- 56,080
- 139,033
and then you come to "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)You're confusing support with just not caring anymore.
and then you come to "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)You're confusing support with just not caring anymore.
They decided to spy on everyone, it's a choice, how can we "let them do it" without the rulers deciding what they wanted to do.We let them(argueable, we(the public) were deceived at every turn for obvious reasons(watched rats behave differently than when they think they aren't being watched)) go through with the choice of spending billions of dollars and all this effort to create the apparatus of spying. That's a choice to do those things, it wasn't inevitable it was a choice."the rulers" didn't decide anything, bro. WE LET THEM DO IT. Whether you were for, against, or indifferent, you allowed it to happen. We all did, collectively.
Some jimmies being rustled in Washington1848: Washington is now asking Ecuador, as well as Cuba and Venezuela, not to admit Mr Snowden, a senior Obama administration official tells CNN
Too bad Venezuela is going down the toilet - many a hot girl and nice beach there and the Andean region is stunningly beautiful. If Chavez and co. hadn't destroyed the economy would have been an awesome place to live in exile. Much better than Cuba or Ecuador.From BBC News:
Some jimmies being rustled in Washington
Dear Cuba, I know we've told you to eat shit for pretty much the last 50 years but if you could please....From BBC News:
Some jimmies being rustled in Washington
We have actually been working on changing that and Cuba is smart enough to see that it would be in their best interest to deny him and by doing so 'Murica will owe them one. In fact it would be super interesting if Cuba told him to come on over and then handed him to us after a negotiation.Dear Cuba, I know we've told you to eat shit for pretty much the last 50 years but if you could please....
When did I ever say I support it?So you were against it but now that those who were for it before are against it, you are fine with it? I really don't get that attitude. Were the reasons you were against it in the first place no longer valid?
At the time, the people for the Patriot Act said that it was needed to solve crime. Yet we have seen that it has done little in that regard. The people against the Patriot Act were for the most part worried about how the intrusion to liberty could continue to grow. All these concerns have proven to be true. So I would definitely expect many that were for the patriot act to be against it now.
Your support of all this stuff seems to just be schadenfreude at the old supporters.
That is some passive bullshit right there. Yeah bro, you just sit around and things happen to you. THEY DID IT! No, they didn't "do it." They said "we want to do it" And America collectively said "Meh, whatever." Accept some responsibility.They decided to spy on everyone, it's a choice, how can we "let them do it" without the rulers deciding what they wanted to do.We let them(argueable, we(the public) were deceived at every turn for obvious reasons(watched rats behave differently than when they think they aren't being watched)) go through with the choice of spending billions of dollars and all this effort to create the apparatus of spying. That's a choice to do those things, it wasn't inevitable it was a choice.
This is the power we have.http://www.opensecrets.org/bigpicture/reelect.phpyes I am saying we are a sham of a democracy, what actual power does the public have, when both parties agree on something, there is nobody to vote out when both sides agree, or you are "throwing your vote away". it's kind of hard to exercise any power beyond whatever an opinion poll or a vote can do.
You keep saying that "We did it", as if everyone complaining about it supported it at the time. You definitely seem to be brushing aside any privacy concerns because for whatever reason you think the very few privacy safeguards will be enough. You seem to think that just because it has been happening for 10 years, even though most of us had no idea of the significance, makes it no big deal.When did I ever say I support it?
Well... we DID do it. The same republicans crying crocodile tears over Obama's police state are the same ones who were rolling their eyes at liberal objections when these laws were passed. Funny enough, those same uppity liberals seem largely content to roll with it now.You keep saying that "We did it", as if everyone complaining about it supported it at the time. You definitely seem to be brushing aside any privacy concerns because for whatever reason you think the very few privacy safeguards will be enough. You seem to think that just because it has been happening for 10 years, even though most of us had no idea of the significance, makes it no big deal.
Maybe it is just all apathy, but its hard to see how someone wouldn't think you were a supporter of it.
I mean, I agree with you that it isn't some conspiracy. I don't think anyone is violating any laws, they are just stretching everything to the limits. That to me doesn't make it a good thing.
It's pointless to vote people out if the next guy is just going to do the same thing. Republican vs. Democrat is a fake option, and they make the rules so they can ensure no third party can get traction. On top of that, you can't really blame the voters for this when every aspect of it is classified. Even members of congress who are not on the intelligence committee are not allowed to know about this stuff, so you guys talking about your security clearance are quite a joke.If you really care and the rest of the US really cared we would be voting out the incumbments.
Ron Wyden in 2011_sl said:Wyden: I believe there are two Patriot Acts in America: The first is the text of the law itself, and the second is the government's secret interpretation of what they believe the law means ...the American people will also be extremely surprised when they learn how the Patriot Act is secretly being interpreted, and I believe one consequence will be an erosion of public confidence that makes it more difficult for our critically important national intelligence agencies to function effectively. ...
How did we know when it was classified? Shit like the patriot act yeah, but prism was in a black hole and god only knows what else."the rulers" didn't decide anything, bro. WE LET THEM DO IT. Whether you were for, against, or indifferent, you allowed it to happen. We all did, collectively.
Brutul i typed the exact question like 2 pages back, general consenus by the in the knows with military clearance is:What would Snowden's motivation to lie about this be? He had a great life, a pretty hot girlfriend, was making lots of money, etc. He has given up everything he has to bring this story to light and he will be either living on the run or in prison for a long time now. Also,Sen. Ron Wyden has been trying to let people know about thisfor a couple years now without violating his own security clearance and his slot on the intelligence committee.
That's silly. Two huge reasons why the administration absolutely has to nail him now. The first is, obviously, the guy committed a huge federal crime that they define as having caused "exceptionally grave damage" to national security by releasing TS information. Second, there are 5 million other people with clearances. If Snowden doesn't get absolutely pounded that sends a message to them that the oaths they took are now optional, all they have to do is disagree on principle with something and release is just ok.On the Snowden thing:
I think the administration has/is gone/going down the wrong path with him. What concerns me right now is all the intel he's supposedly walking around with, to other countries (I know Obama says his foreign policy has made friends of everyone, but let's be honest - foreign relations have stagnated and worse under this administration).
As of yet, Snowden has only released information proving the existence of the programs, and not any real details. If Obama really wants to have an open debate about this like he keeps saying (right before he goes into closed-door meetings about it), why not ask Snowden to come back? Slap him on the wrist with one or two years in prison, full conjugal visits for his little "ballerina" stripper GF, we get the actual sensitive information back, and then we have an actual debate about what's going on. He can then go work for some indie site on the blogosphere or something. Instead, it's a full out burn-him-to-the-ground atmosphere.
This would not only help public image of the administration but would keep all the info he has out of other countries' hands.
Unless, of course, there is something to hide. That is the government line tous, anyway. Hey, if you have nothing to hide, then it's all good, right? Honestly, to me, this must be what's going on. But instead he's being charged under the Espionage Act and trying to be discredited by this administration and much of the press using the same tired old shit - He's a high school drop-out, on meds, etc. They attack anything but the actual information he's putting out.
And before you go all out on the He Broke The Law And Has To Pay, The Traitor, I think everyone here damn well knows that that only applies to normal Americans and has been, is being, and will continue to be subject to who you know and what you know. Legislators and Judges and their ilk get away with all sorts of shit that normal Americans do not, and this would be in the guise of National Security, so how can you argue that?
.......
And if "WE" did it, we should definitely be allowed to undo it. That doesn't seem like much of an option atm.