Vaclav
Bronze Baronet of the Realm
- 12,650
- 877
And this board is completely representative of the entirety of the world now? You're a genius. And for hating consoles didn't you just buying $1k worth just a few months ago? (Well, there with a game each at least)
Both have their ups and downs - not to mention on the value argument there's services that outstrip the value of PC by far like Gamefly for those that are swift with completing things, even a $30 purchase loses out to a $15 Gamefly subscription for anything you'll be finished with in under a month, and PC doesn't get Gamefly except for ancient shit. And of course the ability to recoup the "loss" on something by reselling a game another option that doesn't exist on PC (at least these days).
And honestly, graphically the difference is basically gone these days - AC4 running on the same TV with a top of the line ATI video card PC looks fundamentally identical - maybe paused screenshots would note some differences, but didn't bother that, just a run it and play "test". [Although note, there were notable differences with our Nvidia rig, but only because of the over the top smoke effects] And that's with something that was done quickly for console optimization. [And note, the PCs I'm comparing against that just match were $1.2k and $1.4k to build when they were new vs. a $400 console]
At the end of the day, if you're saving $10-20 a game every single time, you'd still need to assuming you're buying a full price game once a month (which I'd imagine is pretty normal), after a year you'd still have spent more getting an $800 PC together with those 12 games than just going the console route. (Unless say you're a college kid that convinced your parents to buy you a PC and the cost is immaterial - I like to assume people are adults though - kids and sane budget discussions don't go hand in hand) - and of course for a PC that $800 will likely need/want upgrades every couple years to stay up to snuff versus $400 that is top of the line for a minimum of 4 years.
Don't get me wrong, I love my PC - frankly, haven't touched my PS4 in a week in preference to it (although will restart soon as I get Tomb Raider for it - since I've not played the TR reboot yet) between MMX, ToME and other titles that will likely never be present on a console. The strongest argument for a PC is that it's for different types of games, not that it competes with consoles - consoles are their own thing and PCs are their own - with a limited amount of overlap that really matters.
Both have their ups and downs - not to mention on the value argument there's services that outstrip the value of PC by far like Gamefly for those that are swift with completing things, even a $30 purchase loses out to a $15 Gamefly subscription for anything you'll be finished with in under a month, and PC doesn't get Gamefly except for ancient shit. And of course the ability to recoup the "loss" on something by reselling a game another option that doesn't exist on PC (at least these days).
And honestly, graphically the difference is basically gone these days - AC4 running on the same TV with a top of the line ATI video card PC looks fundamentally identical - maybe paused screenshots would note some differences, but didn't bother that, just a run it and play "test". [Although note, there were notable differences with our Nvidia rig, but only because of the over the top smoke effects] And that's with something that was done quickly for console optimization. [And note, the PCs I'm comparing against that just match were $1.2k and $1.4k to build when they were new vs. a $400 console]
At the end of the day, if you're saving $10-20 a game every single time, you'd still need to assuming you're buying a full price game once a month (which I'd imagine is pretty normal), after a year you'd still have spent more getting an $800 PC together with those 12 games than just going the console route. (Unless say you're a college kid that convinced your parents to buy you a PC and the cost is immaterial - I like to assume people are adults though - kids and sane budget discussions don't go hand in hand) - and of course for a PC that $800 will likely need/want upgrades every couple years to stay up to snuff versus $400 that is top of the line for a minimum of 4 years.
Don't get me wrong, I love my PC - frankly, haven't touched my PS4 in a week in preference to it (although will restart soon as I get Tomb Raider for it - since I've not played the TR reboot yet) between MMX, ToME and other titles that will likely never be present on a console. The strongest argument for a PC is that it's for different types of games, not that it competes with consoles - consoles are their own thing and PCs are their own - with a limited amount of overlap that really matters.