Science Ethics and Racism in Drug Enforcement Thread

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
I only argue with Hodj when he is wrong, which admittedly is often but not always.
smile.png
You're so cute, c'mere ya big lug, lets hug it out and circle jerk it out on my bed.
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
My point was regarding TCM is that declaring unethical or not, it is up to the culture that uses it. Ethics are not universal as Hodj claims and Cad pointed this out. If I were in China TCM will be ethical, not effective but ethical. If I'm on the western world, tcm is unethical.

Hodj litmus test of "Is it valid, or quantifiable or tested" in order to determined ethically is ridiculous, even in the medical field, where there are lots of treatments that only work some times and we still use them with partial success.

Hodj please link me the ethics of parenting, so I can read them.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
If the ethics of woofuckery is up to the culture to decide then creationism should be taught in classrooms because sixty fucking percent of this retarded fucking culture literally believes the earth was created whole cloth 6000 years ago.

Teaching children demonstrable lies as truth is also unethical as fuck.
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
It is unethical to tech something you know is a lie, not something that to your knowledge you think is truth, regardless of it is actually truth or not. Ethics change with times, the same as morals. Who would have thunk it.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
It is unethical to teach that which is not demonstrably true as if it were true. If you think something is true, but cannot demonstrate it, then stop pretending to know things you do not know. Every crackpot snake oil huckster on the Earth will proclaim they truly believe the horseshit they are spewing. Again, I care not a whit for what someone believes, only what they know.
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
So teaching any religion is unethical as it is not demonstrable by definition, or any stretch of human ability. Many religious individuals will assert, that not only they believe God to be true, they know that God exists. So under your line of thinking, those individuals are unethical.

Say it come on, stand by your words.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,847
50,771
So teaching any religion is unethical as it is not demonstrable by definition, or any stretch of human ability.
Say it come on, stand by your words.
Uhh I definitely think teaching little kids religion is unethical.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
Thats a nice strawman you got there, would you like to reread my statement and try again?
 

Phazael

Confirmed Beta Shitlord, Fat Bastard
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
14,803
32,024
Hodj probably knows the terminology on this better, but trying to make an argument that a social order in power dictates the definition of what is ethical is basically "Might Makes Right", which is great in the rare cases when the powerful are actually on the correct side of things. Let me Godwin this shit and say that even if the Germans had won WW2, it did not make gassing all the jews any more ethical. Giving poor black men syphilis in this country to gather medical information certainly was not ethical, despite occurring in a highly racist period in our history and with full government sanction.

Ethics is one facet of the many complex social constructs in our species traits that makes us so successful. And like many of our instincts, humans are often capable of disregarding it when personal gain is on the table. People rationalize all sorts of bullshit to bend our morals and ethics, explain away things we do not understand, or just plain cope with bad situations. Those choices might be rational in some cases, but that does not in any way make them ethical. It might be rational to lie to people to achieve a goal or establish a means of control over the masses for social order (hi2u religion), but it is not ethical.

That's really the best case I can make for why ethics are independent of culture or even cold rational thinking. That is not to say they are universal, as like all areas of human experience they evolve over time as we learn more about the world around us. But the basic core concepts of empathy and valuing life are pretty much as close to universal as you can get.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,847
50,771
But the basic core concepts of empathy and valuing life are pretty much as close to universal as you can get.
It seems so in 2015 in America, anyway. This idea that life has some intrinsic value is a relatively new idea in human history.
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
So teaching any religion is unethical as it is not demonstrable by definition, or any stretch of human ability. Many religious individuals will assert, that not only they believe God to be true, they know that God exists. So under your line of thinking, those individuals are unethical.

Say it come on, stand by your words.
Re read and adjusted. Try now. Added the believe and know part.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
Uhh I definitely think teaching little kids religion is unethical.
Teaching it to them as unquestionable truth is absolutely unethical, teaching it to them as a part of cultural studies and mythology type social studies is okay. Like we dont teach creationism in science classes, because its not science. But doing like a world history class covering topics such as the various myhological world views on origins is fine, provided they get a balanced view and we cover, you know, the Norse myths and how Pangu created the world while hatching from an egg and shit.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,847
50,771
So teaching any religion is unethical as it is not demonstrable by definition, or any stretch of human ability. Many religious individuals will assert, that not only they believe God to be true, they know that God exists. So under your line of thinking, those individuals are unethical.

Say it come on, stand by your words.
The fact that they believe it to their core doesn't make it any less of a delusion. Them believing it doesn't change its truth value. Them believing it doesn't make prayer somehow more effective. It. Is. False. Teaching little kids things that are known to be false and secondarily teaching them that questioning it makes them a bad person is per se unethical, in my view.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,378
Because they are too young, or because is it not demonstrable / valid / tested? Or what other reason do you have?
Because it is fucking child abuse. Every home schooled creationist child in this nation is being psychologically fucking abused.
 

Lendarios

Trump's Staff
<Gold Donor>
19,360
-17,424
Teaching it to them as unquestionable truth is absolutely unethical, teaching it to them as a part of cultural studies and mythology type social studies is okay. Like we dont teach creationism in science classes, because its not science. But doing like a world history class covering topics such as the various myhological world views on origins is fine, provided they get a balanced view and we cover, you know, the Norse myths and how Pangu created the world while hatching from an egg and shit.
We don't teach creationism, because the US constitution forbids it, not because its unethical, the two are unrelated. Second are you sggesting that the solution to teaching something that is not demonstrable/valid/tested, like Christianity, is to teach even more things that are not demonstrable/valid/tested.
Also you are dancing like tanoomba.
Question hodj ..
Are Catechism classes unethical? Yes/ no /why?