Lithose
Buzzfeed Editor
I'd love to see citations on this. I'm curious how they would control for factors like selection bias? As in, if they merely studied unmarried vs married; and saw the married men were in better health...Then couldn't it just be argued that the married men were always in better health and that is why they were selected as mates in the first place? The whole courtship practice in humans is a pretty rigorous test of stabilityandphysical ability for men. I'm pretty curious to see how they would analog two males and be sure that the other wasnotmarrying because he desired to, but had many options to and NOT because he was simply rejected by potential mates.I think you misunderstood me. Men who are married show greater psychological adjustment and have better physical health than unmarried men. This is undisputed in the relationship literature. Men also reap these rewards in greater amounts than women do, which I admit myself is somewhat unexpected, but no less true. That means men are generally better off married than not married. I will provide citations if you don't believe me
Also interesting, men reap these rewards regardless of relationship satisfaction, whereas women must be satisfied with their relationship to reap the same rewards.
Not into this whole red pill thing; I think it's pretty silly. Just asking because I findactualstudies on human social interactions fascinating; fun to see how much like our other ape cousins we really are.