Vanessa said:Police pulls person A over for going 70 in a 55. Person A acts a defiant, egotistical, rude jackass.
Police pulls person B over for going 70 in a 55. Person B has license, insurance, registration in hand before the officer even gets to their window and treats the officer with complete respect.
Who's going to get a ticket and who's going to get a warning?
I have no point except living in reality. This is reality. Life isn't fair friend. This is where 1st amendment auditors go off the rails... they *think* shit is fair and they become the victim of their own doing. You play ball or you wind up homeless and crazy.You have no point. In this case and using your idiotic simile, the cop just made up a rule on the spot and applied the punishment arbitrarily.
Grammarly works on phones sir.I realize more and more each day why I pay my editors so much when I look at my posts without the ability to spellcheck. Fucking hell I hate phone posting.
Police pulls person A over for going 70 in a 55. Person A acts a defiant, egotistical, rude jackass.
Police pulls person B over for going 70 in a 55. Person B has license, insurance, registration in hand before the officer even gets to their window and treats the officer with complete respect.
Furthermore, I'm not letting your faulty logic slide.the cop just made up a rule on the spot and applied the punishment arbitrarily.
Holy fuck you ARE a Christian.I have no point except living in reality. This is reality. Life isn't fair friend. This is where 1st amendment auditors go off the rails... they *think* shit is fair and they become the victim of their own doing. You play ball or you wind up homeless and crazy.
I have no idea what that is. Googling commencing. Thanks.Grammarly works on phones sir.
You realize there was no crime right? Like you get that your premise out of the gate is just wrong right?Furthermore, I'm not letting your faulty logic slide.
The cop made up no rule. Both person A and B are guilty of the same crime. Speeding is a crime. They're already breaking the "rule"; the cop is just enforcing it (i.e. writing a ticket to go into the system/before a judge). Same with the mods. You're person A who acted like a cunt and I told you to chill because you were acting like a cunt and you didn't listen. You got the raw deal out of the situation. Mods are just human beings. Cops are just human beings.
I'm sorry Scream... your logic is not computing with me. Please explain what rule the cop made up on the spot so I can follow what you're saying better. If you disagree completely that ON AVERAGE the person with a cooperative attitude will get a verbal warning and let go versus the stick-up-their-ass citizen given all other factors being the same, then you don't live in reality. Cop letting someone go based on good, cooperative behavior isn't making up a rule on the spot... it's them ignoring the rule (not speeding) already in place.
ROFLMAO YOU'RE KINDA DUMB HAHAHAHAHah! Yes.
I get that you were banned because LLR said to stop and TOLD you what would happen if you didn't. In YOUR situation, there was no crime... that's why I defended your PoV.You realize there was no crime right? Like you get that your premise out of the gate is just wrong right?
Except you're still FAR off base. You're trying to do the "This crime and THIS situation are different from THAT crime and that situation and im telling you there was no crime at all to begin with so then whole thing is moot...I get that you were banned because LLR said to stop and TOLD you what would happen if you didn't. In YOUR situation, there was no crime... that's why I defended your PoV.
In MY situation with the cops, there was a crime. To repeat: what I was telling Cad was NOT trying to draw a parallel to your situation... it was making a counterpoint to his point... it had nothing to do with you. You are conflating my post with your situation.
This is the 2nd time I'm saying I agree with you... no need to beat a dead horse here.
Thanks scream. Yeah that's kinda what I expected of LA. It makes sense that it would be just as difficult in other big cities like nyc, and chitown. For right now that's probably something I'm trying to avoid.I love LA for the gestalt. It's nothing like the liberal hellscape people claim it is (I actually live in a pretty conservative area) but you DO have a ton of wacky shit happening.
It is very hard to make good friends easily. You can very easily make have 500 fair-weather friends in the first few days, but actually getting people to really connect with can be tough. But I ran into that in Chicago and NY as well. People here are flakey and you get a lot of "Let's Hang!" followed by ghosting.
Except you're still FAR off base. You're trying to do the "This crime and THIS situation are different from THAT crime and that situation and im telling you there was no crime at all to begin with so then whole thing is moot...
It's what I struggle with when Lithose is unable to just read words.
There was no crime. I had the cops called on me for calling a dude a douche, cops showed up, I called them douches and the other guy a double douche and got booked.
Remember, guy was a douche to begin with. Take your bootlicking elsewhere.
...and yet:This is the 2nd time I'm saying I agree with you... no need to beat a dead horse here.
What's everyone's general opinion on ham vs turkey for Thanksgiving/Christmas?
Fair enough. I'm pretty damn picky on ham. But man I could get fat as hell eating leftover ham sammies after the holiday. Wheres the love for beef roasts hodj?I do turkey for thanksgiving, ham for christmas usually
If the Thanksgiving meal was big enough, like if you're going to have 8 or 10 or more people there, I'd probably do both ham and turkey