- 1
- 3
Elidroth, I'm sure I gave you some shit over the years, but I always appreciated that if you were given a rational argument with factual backing, you would either make a requested change, or something to address the issue, or would clearly state if you disagreed with the balance premise or if it couldn't be done.
I can't stand Prathun, Aristo, or Ngreth as eq developers, not in particular due to the content they make or decisions they made, not them as people, but because of how they flat out ignored players, ignored facts, and were seemingly more interested in doing what they wanted versus what players wanted.
Absor I always liked, for the same reason. You send him a PM with some actual info or relevant feedback, he answers. Do beta with him, he took your feedback versus just used you to test mechanics of the script. With a game like EQ, where the players often know the game better than the devs (not the code of course, but the content), ignoring feedback in favor of some ideal you have is not a great idea.
I can't stand Prathun, Aristo, or Ngreth as eq developers, not in particular due to the content they make or decisions they made, not them as people, but because of how they flat out ignored players, ignored facts, and were seemingly more interested in doing what they wanted versus what players wanted.
Absor I always liked, for the same reason. You send him a PM with some actual info or relevant feedback, he answers. Do beta with him, he took your feedback versus just used you to test mechanics of the script. With a game like EQ, where the players often know the game better than the devs (not the code of course, but the content), ignoring feedback in favor of some ideal you have is not a great idea.
- 3