Ok, whats the minimum viable population for post-apocalypse humans bent on survival with unknown climate conditions?
Goal post and burden shifting. Your argument is that 50 to 100 thousand people would not just survive, but would maintain industry, including being able to put forward scientific advances which allowed them to modify non food stuffs into edible food stuffs, all to survive on marginal terrain in the northern most climates.
How's about you put up
any evidence whatsoeverthat your
baseless opinionis remotely viable in the first place?
You can't. That's why you've been throwing shit fits, demanding unreasonable standards like "Predict the exact cause of the demise of the last humans in such a situation or its not possible".
Before anyone can give you a minimum viable human population, you're going to need to define what you mean by survival. Even then, the fact of the genetic bottleneck and the vulnerability to disease would probably severely restrict the bottom limit on the number of humans required for survival. At minimum you're looking at a few million humans. If we use the collapse of Native American populations upon first contact as a baseless, they lost 9 out of every 10 individuals, and had 25 million to 100 million citizens, and BARELY survived the situation. Entire civilizations collapses, entire cities fell apart at the seams, and the few remaining were left wandering the wilds as hunter gatherers.
In the situation you have described, however, where we have magical technology and industry still thriving in the face of the extinction of most of the planet, I don't think its even possible. You've created such an unreasonable standard.
Then it would also rely on whether or not ocean populations and ecologically relevant keystone species would need to survive. We aren't hand pollinating enough food to support 100,000 people, for instance, anytime soon.
This is what qualifies as debate these days? Cad, I think you are getting trolled.
The guy literally has made the case that 50 to 100 thousand humans would magically pick up massive industrial complexes and shift them to Northern Nunavut, where they would proceed to modify grass and tree bark to survive a massive ecological collapse following a 5 to 10 degree global temperature increase, and you're claiming
I'm trolling him
Literally retarded.