Exactly, he didn't need to release tidbit by tidbit so that everyone could read it in the newspaper week by week in the Sunday edition.This isn't the 1970s with Daniel Ellsberg anymore, brah.
The consumption and dissemination of information has changed. Get with the times, grandpa.
And within a week, the news has moved onto something new and shiny, and forgets that Snowden ever existed.Exactly, he didn't need to release tidbit by tidbit so that everyone could read it in the newspaper week by week in the Sunday edition.
He releases EVERYTHING immediately.
and he wasn't immediatley thrown in jail for it either, you keep missing that part.Exactly, he didn't need to release tidbit by tidbit so that everyone could read it in the newspaper week by week in the Sunday edition.
He releases EVERYTHING immediately.
North Korea should try to track him down and kill or apprehend him and their allies will do everything they can to turn him over to them or kill him themselves. Anyone country would do the same.So if tomorrow, a North Korean officer or high ranking military member releases a shit ton of classified North Korean information that could assist in bringing that regime down, he should be ignored and shipped back to Kim Jong-Un for summery execution?
his goal was to get that shit known by as much people as possible, I don't know the best way to do it but he thought that way was the best for what was available to him.Exactly, he didn't need to release tidbit by tidbit so that everyone could read it in the newspaper week by week in the Sunday edition.
He releases EVERYTHING immediately.
So you are saying that since Snowden only released a tiny tidbit of information that is the only reason he is out of jail or still alive?!?! Are you kidding me?!?and he wasn't immediatley thrown in jail for it either, you keep missing that part.
I'm not sure bro, do we generally work with North Korea? Do I really give much of a shit what happens to North Koreans?So if tomorrow, a North Korean officer or high ranking military member releases a shit ton of classified North Korean information that could assist in bringing that regime down, he should be ignored and shipped back to Kim Jong-Un for summery execution?
Him being a shithead is taking care of that problem alone. If he was going for theatrics he should have gone all "Anonymous" or Deep Throat.And within a week, the news has moved onto something new and shiny, and forgets that Snowden ever existed.
But he broke a law and by your two's standing, he should be handed over to the authorities.North Korea should try to track him down and kill or apprehend him and their allies will do everything they can to turn him over to them or kill him themselves. Anyone country would do the same.
We would take advantage of that information just as much as any other country would take advantage of this information and any more stuff he claims that he has.
The best way to get out information to as many people as possible is to not release it all? That is odd.his goal was to get that shit known by as much people as possible, I don't know the best way to do it but he thought that way was the best for what was available to him.
That is exactly what I said ....But he broke a law and by your two's standing, he should be handed over to the authorities.
Yes, only a_skeleton_03 and I are of the quite controversial opinion that people should stand trial for crimes they commit.But he broke a law and by your two's standing, he should be handed over to the authorities.
So it seem we still have to see if he will continue to "release tidbit by tidbit" or if he's pretty much done.There are legitimate reasons for secrecy, and specifically for secrecy about communications intelligence. That's why Bradley Mannning and I -bothof whom had access to such intelligence with clearances higher than top-secret - chose not to disclose any information with that classification. And it is whyEdward Snowdenhas committed himself to withhold publication of most of what he might have revealed.
He only released some of it ... how is that getting as much information to as many people as possible?is to release it the way he did ?
So, it's only ok to subvert authority is if it isn't yours? It's ok to break some laws, but not others? I'm arguing you on the principle of your belief and the only thing you can come at me with is some bullshit Nationalism crap? Weak.I'm not sure bro, do we generally work with North Korea? Do I really give much of a shit what happens to North Koreans?
A more fitting analogy might be a British citizen revealing classified information about a similar program in England. And I would say yes, absolutely, send his ass back to stand trial.
What are you talking about? That is THEIR mess to clean up. This is OUR mess to clean up.So, it's only ok to subvert authority is if it isn't yours? It's ok to break some laws, but not others? I'm arguing you on the principle of your belief and the only thing you can come at me with is some bullshit Nationalism crap? Weak.
No i'm saying having a "war on whistle blowers" is directly contrary to have a more "free and open" society.So you are saying that since Snowden only released a tiny tidbit of information that is the only reason he is out of jail or still alive?!?! Are you kidding me?!?