Captain Suave
Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
- 5,077
- 8,622
IUDs work great until they don't. My wife has had them dislodge twice and needed (minor) surgery for a perforated uterus.
- 1
- 1
IUDs work great until they don't. My wife has had them dislodge twice and needed (minor) surgery for a perforated uterus.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27771475/ said:Overall evidence suggests that the risk of adverse outcomes related to pregnancy, perforation, infection, heavy bleeding or removals for bleeding among young IUD users is low and may not be clinically meaningful. However, the risk of expulsion, especially for Cu-IUDs, is higher for younger women compared with older women. If IUD expulsion occurs, a young woman is exposed to an increased risk of unintended pregnancy if replacement contraception is not initiated. IUDs are safe for young women and provide highly effective reversible contraception.
Get a gyno to deposit it, ultrasound verify.
Getting snipped is just insane from my pov.
Get a gyno to deposit it, ultrasound verify. It is the way. Getting snipped is just insane from my pov.
Here's for young women for instance.
https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/112/1/71/5497506 said:Overall, vasectomized men had an increased risk of prostate cancer compared with nonvasectomized men (relative risk = 1.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.10 to 1.20). The increased risk of prostate cancer following vasectomy persisted for at least 30 years after the procedure and was observed regardless of age at vasectomy and cancer stage at diagnosis.
https://en.ssi.dk/news/news/2019/vasectomy-is-associated-with-increased-risk-of-prostate-cancer said:Vasectomy is not risk-free
Statens Serum Institut emphasises that the biggest risk factor is whether the father or brother of the man who develops prostate cancer has the disease.
“Just like studies indicate that birth-control pills increase women's risk of developing breast cancer, a vasectomy is apparently not all risk-free either. Nothing in our study suggests that vasectomy does not increase the risk of developing prostate cancer.”
“There might also be an association between other elements of male reproductive health and the risk of developing prostate cancer,” concludes Anders Husby.
Food for thought, 15% increased risk of prostate cancer when you get snipped. Risk persists for 30 years.
It's important to note that the 15% is relative risk, not absolute (base risk times 1.15, not base + 15%). Still worth thinking about if you're otherwise at higher risk for prostate cancer.
Erm, no it is terrible and swift.Doesn't everyone get prostate cancer if they live long enough anyway? And haven't they stopped doing treatment for it because it's not that terrible?
Erm, no it is terrible and swift.
There are several that are. Colon cancer can be swift or it could be several years. Like most cancers it depends on when you’re diagnosed, how old you are and how early you caught it. The survival rate has gone up because we started checking for it so often and at early ages. I don’t think there’s an easy way to early detect pancreatic like the ole finger up the ass colon cancer has, which is why the survival time frame is much shorter.Ain't that pancreatic that's terrible and swift?
Half of 90 years old have prostate cancer. Very few die of it. Only 2% of men die of it. Would seem to be one of the least dangerous and to progress very slowly in the vast majority of case. To the point that screening isn't recommanded in most cases.Erm, no it is terrible and swift.
1 out of 50 men dying from it seems high to me. But, it sounds more survivable than I thought. I’ve only know two people with it and they were both dead in under a year. Glad it’s not as bad as it seems!Half of 90 years old have prostate cancer. Very few die of it. Only 2% of men die of it. Would seem to be one of the least dangerous and to progress very slowly in the vast majority of case. To the point that screening isn't recommanded in most cases.
It's still cancer. Once you get into your 40s your doctor should be reminding you to get one every few 5-10 years. More if you have family history, or if they find polyps.Half of 90 years old have prostate cancer. Very few die of it. Only 2% of men die of it. Would seem to be one of the least dangerous and to progress very slowly in the vast majority of case. To the point that screening isn't recommanded in most cases.