat the Bengals by 1 eh?)

Outside of those two there's 3 divisional games where records and previous play simply does not matter. We're 2-1 in the division this year. We could easily be 3-0 or 0-3. Divisional football you throw everything away.

I'm not fearful of this schedule at all.

With the exception of TWO games, it's the same schedule that a couple weeks ago was called the "easiest in the league" when the Cowboys played it. Every divisional team plays the EXACT SAME non-divisional schedule with the exception of 2 games. So now everyone wants to say the Giants have it so tough. I really wish sports talking heads would pick a fucking narrative and stick with it.
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,235
I'm a Lions fan and I'm pretty nervous about that Giants game. And the rest of our schedule. Tho I'm pretty sure at this point we are going to beat the Bears in a couple weeks, but even that's far from sure.

Lions remaining schedule:

@Saints
Bears
@Giants
@Cowboys (on MNF the day after Christmas, ugh)
Packers

We are in first in the NFC North but if we start playing like the Lions of ole then we could very well sink below the wild card slots even.
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
25,899
13,454
With the exception of TWO games, it's the same schedule that a couple weeks ago was called the "easiest in the league" when the Cowboys played it. Every divisional team plays the EXACT SAME non-divisional schedule with the exception of 2 games. So now everyone wants to say the Giants have it so tough. I really wish sports talking heads would pick a fucking narrative and stick with it.

Is it possible that some of those opponents are better or worse than they were last year?
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
25,899
13,454
Convo Convo

Guys, he's pms'ing me now, what do I do? Oops, that's pm'ing.

Does Convo Convo look anything like this?

vl9sp.jpg
 
  • 1Cutler
  • 1Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 2 users

Convo

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
8,761
613
Cutler! Haha! Seriously tho. Some of you are really weak sheep trying to pile on when you think someone is in despair. What a bunch of beta pussies. Worst of all you're be lead around by a Dallas group.

And Daezul, seriously... you're the biggest baby in this thread. You can't be serious with this crybaby stuff? I accepted my ban like a man and bunch chumps wanted to change it.
 
  • 3Cutler
Reactions: 2 users

Hoss

Make America's Team Great Again
<Gold Donor>
25,899
13,454
You should wentz the shit out of all these posts, bro.
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user

Convo

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
8,761
613
That just shows how bad people are here. Making something that will need to be changed to Dak when he has the expected implosion that we all know is coming.
 
  • 1Cutler
Reactions: 1 user