That is way too broad to have any meaning. You're essentially railing against any and all forms of power structure by that statement. In this sense, feminism loses any definition as a word in of itself. Now, it may benefit feminists to do this, as it obfuscates the intent of their movement, absolutely agreed. But make no mistake: their intent is not to do away with it, but to replace men atop it.
Red Pill Thread 2.0: Neckbeard Revenge
- Thread starter Himeo
- Start date
-
Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!
Go here and give us your nominations!Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
khalid
Unelected Mod
- 14,071
- 6,775
One of the few good things about Marxism is its equality of the sexes. I find it amusing that is the one part of it Dumar apparantly disagrees with.
I'm all for equality and its inherent idealism when there'strue equality. The tenets of feminism are not anything close. It's a movement whose aim is to supersede masculinity with femininity in the socio-political power structures of modern society, not to end the structures themselves. It was never about equal footing.
When you equate this with Marxian ideals, whose goals are to end labor exploitation under capitalism, socialism, and you then lump all of these things into a 'liberal Left', you've lost all sense of the definitions, concrete meanings of words. It is intellectually dishonest, and feminism does this very well.
All you have to do is look to their leader, Sheryl Sandberg, for all you want to know, who had very insightful commentary about interpersonal relationships in her book. She advocatesexactly and preciselythe script RP says women follow, and I don't think she's aware she's letting the cat outta the bag, so to speak:
Sheryl Sandberg_sl said:
Arbitrary
Tranny Chaser
- 28,957
- 79,437
Big Phoenix
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 46,374
- 98,491
How fucking delusional are you? Seriously. You have some severely screwed up ideas on sex, women and relationships and it painfully obvious by what you have posted on here(consistently cheating, retarded hookups). You didnt lose your virginity until 26 and because of that youve developed some crazy ideas combined with the fact you think you need to make up for all that lost pussy.
Newsflash, not everyone loses their virginity at 15 and a lot of people go through life without almost drowning in pussy during high school and college. Case and point, I didnt lose my virginity until I was 23 years old, AFTER I spent a year in Iraq and eventually got out of the military. Since then Ive banged 5 girls, thats it.
Seriously get the fuck over your past and being a loser or unattractive or whatever your problems were in your teens. All its done so far is lead you down a path of self loathing and pity and eventually it will be self destruction(ya know, when you beat/drug that women for not giving into how damn smooth you are or you wind up with a kid with a complete bitch because all you can pull are the crazies).
Mist
REEEEeyore
- 31,197
- 23,354
Other than the first two which are absurd, I don't see how the others represent misandry unless you're just absolutely terrible at reading comprehension.Yeah, no.
Lithose
Buzzfeed Editor
- 25,946
- 113,036
She is engaging in a bit of semantics. Misandry involves the hatred of men; attribution of negative traits based purely on the premise of physical characteristic (Of gender) is just plain oldsexism. Tedious, I know.
Mist
REEEEeyore
- 31,197
- 23,354
Sheryl Sandberg wouldn't know feminism if it bit her on the ass. She's an MBA, a professional widget seller. Her claim to fame is being the COO of a company who's business model is the complete obliteration of the privacy (a fundamental human right) of everyone on the planet. She's a fascist and is an example of what I'm talking about, that what feminists label as the patriarchy can take many forms.
Arbitrary
Tranny Chaser
- 28,957
- 79,437
It's an opportunity to argue about something other than her claim that Feminism and Marxism are kissing cousins.
They aren't.
Arbitrary
Tranny Chaser
- 28,957
- 79,437
Mist
REEEEeyore
- 31,197
- 23,354
"Women have very little idea how much men hate them." -Absolutely true, and has nothing to do with misandry. Most women don't have any idea how much men hate women. After reading redpill nonsense, I'm starting to get a pretty good idea.
"Rape is regarded by society as a normal male behavior" - Note what the quote says, not even close. You'd need to know what a spectrum of behaviors means from a psychological sense, it has a very specific meaning. Remember that rape IS still a norm in many present day cultures.
"Those falsely accused of rape can use that nightmare scenario as an opportunity for self-introspection" -Not what the quote says, but not entirely off the mark either, but not misandry. What she's saying is that you might want to think why what you did could possibly be construed as rape, and on the topic of introspection I'd like to add that men falsely accused of rape should use that scenario to imagine what being raped is like; aka having someone take advantage of you and violate you just because they think they can get away with it.
Also self-introspection is the most redundant word I've seen all day, congrats.
Mist
REEEEeyore
- 31,197
- 23,354
Parent/child actually. Marx IS the father of *all* conflict theory in sociology. Feminism is a major child branch of conflict theory. These are indisputable facts.
RP doesn't hate women at all - quite the opposite; no idea where that came from. If anything, RP men are conforming to what women find attractive, so, in actuality, women should be thankful for it. The only aspect objectionable by women is making men aware of the wall and women's script because of it.
If women feel they've been manipulated, or played, or gamed, etc., then that's where the self-introspection needs to be, as inwhy are you falling for it. (And I can already tell you the answer: because you want to.)
If women feel they've been manipulated, or played, or gamed, etc., then that's where the self-introspection needs to be, as inwhy are you falling for it. (And I can already tell you the answer: because you want to.)
Yep, but again, means nothing. It's like saying anarchism and democracy are related because they're forms of sociopolitical organization.
Arbitrary
Tranny Chaser
- 28,957
- 79,437
No, it's not. You do not get to sit here and claim that the social movement of feminism is actually a component of sociology and thus give it some sort of automatic scientific credibility. There is certainly feminist theory that enters those waters but it is not the same thing as the big blanket term "feminism."
Social science IS a science, not hard one, no. That's a discussion for another day!