tad10
Elisha Dushku
- 5,533
- 599
So find the good people, support them and help them get elected. Don't just throw you hands in the air and QQ. or you can do what fanaskin has done and just go full Lumie on us.
So find the good people, support them and help them get elected. Don't just throw you hands in the air and QQ. or you can do what fanaskin has done and just go full Lumie on us.
It's nice when they care about white people, eh?I'm not typically a huge fan of the ACLU given how many spurious lawsuits they drop to make a spectacle of local/regional non-issues to push them to the national stage, but I'm glad they are actually litigating against the Patriot Act again given the new evidence of its misuse. Not that they haven't tried in the past, but this will certainly make getting to SCOTUS easier. Difficult to get a writ of Cert when you have to prove a vague statue provides injury in fact when all applications of it are completely secret.
This argument is pretty tired, imo. Congress has had like a 10% approval rating for how long now? They keep getting re-elected, esp if they have the money to do so. On the off chance that an outsider gets elected, the established system within Congress teaches them real quick that if they want to stay, they have to play.That is your problem. I am not talking Republican vs Democrat. I am speaking purely on if they vote for things you don't like they get voted out. It's that simple. Right now if you are in congress you don't ever get voted out until you retire.
That damn ACLU, finally they protect white people (wait, the NSA thing only affects whites?), I mean just look at this long list of frivolous bullshit they have wasted everyone's time with!It's nice when they care about white people, eh?I'm kind of in the same boat having to re-evaluate the ACLU for how they've been one of the very few to actually be critical. I'm a big fan of open-minded skepticism.
The ACLU has always been for preserving freedoms. They have just gone through periods of leadership with agendas that were simply contrarian rather than usefully trying to make positive changes. I don't know why you are bringing up race except that they did much needed work to enforce the civil rights act(s)? They got their start, IIRC, back in the '20s and '30s when there was only white people to help because other races didn't get trials.It's nice when they care about white people, eh?I'm kind of in the same boat having to re-evaluate the ACLU for how they've been one of the very few to actually be critical. I'm a big fan of open-minded skepticism.
I was just playing, as those on this board are wont to do. You are absolutely correct.The ACLU has always been for preserving freedoms. They have just gone through periods of leadership with agendas that were simply contrarian rather than usefully trying to make positive changes. I don't know why you are bringing up race except that they did much needed work to enforce the civil rights act(s)? They got their start, IIRC, back in the '20s and '30s when there was only white people to help because other races didn't get trials.
Congress has a low approval rating as a whole. Individual members have higher approval ratings and consistently win reelection. This disconnect has been talked about many times in the political thread.This argument is pretty tired, imo. Congress has had like a 10% approval rating for how long now? They keep getting re-elected, esp if they have the money to do so. On the off chance that an outsider gets elected, the established system within Congress teaches them real quick that if they want to stay, they have to play.
Do you actually think that enough people will vote out incumbents when they have the most money to blast out either We'll give you more free shit from rich people, or we'll lower your taxes so you keep more of you earned income so you can hire poor people to clean up after you. Against that, civil liberties and rights take a back seat.
The "system" that is in place does exist, and it's stacked against us voting out our crappy "elected" leaders. Protesting doesn't do shit, as we've been trained to be civil and non-violent. Not to sound like GA, but holding out a sign in front of a building = being ignored. Tell me a time it hasn't been. Iraq War, OWS, whatever. It's a news story for 1-2 weeks and gets some reassurances before The Voice gets down to its finalists or GoT has the Red Wedding, or some Kardashian does whatever the fuck it is they do.
You can't have it both ways and talk about how stupid the average person is and the people they vote for, then all of a sudden be like, oh, well, vote them out if you don't like them spying on you.
I'm going to agree that this is a turning point in the country. Never before have I considered our government not superior to all others. It's a sad day.
It's not the worst thing our country has ever done. But it is the worst thing our country IS doing to its citizens right now. I am not understanding how you don't consider this the single most important issue going on right now. Our government is collecting personal information on ALL of its citizens (and if we're talking like 98% or something, that's all). Our government officials have been straight up lying to us, but all you care about is what happens to Snowden. That is mind-boggling, my friend.I'm not playing any card, I'm laying out the facts bro. This isn't even close to the worst thing our country has done. Not even the same ballpark. To me, it is kind of shocking to see you actually say that since they are collecting the phone records on the majority that is somehow worse than state-sanctioned/mandated oppression of minorities. Or because we're only killing Iraqi babies that's ok. So when BoldW says that about not believing we are superior anymore due to this, I have a hard time understanding it. It doesn't jive with the reality of what our nation is.
It really isn't the worst thing even that our government is doing right now. Stroll on over to the Cops Who Shoot People and Stay On Duty To Shoot More People thread to see some examples of some real shit. This is white people problems compared to that. And it isn't that all I care about is what happens to Snowden, I'm just not buying this narrative of him as the intelligence and policy expert and hero of the people. Saying that Snowden is a shitbag or that the program is legal doesn't mean I approve of the program.It's not the worst thing our country has ever done. But it is the worst thing our country IS doing to its citizens right now. I am not understanding how you don't consider this the single most important issue going on right now. Our government is collecting personal information on ALL of its citizens (and if we're talking like 98% or something, that's all). Our government officials have been straight up lying to us, but all you care about is what happens to Snowden. That is mind-boggling, my friend.
At what point do you start questioning their motives and tactics? National curfews, random house searches, all mail being opened and read, civil "testing" of all citizens, what? They've already stolen your personal information and lied to you about it, breaking the 4th amendment and I'm sure a bunch of other laws. Journalistic sources are much more tight-lipped, even with non-classified information due to revelations and that the government is prosecuting whistleblowers at an unheard of rate. Journalists are being prosecuted and pressured by this administration. David Gregory thinks Greenwald should be tried for aiding and abetting. We have secret courts who make secret decisions without as much as writing an opinion on why what they're authorizing is legal.
Yeah, you can't relate any of this to war-time operations. It is not the same thing and not related.
We'll more than likely continue to disagree on this. You've given our government the benefit of the doubt. I do not give them the benefit of the doubt (again, especially when they've already spied on me in secret and then lied about it) until they stop lying and come clean so we can examine and actually have a voice in what's going on, and find ways to root out terrorists without infringing upon my rights, unless I specifically say that's ok - electing an official is not the same as having a public debate about things, as this current administration keeps telling us they love to do.
Am I an asshole because I care about myself more than someone else in another country who might be oppressed right now? /shrug Sounds pretty normal to me.