On the contrary Scream, whenever you say I've missed something I ALWAYS go back to read and verify it. Always. If I continue to disagree with you, its because I know I have not misread your point. The issue is you think halfway through our arguments that just because you were criticizing a point without expressing a position directly, that within the context of your posts where wasn't a position. In this you would be very, very wrong. Once you're a few posts in you always go too heavy, and your position becomes clear. Once you sense the logic trap though, you quickly try to claim that wasn't the case--but it almost always is. (Until recently, the last year or so).
However, when I'm wrong in this, I have no problem admitting it. That's the thing, I come here to be proven wrong about things--not to be right. Its why I'm prodding Hodj right now, because even if he's trolling, he's going to give me some Gems because the guy can't help but dive into his position and really assume the mantle of opposition to troll. He will make and defend points. I think I've juiced him out for now though. You? Ever since I've started calling you out on your tactic you've become much clearer in putting in the literal clauses that ensure you're not taking a position; at which point I'm done (Again, this began in the last year or so--this post is the first one I genuinely missed.). There is zero point in debate if my opponent doesn't have a position. Its why I almost always start out now with getting you to nail down your position now and you try to ghost so you can focus only on criticism of another position.
