Star Trek - Into Darkness

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Lenas

Trump's Staff
7,568
2,305
I don't think they'd do time travel two movies in a row. Probably going to be a stolen secret prototype or something.
 

Mahes

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
5,439
6,554
Not only a proto- type but it would be interesting if it were going to be named Enterprise. Would make for an interesting twist having the old Enterprise going against the new one.
 

spronk

FPS noob
23,491
27,464
fwiw you can buy tix to ST:ID for May 15th (wed) tickets on fandango at a few theaters per city, I guess a 2 day early nerd special
 

Ko Dokomo_sl

shitlord
478
1
Grabbed this from Reddit

Some of the material I've come across has implied the the C-in-C of Starfleet has a great deal of authority over exactly how the starfleet is to function without much oversight. Depending on the C-in-C and their inclination as either a scientist or a soldier, the entire makeup of the star fleet's ships and their capabilities can skew either way.

This was lightly touched on in Star Trek VI,


Bill, are we talking about mothballing the Starfleet? Our exploration and scientific programs would be unaffected, but...

So take the Starfleet Gene Roddenberry originally imagined, as the scientific, utopian space exploration fleet, while Nichols starfleet was far more militaristic. Some of us attribute it to the V'Ger incident, but it probably had more to do with rising tensions between the Klingon Empire and the Federation off screen. I'd suggest that this is implied due to how bitterly reluctant most of the crew of the Enterprise is for peace. That the organian disarmament didn't hold, and that everyone lost something due to prolonged conflict with the Klingon Empire. There is sadness and a wounding to how Shatner and Co deliver their lines when discussing the Klingons, and something intense about how Chang views Kirk as a formidable warrior. Perhaps the war with the Klingons went cold after it got hot.

So what does that have to do with this ship? Well, think about the attitudes of the Federation now. Vulcan was destroyed by a ship no one saw coming. Mass genocide. There is a thing, out there, not just one thing, but many things, terrifying things in the galaxy that no one can predict or defend against, and now the only option is for Starfleet to transform from a:


interstellar peace keeping armada

into something far more aggressive and sinister. Something darker. Something deadly.

If this movie is in anyway allegorical the way Star Trek 6 was allegorical, then perhaps when the Federation suffered a great a loss as the United States did on 9/11, it gives itself permission to become whatever it needs to protect itself, even if it violates the prime directive or values of it's own. Perhaps the centerpiece of the real villainy in this film isn't cumberbatch's terrorism, but that Kirk gets punished for violating the prime directive to save spock, when at the heart of Starfleet, the Prime Directive is disregarded for the sake of defending the Federation itself.

Whatever this ship is, it's a symbol, it's own symbol, which is why it resembles nothing iconic we can compare it too. My bloodpressure has been through the rough anytime someone compares it to the Excelsior.

What I think those people are talking about is the feeling you get when you compare, on screen the transition from the Art Deco style Enterprise to the Japanese Neo-Modernism that the original Excelsior had. That when you compare the NuEnterprise to the U.S.S. Holy-Crap that you have that same sort of visceral reaction to their contrast and comparision, but that is a different sort of feeling... a feeling that can be best described as being of the same material, but not the same substance, the same shape, but not the same color (which is as best as I can put it as a graphic artist...)

when you compare and contrast the NCC-1701 vs the NX-2000 you get a feeling that they are different flavors of Starfleet's history. That the romanticism of the Constitution class is giving way to a far more functional and intentional, modular, and practical future. From the point of view of the screenwriter, it should be considered a future within a future.

U.S.S. Excelsior suggested that the Future would be new and different post Enterprise. (From the vantage point of SFS without seeing 4-6)

This ship, is like a grim reaper, and I fear that our efforts to identify it or compare it to things we have seen before diminish it's own unique symbolic significance that this will have to the franchise in the future. Not that it matters. We'll all forget this pre-movie speculation as soon as the credits roll in the theaters.

TLDR; This ship is a symbol for the harbinger of death for the Federation's future, not any class like we've seen before. This ship is starbuck
 

Qhue

Tranny Chaser
7,641
4,602
Well there has to be some reason it is called "Into Darkness". So that would support a fifth column of the Federation going to a more militaristic and dark place. But then why blow up London? As a way to force the public into a panic and advance militaristic adoption ala Phantom Menace?
 

Lodi

Blackwing Lair Raider
1,491
1,506
My guess is that the big ship is a repainted Red Dwarf. The bad guy is the alternate universe Rimmer, Ace.
 

Inque

FunEmployed
516
697
Summarizing some points I picked up on ze Internetz:

Allegedly the ship belongs to Admiral Marcus and is part of Federation Section 31 Special Ops (aka Excelsior) but is titled Dreadnaught. "John Harrison" understands all the technical specs of the ship and pairs up with Kirk to get on board via an airlock on the enemy ship with the help of Scotty (who we dont understand WHY yet Chekov is wearing red. I'd say Chekov is our current Engineering Officer on Enterprise). Meanwhile, Harrison is either A) an Augment or B) an Android which almost all arguements are for him being an augment, and his 'crew' is other augmented individuals ala Botany Bay with Marcus in command. Harrison and his 'crew' are being manipulated by Marcus and Kirk discovers a higher level conspiracy involving Marcus, a paranoid Federation and manipulation of genetics which makes him a hero; Harrison dies towards the latter half of the movie as an act of redemption to save his crew (the USS Botany Bay, held as collateral by Marcus to ensure Harrison does as told). Meanwhile, on the Klingon homeworld (or wherever The Botany Bay's crew was being held hostage in cryo) Khan is woken up and begins exacting revenge (que Star Trek reboot III) for the shit The Federation attempted.

There's a novel out called Dreadnaught that seems to have had some points used for the new movie.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,486
23,950
Normally I'd guess it's from the mirror universe just from that one shot of the two ships shown like that, but I don't think even JJ Abrams has the balls to do a movie, or series of movies, about the mirror universe after starting the series off in an alternate timeline to begin with. Though it's possible that this could be this alternate timeline becoming something like the mirror universe through a relatively normal course of events?

I do think that ship looks like the Enterprise and the Galactica had a fucking baby. What's with the giant artillery gun on it? That shit is awesome.
 

Rengak

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,879
2,761
Khan's ship looks like the USS Excelsior from Star Trek 6.


USS_Excelsior_stalls_outside_Spacedock.jpg
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,486
23,950
Khan's ship looks like the USS Excelsior from Star Trek 6.


USS_Excelsior_stalls_outside_Spacedock.jpg
It really doesn't look like that at all. It's a warship. A really fucking big warship, and it doesn't look anything like any of the other ships in the new timeline.
 

Gromit

Golden Knight of the Realm
102
12
The image of it they had on reddit to me anyway, looked like a scaled up version of that current Enterprise.
 

Jarnin_sl

shitlord
351
0
Based on what I've seen, this looks like a struggle between the "ends justify the means" vs. the "means justify the ends" kind of story. Vulcan was destroyed in the last movie, so I'm guessing it's going to be an allegory to what happened in the U.S.A. after 9/11/2001.

Best guess is there is a schism in the top brass of Starfleet who wants to go on on the offensive so that nothing like the destruction of Vulcan can ever happen again, and if that means building warships and exchanging science and exploration for tighter borders and taking the fight to their enemies, that's exactly what they want to do. But first they have to deal with the folks in Starfleet that disagree with their ideals and motivations.

SoInto Darknesslooks to me like it's going to be about a coup d'etat attempt within the Federation, and Cumberbatch is the point man. I'm guessing Admiral Robert April is gonna be the ring leader pulling the strings. The attack on London will be blamed on terrorists, and it'll give April reason to call for more security and less freedoms in order to protect the Federation; basically a power grab.


All those conspiracy theorists who think/thought that 9/11 was an inside job are going to love this movie.
 

masteen

N00b
92
23
I'm betting that this fifth column has been secretly stealing resources to build their killing machine. Just like real governments!
 

Dumar_sl

shitlord
3,712
4
I'm refusing all invitations to see this piece of shit, which I've already made my friends well aware. If you're a ST or fan of real scifi generally, you should be doing the same. If you're an average mainstream mouthbreather lemming, I'm sure you'll love it.