Yeah I have heard that as well, and that is just not something that excites me. While I think he is an upgrade over Jimmy G, I wouldn't want them to give up much for a 32 year old QB who isn't going to automatically get you wins like someone like Watson would.Yesterday, someone was saying 49'ers are on the fast track for Stafford currently, will try and dig it up. Rodgers isn't going anywhere unless GB decides they can't afford him. His message was one of MO MONEY.
I am kinda leaning at being a Packers fan since they are on national broadcasts all the time. However, if Rodgers isn't long for that team and the league, idk if I want to get on that bandwagon.If Burrow is irreparably damaged I might be the same. Burrow was the a sign of hope and the future and we let him get devastated before he could finish his first year. Although his rehab looks insane. We was walking completely normally already just a few weeks ago.
Rodgers is looking for the Patrick price and his Rodgers rate is real bad. Thanks State Farm!Yesterday, someone was saying 49'ers are on the fast track for Stafford currently, will try and dig it up. Rodgers isn't going anywhere unless GB decides they can't afford him. His message was one of MO MONEY.
Darth Bill had to start in Cleveland. Its a good way to get into the coaching ranks, which we all know is an incestuous money train.Houston is a shitshow, but it's a HC job, pretty hard to turn something like that down I'd imagine.
Yeah he is headed for a contract restructuring. One that gives him more money, but alleviates short term cap issues. Basically kicking the can down the road and making sure the next QB under center gets murdered. That said, he might be butthurt enough about the NFCCG to walk.Rodgers isn't going anywhere. And I wouldn't hold your breath on Watson either. While it is nice to dream about, I just don't think they will have the capital to go get him.
I think it would be a pretty big upgrade personally. I think Shanahan's playcalling is pretty handicapped by Jimmy G's limitations. That wouldn't be an issue with Stafford. Shanahan doesn't need a superstar quarterback, just someone who can stay healthy, read the field, and make all the throws ala Matt Ryan, and Stafford has a pretty good record at all of that. It would be nice if he wasn't 32, but if they can get 4 good years out of him that's all you can really expect before having to do a major rebuild these days anyway. They can probably get him for a single first round pick as well unlike these other guys.Yeah I have heard that as well, and that is just not something that excites me. While I think he is an upgrade over Jimmy G, I wouldn't want them to give up much for a 32 year old QB who isn't going to automatically get you wins like someone like Watson would.
If Brady wins a 7th without Bellicheat by beating the reigning champs (and Big Balls Reid), he'll forever be the Jordan of the NFL. He's already the consensus GOAT for QB's, but he'll even put distance between himself and legends like Jim Brown and Dick Butkus.So, what happens if Brady beats Mahomes?
That would be SEVEN Super Bowls for him, and he would have just beat defending champ and second coming to his throne. Not only that but he would win with another team in another conference. It would be too much almost to imagine. If Mahomes wins he puts Brady to bed and continues his rocketship ascent.
I think they are fine with Aiyuk and Deebo (assuming he can stay healthy), and don't need to spend high on a WR. They really need to get some CB help.I think Stafford and a high draft WR immediately makes 49ers a scary team.
You dont draft a QB round 1 if you plan to keep paying a max contract QB for 4+ more years.Yesterday, someone was saying 49'ers are on the fast track for Stafford currently, will try and dig it up. Rodgers isn't going anywhere unless GB decides they can't afford him. His message was one of MO MONEY.
They completely revamped all of their strength and conditioning, plus rehab staff year before last.Did the 9ers fire their strength and conditioning coach yet?
This is my thought as well, but on the other hand where can he go that the tools are in place to win now that can afford to have him? Tampa already has Brady and he is frankly the GOAT for his lack of greed and how it allows for a deeper roster, as much as anything else. Rodgers is greedier for money and stats than rings. Honestly with Stafford out on the marked, teams are going to look at that and say "well we can save a few bucks on him and still have money to spend elsewhere" compared to Rodgers who (while significantly better) will charge a premium for the difference in QB quality. And then you need a coach who he respects (none exist) or otherwise will simply put up with his ego. That (if Rape Ape retired) rules out Pittsburg and possibly New England (no way Darth Bill puts up with his passive aggressive shit).You dont draft a QB round 1 if you plan to keep paying a max contract QB for 4+ more years.
I generally agree with you, but that's pretty close to what they did with Favre and Rodgers earlier.You dont draft a QB round 1 if you plan to keep paying a max contract QB for 4+ more years.