Are we not allowed to see who votes for the appeals? Serious question.
yeah, it's been this way for a while and it never made sense considering we elect the mods and should be able to judge them by their shitty votes.Are we not allowed to see who votes for the appeals? Serious question.
The poll is meant to be anonymous. Mods reveal their votes at their own discretion.Are we not allowed to see who votes for the appeals? Serious question.
Those polls should be public, in my opinion.The poll is meant to be anonymous. Mods reveal their votes at their own discretion.
Make a poll about it.it was originally @a_skeleton_03's rule that all serious polls on the site are to be anonymous votes.Those polls should be public, in my opinion.
apparently not for thin skinned Trump supporters!The politics thread was fun to read.
who is your leadoff hitter?Can Amod take a vote for a reduced sentence? 3 days maybe?
Screamfeeder is our 4th at bat on the liberal lineup, we really need him.
So that is my rule. You voted these mods in and shouldn't need to see any of what they do and just trust them. For some reason you can't so we have appeal votes and other democracy farces.Those polls should be public, in my opinion.
30 days is pure faggotry and you know it. Also, I'm assuming you're talking about generic "you" when you say "Here you are complaining in this thread that Screamfeeder was railroaded..." because I'm most certainly not complaining about that.So that is my rule. You voted these mods in and shouldn't need to see any of what they do and just trust them. For some reason you can't so we have appeal votes and other democracy farces.
So if all those polls are public it creates a few issues.
1.) They don't vote their conscience for fear of "reprisal"
2.) The discussion about who voted which way goes for days
Here you are complaining in this thread that Screamfeeder was railroaded for not buying into the group think while trying to find out which mods didn't vote the way of your groupthink ....
The vote was 3-0 and probably would have been 5-0 but the other two just haven't logged in. They won't vote now because it's a moot point since the majority won.
why is this an issue? moderators should be held accountable for their decision making, both good and bad. that is literally the #1 metric we have available to make judgements about their re-electability going forward.So that is my rule. You voted these mods in and shouldn't need to see any of what they do and just trust them. For some reason you can't so we have appeal votes and other democracy farces.
So if all those polls are public it creates a few issues.
1.) They don't vote their conscience for fear of "reprisal"
Yes the proverbial you of course, I just used your post as a springboard for the discussion.30 days is pure faggotry and you know it. Also, I'm assuming you're talking about generic "you" when you say "Here you are complaining in this thread that Screamfeeder was railroaded..." because I'm most certainly not complaining about that.
So that is my rule. You voted these mods in and shouldn't need to see any of what they do and just trust them. For some reason you can't so we have appeal votes and other democracy farces.
So if all those polls are public it creates a few issues.
1.) They don't vote their conscience for fear of "reprisal"
2.) The discussion about who voted which way goes for days
Here you are complaining in this thread that Screamfeeder was railroaded for not buying into the group think while trying to find out which mods didn't vote the way of your groupthink ....
The vote was 3-0 and probably would have been 5-0 but the other two just haven't logged in. They won't vote now because it's a moot point since the majority won.
You have nothing to fear. We would never shaw a white male Trump supporter.my vote would be 12-24 hour drunk tank shaw when it's obvious someone drunk posting, i vote this way mostly to protect myself in the future