The NSA watches you poop.

fanaskin · Jul 25, 2013

Iannis_sl said:
black widows hatched out in his car. I mean lots of black widows. Hungry ones.

Those kill children and elderly sick people not healthy adults.

iannis · Jul 25, 2013

Untreated theycankill a healthy adult. It helps if they bite you on the neck or chest.

Dat Neurotoxin is some serious shit.

It's more the crashing his car while screaming and being bitten by ravenous spiders that kills him though.

My plan is genius.

tad10 · Jul 25, 2013

Eomer_sl said:
The cause of the crash itself might be suspicious, but the car catching fire isn't. The fucking engine block was a hundred feet down the road, you idiot. No shit the fuel tank ruptured.

http://autos.yahoo.com/news/hackers-...010808189.html

Finally they directed me out to a country road, where Valasek showed that he could violently jerk the Prius' steering at any speed, threatening to send us into a cornfield or a head-on collision. "Imagine you're driving down a highway at 80 ," Valasek says. "You're going into the car next to you or into oncoming traffic. That's going to be bad times."

Eomer · Jul 25, 2013

tad10_sl said:
http://autos.yahoo.com/news/hackers-...010808189.html

What the fuck does that have to do with what I said? I'm not disputing whether or not the car was hacked. That's certainly possible, I suppose. You and other people when it was talked about a week or two back (specifically Araysar, who was most likely trolling) have latched on to the fact that the car blew up as evidence that he was murdered. It was obliterated by the impact of the collision. So again, no shit the car caught fire.

BoldW · Jul 25, 2013

So why exactly are members of congress immune to harmless data collection and storage? Have they never watched Homeland? I asked this after it came out, no one seemed to know or care.

BoldW · Jul 26, 2013

The numbers tell the story - in votes and dollars. On Wednesday, the house voted 217 to 205 not to rein in the NSA's phone-spying dragnet. It turns out that those 217 "no" voters received twice as much campaign financing from the defense and intelligence industry as the 205 "yes" voters.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/201...oney-nsa-vote/

Gavinmad · Jul 26, 2013

Hoss_sl said:
Say what? How do they do that, exactly? I mean, I'm no criminal mastermind, but even I know that they first need to find the gun they think fired the bullet before they can begin to match them up. And then, if the gun had a file run down the barrel, they will never get a ballistics match. Or better yet, if it just had the barrel replaced, then they wouldn't even be able to tell it had been tampered with.

Or instead of doing all that shit, you just cap him with some shitty revolver and then either melt it down or toss it in a fucking river.

BoldW · Jul 26, 2013

I'm curious. How do you cap someone who knows you're onto him, won't approach anyone and is moving in a car?

In response to my rhetorical question, you don't. He said he was going off the grid to his friends in his last E-Mail. That makes walking up to him and shooting him somewhat difficult.

Gavinmad · Jul 26, 2013

BoldW_sl said:
I'm curious. How do you cap someone who knows you're onto him, won't approach anyone and is moving in a car?

In response to my rhetorical question, you don't. He said he was going off the grid to his friends in his last E-Mail. That makes walking up to him and shooting him somewhat difficult.

Off the grid. Rofl.

tad10 · Jul 26, 2013

Random unexplained hacker death: the conspiracy theorists are on the hunt.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...ead-at-36.html

tad10 · Jul 26, 2013

BoldW_sl said:
So why exactly are members of congress immune to harmless data collection and storage? Have they never watched Homeland? I asked this after it came out, no one seemed to know or care.

People in the government are better than us. Haven't you read your Animal Farm? Hush and get back to work. The Pigs at the table have important stuff to discuss.

BoldW · Jul 26, 2013

Well, as close as he could get, let's say. The point is he wasn't a stationary target at a coffee shop working on his article. Shooting him wouldn't be an ideal choice.

I'm not saying his death was on purpose or not (still no one can give us the slightest clue what he was working on), but if someone did want to off him, shooting him would be less likely than some type of sabotage.

tad10 · Jul 26, 2013

BoldW_sl said:
Well, as close as he could get, let's say. The point is he wasn't a stationary target at a coffee shop working on his article. Shooting him wouldn't be an ideal choice.

I'm not saying his death was on purpose or not (still no one can give us the slightest clue what he was working on), but if someone did want to off him, shooting him would be less likely than some type of sabotage.

I'd say hacking his car and running it into a light pole at 100mph would be an excellant way to take someone out. 50,000 people die in traffic accidents every year, including many single car accidents. I note that I never heard word one of an autopsy and whether or not he had drugs or alcohol in his system. Anyone? Bueler? Bueler?

BrutulTM · Jul 26, 2013

BoldW_sl said:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/201...oney-nsa-vote/

Congress makes a lot more sense when you stop thinking that they are motivated by ideology or the will of the voters.

Hoss · Jul 27, 2013

Gavinrad_sl said:
Or instead of doing all that shit, you just cap him with some shitty revolver and then either melt it down or toss it in a fucking river.

Pretty sure what I said is both easier and more effective. Where would you even find something hot enough to melt down a revolver? And would it do it in a reasonable time? Guns tossed in rivers get found. Odds may seem low, but if anyone sees you do it, you'll wind up having to kill them too.

Quineloe · Jul 27, 2013

https://prism-break.org/

Lejina · Jul 27, 2013

Thermite?

Beef Supreme_sl · Jul 27, 2013

BrutulTM_sl said:
Congress makes a lot more sense when you stop thinking that they are motivated by ideology or the will of the voters.

They're motivated by the amount of money they will get through campaign bribes, access to info for insider trading, Uncle Sugar pensions and the like.

Once they get in office, it's a money grab.

AladainAF · Jul 27, 2013

Found this funny...

Before Snowden:

http://web.archive.org/web/201304250...ethics_agenda/

Protect Whistleblowers: Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled. We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government. Obama will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process.

After Snowden...... its gone.

lol.. what a travesty, and total load of shit this administration is.

http://www.alternet.org/speakeasy/ti...ared-changegov

Big Phoenix · Jul 27, 2013

Ohh Obama. If only we had a time machine and go back to 07/08 and get the reaction of his rabid supports when we tell them what his future holds.

The NSA watches you poop.

Well known agitator

Musty Nester

Elisha Dushku

Trakanon Raider

Molten Core Raider

Molten Core Raider

Mr. Poopybutthole

Molten Core Raider

Mr. Poopybutthole

Elisha Dushku

Elisha Dushku

Molten Core Raider

Elisha Dushku

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.

Make America's Team Great Again

Ahn'Qiraj Raider

(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻

shitlord

Best Rabbit

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer